[sinkspur]

If the supreme court decides this case wrong, we'll have gay marriage nationwide within a year, a la Roe v. Wade.

The Defense of Marriage Act says otherwise. Regulation of the institution of marriage and regulating what unmarried adults do in their bedrooms are two entirely different things.

[The Old Hoosier]

The Defense of Marriage Act

...will be ruled unconstitutional, discriminatory against the new protected class of homosexuals under the 14th amendment. You're handing America over to the deviants.

Whether you like sodomy laws or not, you cannot support this kind of judicial activism.

[Salman]

If the supreme court decides this case wrong, we'll have gay marriage nationwide within a year, a la Roe v. Wade.

The Defense of Marriage Act says otherwise...

The Defense of Marriage Act hasn't been constitutionally challenged yet. I don't say it will lose, but it will be challenged.

[Kevin Curry]

The Defense of Marriage Act says otherwise.

The Defense of Marriage Act may easily be found unconstitutional by a simple extension of the precedent from the Texas sodomy case. Gay/lesbian activists are breathlessly anticipating the development.