Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time to unshackle Iraqis from the tyranny of UN sanctions
The Scotsman ^ | April 28, 2003

Posted on 04/27/2003 6:04:27 PM PDT by MadIvan

FRANCE last week called for the suspension of sanctions against Iraq. This apparent magnanimity in defeat was hailed a breakthrough by the usual suspects who opposed the war in the first place and therefore hardly have Iraq’s best interests at heart. In fact, the French concession is a lot less than it seems. For a start, it proposes only the suspension of sanctions. Since the tyranny against whom the sanctions were directed has been swept away, plain folk will rightly ask why the sanctions are not being abolished altogether.

More important, the Franco-Russian price for suspension is leaving the United Nations in control of the current oil-for-food programme, under which the UN has supervised oil sales and purchases of civilian goods since 1996. The Russians want the entire programme put directly under the control of Kofi Annan, the UN secretary general. All of this would be good for France and Russia - but a disaster for the Iraqi people.

The UN’s handling of the oil-for-food programme has been an international scandal. A supposedly charitable effort meant to relieve the suffering of ordinary Iraqis, it has been shrouded in secrecy to disguise its descent into corruption and disgrace - a $100 billion effort that did plenty for Saddam, France, Russia and the UN but precious little for the people it was meant to help. The UN even skims a 2 per cent commission on every barrel of Iraqi oil sold, supposedly to cover its administrative costs; in reality, more than $1 billion has poured into UN coffers for the benefit of the bureaucracy, freeing it from seeking finance from UN members and allowing UN officials to remain largely unaccountable.

Mr Annan had the power personally to approve any shipments to Iraq that were not on the approved list. He had a strange idea of what starving and sick Iraqis required, agreeing to the import of boats and boat accessories from France (for the benefit of Saddam’s cronies) and sports supplies from Lebanon (for the benefit of Saddam’s elder son, Uday, who presided over Iraqi sports). Even on the brink of war, the UN general secretary signed off on a shipment of broadcasting equipment from Russia.

The UN’s secrecy is breathtaking. Over $12 billion in proceeds from the programme is held by the UN in a BNP Paribas account in Paris. Nobody is allowed access to the accounts or to see details of transactions, such as letters of credit. Even the Kurds in Northern Iraq, who are entitled to 13 per cent of the programme’s revenues, are not allowed to know how much interest is accruing on the $4 billion owed to them. They have been denied access to the figures.

This is the system that France and Russia wish to perpetuate - a system General Tommy Franks has accurately described as "oil-for-palaces" - because it keeps their snouts in the trough. The Russians have even had the gall to insist that the UN should not lift sanctions permanently until the Security Council is "certain whether Iraq has weapons of mass destruction or not". This is the same Russia that did everything possible to lift sanctions even after Saddam had forced the weapons inspectors to flee; indeed, in 1999 Moscow refused to support a resolution renewing weapons inspections.

Now that Saddam has gone, Russia is suddenly worried about the weapons, even to the extent of delaying Iraq’s economic recovery.

This is hypocrisy of a high order, and the United States and Britain must have nothing to do with it. They should immediately submit a short resolution to the Security Council abolishing sanctions. Last week’s Washington Post was clear what it should be: "Whereas the sanctions were imposed on the regime of Saddam Hussein; whereas that regime is no more; whereas sanctions are now needlessly preventing Iraq’s economic recovery; the sanctions are hereby abolished." France and Russia should be dared to veto that. If they do, then the UN will be finished.

With the sanctions gone the oil-for-palaces programme can be ended. The US and Britain should announce its replacement: all future oil revenues will be placed in an account held by the Iraq Central Bank but overseen by either the World Bank or the International Monetary Fund to be used for the benefit of the Iraqi people. This time the process should be transparent and honest.

It is time to let the oil flow and the rebuilding begin. The US and Britain have liberated Iraq from tyranny. It is time now to liberate Iraqis from unnecessary sanctions and a corrupt oil-for-food programme. France and Russia can play a part too: if they really want to help Iraq towards freedom and prosperity, they can start by writing off the loans they made to Saddam. They supped with the devil and there is no reason the new Iraq should be saddled with repaying the loans they willingly made.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: blair; bush; iraq; iraqcentralbank; oilforpalaces; saddam; sanctions; uk; us; war
Outstanding!

Regards, Ivan


1 posted on 04/27/2003 6:04:28 PM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: alnick; knews_hound; faithincowboys; hillary's_fat_a**; redbaiter; MizSterious; Krodg; ...
Bump!
2 posted on 04/27/2003 6:04:41 PM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"The UN’s secrecy is breathtaking."

And it pales when compared to their criminality.

3 posted on 04/27/2003 6:07:15 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
A supposedly charitable effort meant to relieve the suffering of ordinary Iraqis, it has been shrouded in secrecy to disguise its descent into corruption and disgrace

Yes. I would like to see criminal charges brought against the administrators of this massive fraud.

They are disgusting.

