[Laurie S]

"People aren't allowed to marry their dogs either. Does that bother you too? If not who are you to judge whether a man-dog sexual relationship is better or worse than a man-man sexual relationship? Neither of these sexual relationships is for children, just for pleasure. Where are the rights of men who want to marry their dogs? They are second class citizens with **no rights**. "

LOL! No one's talking about non-human marriage. I think your argument classifies as 'strawman'? Do I have that right? LOL! No, whether you like it or not, gays and lesibans are human and under our constitution should have the same rights as heterosexuals.. something in the constitution about 'all men' being created equal and such. :)

God bless! :)

[69ConvertibleFirebird]

LOL! No one's talking about non-human marriage.

LOL!!! Yes, we are takling about trying to make an un-natural act the basis of marriage. But, if you want to be judgmental and deny someone their rights you may try to do so. LOL!!!

So you are OK with fathers getting married to their daughters. Since that is two humans, and that is the only basis you want for marriage (two humans wanting it) you must be OK with incest.

And please let us know what God you worship when you say "God Bless." It's not the God of Christianity or the Jewish faith. Or Muslim for that matter. All of those Gods insist that honosexual acts are sin.

[BlackElk]

The language about all men being created equal is in the Declaration of Independence and not in the Constitution.

[reg45]

Who ever said that homosexuals were human? They may be a non-reproducing mutant species similar to humans, but they are NOT human. Humans can mate with humans and reproduce. A male of one race could marry a female of another race and the two of them could have children - this would be possible because they are both human.