Posted on 04/25/2003 7:20:21 AM PDT by Pyro7480
In the run-up to the liberation of Iraq, conservatives were tempted to say the entire anti-war movement represented nothing more than a conglomeration of Stalinists, Castroites and Islamists. Such a description would not do justice to the "peace" movement: it would omit the role of vicious anti-Semites. FrontPage Magazine recently exposed the neo-Nazi Bill White’s Overthrow.com ("The Bottom of the Barrel"), but giving White a run for his bile is one Bruce Alan "Vincent" Breeding, a professional anti-Semite and sometime Satan-worshiper whose life’s purpose lies in fighting the Jews. "No War for Israel" (NoWarforIsrael.com), the love child of Breeding and recently incarcerated Klansman David Duke, demonstrates the disturbing continuity and convergence of neo-Nazis, Islamists and the anti-war movement.
Resume of Hate
In his mid-30s, Breeding already has an impressive resume for the hate movement. As a Tampa-based regional organizer for National Alliance, the hate group whose leader’s writings inspired Timothy McVeigh,1 Breeding helped bring Holocaust denier David Irving to the United States. When David Duke unsuccessfully sought the seat of disgraced Speaker of the House Bob Livingston, Breeding joined Duke’s staff and has been with him ever since. In 1999, he launched the Nationalist News Service, which dispensed daily news bulletins with hate-twinged commentary ala Bill White. NNA operated as part of Stormfront.org, the leading racist propaganda clearinghouse on the internet.2 Breeding’s most recent gig, under the pseudonym "Vince Edwards," was running EURO (European Unity and Rights Organization), through which David Duke swindled his followers out of thousands of dollars he later concealed from the IRS.3 In this capacity, Breeding administered the Duke-owned website "MartinLutherKing.org," a website that defames the slain civil rights leader’s memory.
Nazis for Peace
David Duke tried to reinvigorate his career by seeking to capitalize on the "peace" movement’s momentum with a anti-war speech in Virginia. As a preparation for the speech, Duke, noting the Left’s penchant for gathering unverified information from "alternate media" sources, commissioned Breeding to launch "No War for Israel" (NoWarForIsrael.com) on February 5. Its few original articles (just six in all) offer red meat to die-hard leftists. For one thing, MLK Jr. aside, they share a common hagiography. Breeding prominently features an angelic picture of Rachel Corrie, with a link to her diary entries. The photo’s caption: "Martyr for Peace."4
The contribution of "Brigadier General" James J. Martin, a longtime Holocaust denier associated with the Institute for Historical Review,5 amounts to little more than a familiar litany of leftist talking points, in which he rattles off 30 Chomskyite charges against the state of Israel, such as:
"Q.What country in the Middle East refuses to pay compensation to people whose land, bank accounts and businesses it confiscated?
"A. Israel.
"Q. What country in the Middle East seized the sovereign territory of other nations by military force and continues to occupy it in defiance of United Nations Security Council Resolutions?
"A. Israel."
The website also lists the UN’s resolutions condemning Israel (all of them non-binding, incidentally). This moral equivalence - or in many cases, condoning of Islamist violence - is the Left’s stock-in-trade, here appropriated without alteration by the hate-filled fringe.
An article by Anver Suliman of the Pretoria-based Islamist website Media Review Network and an anonymous article on the site both claim the forces behind the war are - surprise! - Jews. Suliman bases his "analysis" on statements by The Nation Jason Vest, Chris Matthews and Pat Buchanan that "George Bush has become a 'client' of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon."
The anonymous article cites the supposedly disproportionate influence of "pro-Israeli Jewish lobbyists" within the Cabinet. This pathetic piece, which still lists White House persona non grata David Frum as a Bush speechwriter, apparently sees mischief springing from the perfidious Jewish influence of such "top" advisers as Brad Blakeman (White House Director of Scheduling) and Christopher Gersten (Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Administration for Children and Families at the Department of Health and Human Services). Everyone’s favorite Jew - Collin Powell - is also listed among the worthies. The author goes on to claim "the Israeli lobby" created the Monica Lewinsky scandal "to force (Clinton) to launch ‘Operation Desert Fox,’ in December 1998"!