4 posted on 04/27/2003 6:14:54 PM PDT by cyncooper (thousands of cheering Iraqis yelled, "America, America, America," and "Bush, Bush, Bush.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Agreeded. The UN along with the axis of weasels, is the co-conspirator in Saddam's gangster empire. Remember, it was the UN in charge of distribution of the profits for the oil for food program, not Saddam. How many dead Iraqis is the UN's criminal negligence responsible for over the last twelve years. I do know the infant mortality rate skyrocketed to one of the highest levels of any nation on Earth during this time. And we think Scott Petersen is a monster for killing his pregnant wife. Because medical facilities were starved for resources (Saddam and UN needed those palaces and playboy castles in and out of Iraq), thousands of Iraqi women died giving birth, along with their newborn children. When is ANY UN official going to be arrested and tried for these crimes. We need a second deck of cards containing all the UN officials, starting with Kofi Annan as the Ace of Spades.

"The love of money is the root of all evil"

5 posted on 04/27/2003 6:15:34 PM PDT by Russell Scott (Globalism is just another of the myriad of false religions that lead to tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I know, let's let the french keep the 20 billion that's in their bank. We'll just confiscate $20 billion in assets here to give to the people of Iraq.
6 posted on 04/27/2003 6:21:13 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russell Scott
We need a second deck of cards containing all the UN officials, starting with Kofi Annan as the Ace of Spades.

And he dares to glide around with that sanctimonious air.

7 posted on 04/27/2003 6:22:48 PM PDT by cyncooper (thousands of cheering Iraqis yelled, "America, America, America," and "Bush, Bush, Bush.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
MASTER LIST Useless Nation's Oil for Food scam + galloway
8 posted on 04/27/2003 6:23:18 PM PDT by GailA (Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"The US and Britain should announce its replacement: all future oil revenues will be placed in an account held by the Iraq Central Bank but overseen by either the World Bank or the International Monetary Fund to be used for the benefit of the Iraqi people. This time the process should be transparent and honest."

That is exactly what needs to be done....and why the Axis of Weasels will fight it. I suppose it's those who are directly or indirectly benefiting from the oil for palaces program who have stopped writing gloom and doom scenarios about Operation Iraqi Freedom, and started writing pieces on how this war was illegal or complaining that the streets of Baghdad aren't paved with gold yet.

9 posted on 04/27/2003 6:56:34 PM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"The US and Britain should announce its replacement: all future oil revenues will be placed in an account held by the Iraq Central Bank but overseen by either the World Bank or the International Monetary Fund to be used for the benefit of the Iraqi people. This time the process should be transparent and honest."

That is exactly what needs to be done....and why the Axis of Weasels will fight it. I suppose it's those who are directly or indirectly benefiting from the oil for palaces program who have stopped writing gloom and doom scenarios about Operation Iraqi Freedom, and started writing pieces on how this war was illegal or complaining that the streets of Baghdad aren't paved with gold yet.

10 posted on 04/27/2003 7:01:05 PM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Sorry about the double post!
11 posted on 04/27/2003 7:10:56 PM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
We're looking at this the wrong way. Sanctions were against Iraq, not the US. Iraq is now a country which is under the protection of the US military. The US is entitled to sell all the oil it wants on the world market, and can pump it out, load it and send it as it wishes. THERE IS NO GOVERNMENT IN IRAQ and hence, no one who is under sanctions.

After we leave, and an Iraqi government is formed and begins operation, that government may have to straighten out the whole sanctions issue, but for now, it's not an issue. THE US IS FREE TO IMPORT AND EXPORT WHATEVER IT WANTS TO AND FROM TERRITORY UNDER ITS CONTROL AND GOVERNANCE.

Let the French stew on that for a while.

12 posted on 04/27/2003 8:23:57 PM PDT by Defiant (The Frogs can French kiss my derriere!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
What I can't figure is why none of this comes from the US press. If it weren't for the Telegraph, my international perspective would be totally eclipsed.
13 posted on 04/27/2003 9:24:03 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russell Scott
"The love of money is the root of all evil"

Not to mention the root of capitalism and
what it takes to get some people out of the
bed in the morning.  Love of power is more
evil than love of money.
14 posted on 04/27/2003 9:25:54 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Better Title:

Time to unshackle Americans from the tyranny of the UN.

Thanks for all the good stuff, Ivan!

15 posted on 04/27/2003 9:29:38 PM PDT by Delta 21 (GOD....Guns.....& Guts -- It takes all three to be FREE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Outstanding article from the often very liberal Scotsman.

I have bookmarked it for the data it has re the plundering of the Iraqi Oil for Food Program. This scam benefited the UN and every country that stood against Regime Change in Iraq. The losers were the Iraqis.
16 posted on 04/27/2003 10:38:54 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Being a Monthly Donor to Free Republic is the Right Thing to do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; Shermy; BOBTHENAILER; seamole; Miss Marple; Ernest_at_the_Beach; backhoe; GailA
Some excellent data from the Scotsman re the plundering of the Iraqi Oil for Food program.
17 posted on 04/27/2003 10:43:45 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Being a Monthly Donor to Free Republic is the Right Thing to do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Thanks for the alert!
18 posted on 04/27/2003 11:27:11 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Where is Saddam? and where is Tom Daschle?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
When will the Iraqis get their money held in French bank accounts ?
19 posted on 04/28/2003 9:26:01 AM PDT by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson