Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Skywalk
My alternative, in the short run, would be preferable to cloning FULL humans right?

Wrong.

Deliberately tampering with a human being's DNA solely to be able to say "it isn't human, REALLY" is pretty despicable.

What happens if your instructions don't work properly, and you create a human being with a brain--even an atrophied vestige of a brain? Gosh, what the heck do you do? Throw it in the dumpster?

20 posted on 04/24/2003 2:48:52 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
Uh, how would tampering with the sample THEN cloning the sample(sans certain coding) be wrong?

You'd have a better argument if you said that you should not change the coding of a full human to an incomplete one.

As for if somehow something goes wrong, well jeez, if something goes wrong with anything I guess we should just sit still and not leave the house.

Somethin' might go wrong. BTW, are you a death penalty proponent?
22 posted on 04/24/2003 3:00:17 PM PDT by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson