Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Journalists in bed with Dictators
National Post ^ | 4/26/03 | George Jonas

Posted on 04/27/2003 7:08:49 PM PDT by freedom44

CNN News Executive Eason Jordan's confession, published in The New York Times on April 11, created a stir in media circles. Entitled "The News We Kept To Ourselves," Mr. Jordan agonized about the trips he made over the past 12 years to lobby Saddam's regime to keep CNN's Baghdad bureau open.

"Each time I visited," Mr. Jordan wrote, "I became more distressed by what I saw and heard -- awful things that could not be reported because doing so would have jeopardized the lives of Iraqis, particularly those on our Baghdad staff."

The CNN news chief's confession took me back 12 years to the first Gulf War. News anchor Dan Rather was asking one of CBS's Baghdad-bureau reporters, Betsy Aaron, to sum up her Iraqi experience in one sentence. The date was March 7, 1991. The day before, on March 6, Ms. Aaron, along with other Western reporters, had been expelled from Iraq and had made her way safely to Jordan.

"The one thing people have to know," Ms. Aaron replied, "is that this man, privately, Saddam Hussein, is a hated man."

The problem was -- as I noted in a column on March 18 -- this wasn't what Ms. Aaron had been reporting. She had been on CBS news almost every night during the war, with film clips of people shouting support for Saddam and spewing hatred of America. The same was reflected in her commentary -- e.g., on Feb. 27 Ms. Aaron did a stand-up from Baghdad, saying: "With their city in ruins, what is left on the street is pride .... The average citizen is confused by the politics swirling around him. He thinks the Iraqi government has made every concession that it can make for a peace with honour."

Once she could speak freely, the first thing Ms. Aaron told us was that the nub of her experience as a journalist contradicted the essence of her reports from Iraq. Which begged the question of what CBS hoped to achieve by sending her there.

"Networks know, or ought to know," I wrote 12 years ago, "that if a journalist has official permission to file reports from inside a tyranny he or she cannot tell the truth. Such a reporter will, at best, say nothing. Or else he'll be a mouthpiece, however reluctantly, for the tyrant's propaganda."

Which is what virtually all reporters ended up becoming in Iraq. CNN's Peter Arnett may have done it more lustily than most, but the major U.S. networks weren't far behind. A contemporary MediaWatch study, after analyzing every ABC World News Tonight, CBS Evening News, and NBC Nightly News item originating from Baghdad from Feb. 1 to Feb. 27, 1991, concluded that the correspondents reported on Iraqi opinion "without once suggesting the possibility of opposition" to Saddam. The researchers also found that one third of the news reports described Iraqi battle claims without challenge.

According to MediaWatch, the reporters weren't permitted to film any but civilian damage, yet only ABC's Bill Blakemore explained to viewers the Iraqis wouldn't allow him to see or discuss military targets. Naturally the impression created was the Allies bombed only civilians in Iraq. NBC's Tom Aspell went further. He conveyed the impression that the Iraqi version was true and the American version doubtful, by commenting on Feb. 18: "This morning they showed what's left of the milk factory bombed here weeks ago. The U.S. is still insisting it's a biological weapons plant."

In short, Mr. Jordan's recent revelations came as no surprise. Reporters "embedded" in dictatorships have always ended up going to bed with dictators -- a few willingly, and the rest by force of circumstances. The question is, why report from places like Baghdad?

Twelve years ago Ms. Aaron said on CBS This Morning: "I think you do a very valuable service reporting no matter what you are allowed to report." This may be the most memorable expression of a preference for illusion over content on record -- the art of reporting for its own sake -- but it's still nonsense, and pernicious nonsense at that.

Mr. Jordan simply writes: "I felt awful having these stories bottled up inside me." Offering no justification is the only thing to his credit -- but possibly he thinks none is needed. All he feels awful about is having been prevented from running with his scoops. As a Chicago Sun-Times editorial put it last week: "Perhaps the most incredible part of his account is that there is no sense that Jordan recognizes that CNN did anything wrong."

Mr. Jordan knew that one couldn't report from Baghdad with integrity: That's what his op-ed piece is about. Maybe he fails to realize, just as Ms. Aaron failed to realize in 1991, that reporting has no value apart from its integrity, and reporting of no integrity has negative value. But the truth may be simpler: It may be the disease of dateline-itis. As Mark Steyn wrote last week: "What mattered to CNN was not the two-minute report of rewritten Saddamite press releases but the sign off: 'Jane Arraf, CNN, Baghdad.' As Jordan acknowledged, this squalid trade-off cost real lives."

And that's bad news.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: easonjordan

1 posted on 04/27/2003 7:08:49 PM PDT by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freedom44
Journalists in bed with Dictators

?......Again....?

2 posted on 04/27/2003 7:10:39 PM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maestro
Have been wondering what type of watch, car, bank account Jordan received for his silence.
3 posted on 04/27/2003 7:16:03 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
I am amazed that anyone thought the truth was/is reported from any country that has state ruled press.The fact that they were paying off some reporters is a real slam on journalists' integrity. I am aware ..and so are many in America that agenda driven reporting is rampant.
4 posted on 04/27/2003 7:17:36 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
The fact that all reporting from dictatorships is censored is the reason all dictoratorships end up being worse that the average person believes.