Even the remaining title of the lone remaining article, "The Oil Racket and Greater Israel," recalls the peaceniks’ mantra "No Blood for Oil!" Author "Eduardo S.B." declares "the truth behind this war campaign has everything to do with the ideal for a greater Israel and its growing manipulation of oil interests." Eduardo’s only other known writing was publish by the Vanguard News Network, a semi-literate hatefest website, whose frontpage recently referred to young Jewish girls as "ovenworthies."6 Eduardo embellishes this mainstream leftist thesis by claiming the Jews are the biological children of Canaan, who adjured them, "Love each other (i.e. of this tribe only), love robbery, love lewdness, hate your masters and never tell the truth." Given the leftist depiction of wicked Israeli "racism," "theft of Arab land," "deception" and "human rights abuses," one can hardly see a meaningful difference besides the sterile veneer covering the Left’s own anti-Semitism.
I Spread Lies with a Little Help from my Friends....
Breeding compensates for the dearth of original material on his site with host of links to "news" offered by leftist, Islamist and anti-Semitic websites. Although this is an unbridled hate website, it gets much of its fodder from left-wing organizations, linking to such far-left pillars as Indymedia.org, the World Socialist Web Site and Pravda (which has featured Bill White, David Duke and Justin Raimondo as columnists). So, too, does it draw from radical Islamist sites. Breeding links to at least seven Islamist "news" outlets, including the virulently anti-Jewish Radio Islam, the Palestine Media Center and a site delightfully titled ElectronicIntifada.net. Overt racists get a piece of the action, with NoWar linking to Overthrow.com, IHR and Vanguard News Network. Breeding also links to no less than six articles from Antiwar.com, including Justin Raimondo’s large archive of articles he’s written linking Israel with 9/11. (David Duke has done likewise.) NoWar’s current feature article is Pat Buchanan’s The American Conservative editorial, "Whose War," which Breeding has retitled "Meet Just a Few of Your Jewish Supremacist Warmongers."
Common interests? What common interests?
Breeding draws from a wide variety of anti-Jewish sources but has focused his marketing efforts on the Left.7 He has repeatedly targeted discussion boards provided by Indymedia, an expansive, leftist "alternative media" outlet popular among antiwar activists. In the typical response, a leftist would denounce the site as a "white supremacist sham" and post the "WHOIS" search for the website, showing David Duke’s ownership.
Some would find this kind of repudiation encouraging; I am not one of them. Why should any thinking adult need an ownership certificate to warn him off from a website named "No War for Israel," which contains multiple references to "Jewish supremacists" and features headlines like "Some Jews Can’t Wait for Bloodbath" and "Sick Jewish Humor"? The fact remains that although their motivations differ, the rhetoric and conclusions of radical leftists, Islamists and overt anti-Semites converge.8 How do Breeding’s shrieks of "Jewish supremacism" materially differ from leftist or Islamist denunciations of "Israeli apartheid"? Breeding and "progressives" part company on rationale, not effect: Breeding declares that American Jewish policy wonks (Perle, Wolfowitz) support Israel based on racial solidarity, while leftists claim American Zionism is inspired by money and intellectual imperialism. The difference? David Duke has to travel to Bahrain for his speaking engagements. The message those on the Indymedia boards send their fellow radicals rings clear: Don’t go to this website, not because they are bigots, but because they are the wrong bigots!
White Sheets And Black Robes
Although he exploits and attempts to merge with radical elements of the Hate America Left and Islamist movements, Breeding may also be motivated by the power of pure evil. Incredible as it may seem, all the aforementioned problems do not represent the full extent of Vincent Breeding’s pathologies: He’s also a Satanist.
At least, he played lead guitar for a "death metal/black metal" group (so named because of its exaltation of Satanism). Breeding lent his "talent" to no less than four CDs produced by a musical abomination known as "Acheron," lead by a "priest" in Anton LeVey’s Church of Satan. Breeding’s guitar work appears on all the group’s CDs between 1992-95, including their CD "Death is Only the Beginning #3," which includes the memorable ditty "Slaughterization for Satan." The band declares on its official website, "The Satanic Millennium approaches and ACHERON will unleash their diabolical creations to hasten the climax of Armageddon. The World is ACHERON's for the taking - they will seize it and drain its life-blood to the very dregs. Praise the ways of the Left Hand Path. Hail Satan! God is Dead!"
Breeding sang a different tune while protesting to preserve Mississippi’s Confederate-inspired state flag. He told a reporter he and other EURO-trash "plan to continue to spread our message of love, tolerance and the celebration of the diversity of Mississippi's beautiful Southern heritage."
Vince Breeding: Beacon of Love.
Perhaps in Breeding’s Satanic pedigree we glimpse the true motivating force of the Hate America Left and the anti-Semitic movement.
ENDNOTES
1. National Alliance grew out of the 1968 "Youth for (George) Wallace" movement. A university physics professor named Dr. William Pierce emerged as its leader, forging a Nazi-inspired movement at once both anti-Semitic and self-consciously anti-Christian. Pierce’s novel The Turner Diaries (written under his acknowledged pen name, "Andrew MacDonald") describes how its protagonists carried off a terrorist attack on a federal building when a homemade nitrous ammonium bomb planted in a parked delivery truck exploded at just after 9 a.m. Pierce went to his eternal reward on July 23, 2002.
2 . Breeding’s contact e-mail address for NoWarforIsrael is "vincent.breeding@stormfront.org."
3. Duke, renowned as a ladies’ man, has admitted using political donations for gambling in Las Vegas and the Bahamas. In a pathetic cover story, he told his followers he only did so because a friend had devised a system to "break the bank" and bilk the rich, casino-owning Jews out of their money!
4. The site also falsely claims Rachel Corrie’s last words were "No War for Israel." According to sources, her last words were, "My back is broken."
5. IHR was founded by Willis Carto as the Holocaust-denial apparatus of Liberty Lobby. Carto, publisher of the now-defunct conspiracy-monger tabloid THE SPOTLIGHT, is considered by many as the most influential anti-Semite in the United States. After declaring bankruptcy, Carto founded the American Free Press as THE SPOTLIGHT’s successor.
6. "Ovenworthies," from the Wednesday, April , 23, 2003, edition of VNN.
7. Another of Breeding’s official tips to troglodytes who wish to "Get Active" and promote the website: "Write nowarforisrael.com on a greased pig and put it someplace legal where people will notice." Mind you, this is the second promotional idea Breeding lists, right after making a banner. Breeding doubtlessly interacts with pigs more frequently than the average American.
8. Indeed, where else except within far Left and Islamist circles does one even hear the term "Zionist," almost universally used in those contexts as a euphemism for "Jewish supremacy"?
Ben Johnson is Associate Editor of FrontPage Magazine.
A: Because it doesn't exist.
His article primarily points out that among the malefactors of the anti-war movement, anti-Semites should be added to the list. "No War for Israel" sort of tips their hand. The rest is documentation.
Hardly. Horowitz makes all his connections and is more sparing in his use of adjectives. BJ says "Nazi" but doesn't show it. The only actual connection he takes beyond assertion is David Duke. He dsoesn't even show that the guy is having any effect on the lefty orgs, just says he is trying. Horowitz is much more meticulous and doesn't use adjectives to substitute for sources. BJ argues in the mode of a leftist ranter, no facts and a lot of volume and frothing.
Uh, what exactly did he say that was wrong? o_O
These groups didn't start their propaganda blitz simultaneously by coincidence.
Group-rights ideology lies at the core of the New Black Panthers, the KKK, Aryan nations, Hamas, and assorted lefty nutjob groups out there ... all of these groups rely on group identity to make themselves feel powerful, and to them, individual liberty is a threat as it allows people to choose to join groups or not join groups even if a group wants to assert its perceived "authority" over people it believes should belong to their group. Memebers of white supremacist groups - or black supremacist groups for that matter- are not content just to keep to themselves. They feel a need to force other white or blacks respectively to conform to their group ideology. Thus a white supremacist will persecute and harass whites who date nonwhites, and black racist groups will likewise persecute and harass blacks who date nonblacks. Both groups see intermarriage as a threat to the purity of their group. Thus black racists and white racists have far more in common than people think.
Palestinians terrorists behave the same way- they are driven to add members to their group and prevent members from leaving their group or adopting other identities, in order to appear strong by swelling their numbers and intimidating others so that none may dissent. Since Palestinian leaders are not so much racially or religiously driven as they are political, they have been able to assemble a larger base than black and white racists have been able to do. But while composed of many nationalities with little concern for racial makeup, the palestinians still retain an intimidating group rights mindset.
Islamicists are similar; they see people of other religions as threats to their group, because such people may draw off muslims from the group and convert them. Thus is believed to reduce the unity of the group, weakening it, and directly impact the Islamicists' goal to dominate the world both religiously and politically.
All of these groups fear individual choice...
So it is no wonder when they see a common threat to group rights ideology- and America is a threat to it - that they would put aside their other differences to preserve their groups.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.