The equivalence that news agencies pay to dictatorships is so damaging to those oppressed masses. It is precisely this equivalence that makes the UN such a pernicious instituition. While I might depise Chirac and De Villepin, I know that for good or ill, they represent to current truth of French society. Tariq Aziz represented only the opinion of Saddam Husein.
5 posted on 04/27/2003 7:24:40 PM PDT by dwswager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dwswager
That is a good point.Castro is another example.
6 posted on 04/27/2003 7:27:06 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
Everyone should read this one:

Saddam's Cash

From deep in the article we have this:

______________________________

In July 1998, "a committee was formed to improve Iraqi propaganda in the region. It would establish relationships and provide financial support to Arab journalists . . . as well as other Arab journalists in Europe. The Iraqi Intelligence Service, which sat on the committee, was instructed to increase financial support to journalists controlled by Iraq."

Two years later, apparently not satisfied with the work of the existing propaganda mechanism,

Saddam created another committee under [Tariq] Aziz, to expand and improve media operations worldwide . . . by financing . . . friendly newspapers and other media outlets, giving the owners and workers awards and monthly salaries, and bringing them to Baghdad to coordinate. The Ministry of Culture and Information, IIS, Baath Party and the Iraqi Press Association, which is headed by Uday Husayn, were represented on the committee.

7 posted on 04/27/2003 7:30:14 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Where is Saddam? and where is Tom Daschle?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
A good mob boss does the same with lawyers, accountants, etc. Make them dirty in exchange for loyalty.
8 posted on 04/27/2003 7:32:18 PM PDT by pacpam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pacpam
And to add to it, Saddam said he'd expose France if they quit protecting him.
9 posted on 04/27/2003 7:34:14 PM PDT by pacpam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
Had "journalists" in Iraq back in 1991 been filing truthful reports about Saddam being hated among his people and reported on the uprising against him in a way that told the true story of what was going on, I wonder if citizens of the US and the US Government would have been in a better position to support that uprising and actively help in it. Several hundred thousand people died because we were not motivated to directly support them in their efforts, and meanwhile CNN is filing reports on Saddam's birthday party and spouting his propaganda.

And Ted Turner refers to Murdoch as a warmonger ...
10 posted on 04/27/2003 7:37:40 PM PDT by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Fox and MSNBC were not covering the war at one point today so I briefly had CNN on. Saddam may be gone but Christiane Amanpour is still carrying the torch.

11 posted on 04/27/2003 7:39:05 PM PDT by cyncooper (thousands of cheering Iraqis yelled, "America, America, America," and "Bush, Bush, Bush.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
Every time CNN reports from a totalitarian run country, there should be a disclaimer scrolling across the bottom of the screen, "The report you just heard was entirely written by the despots running this country and should not be construed as the truth."
12 posted on 04/27/2003 7:39:51 PM PDT by zerosix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maestro
Yeah, not much new here. Check out the thread 'dark side of the moon' and find the discussion there about the NY times reporter Walter Duranty who was stationed in Moscow during the Stalin years.
13 posted on 04/27/2003 7:47:41 PM PDT by plusone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
Journalists in bed with Dictators

And Eason Jordan is gonna be the bitch.

So9

14 posted on 04/27/2003 7:53:53 PM PDT by Servant of the Nine (We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
If you want to see the latest posting of Castro's propaganda ministy's press releases, look at the CNN website.

I guarantee you that all local staffing at the CNN Havana office are Secret Police agents.

Nothing wlll found on the CNN website about the 75 Cuban independent members of the press imprisoned for up to 30 years, for such crimes as owning a "counter-revolutionary book."

15 posted on 04/27/2003 7:54:58 PM PDT by friendly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
"What mattered to CNN was not the two-minute report of rewritten Saddamite press releases but the sign off: 'Jane Arraf, CNN, Baghdad.' As Jordan acknowledged, this squalid trade-off cost real lives."
16 posted on 04/27/2003 7:58:23 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
Wait a minute! That's not right. Castro is not a dictator, he is a leader of the people. A fine man who freed his country. So, the very, very tight relationship that most of the old media types have with Fidelito and his regime doesn't fit in this model.

Hell, Fidelito provides cigars to many of the top media guys and asks absolutely nothing in return. It is what a friend would do. Fidelito's enlightened leadership is what causes the Dallas Morning News to run a front page story every other Sunday that praises Castro and his wonderful country.

No, the leftist media ignored the execution three days after trial of three Cuban criminals, not because the coddle Castro, but because the deceased guys said some really mean things. Oh, maybe an evil guy like Pinochet, but the relationship of the old media with leaders like Castro and, maybe, Mugabe

17 posted on 04/27/2003 8:13:13 PM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
Robert Scheer makes will into the six figures annually, has a yacht and has a much larger ecological footprint than any 10 families combined.

Just imagine what CNN, LA Times, Washington Post and NY Times currently know about Yassar Araft, Osama, Castro, North Korea, Assad, etc etc.


18 posted on 04/27/2003 9:37:39 PM PDT by Kay Soze (France helped Osama Bin Laden kill 3,000 US citizens in New York on Sept 11,2001.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
"The question is, why report from places like Baghdad?"

CBS's Dan Rathers, CNN's Peter Arnett, CBS's Betsy Aaron, ABC's Bill Blakemore NBC's Tom Aspell- their motivation is the exact same as the Dictators.

News Orginizations do it for CASH AND PRIZES.

And at the expense of those in the prisons being totured mutilated, killed and dismembered.

19 posted on 04/27/2003 9:49:34 PM PDT by Kay Soze (France helped Osama Bin Laden kill 3,000 US citizens in New York on Sept 11,2001.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson