Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Husker24
I don't know, this sounds like a bonehead move to me.

It is. Apparently the Chinese have forgotten the MX-Missile (Mobile-Experimental) of the Carter Administration. It was a bad idea from the beginning. Any railcar capable of carrying a missile that was capable of transcontinental range would be to huge and heavy for existing rail beds and rails. Even Carter could see it was dumb.

14 posted on 04/23/2003 9:17:49 PM PDT by elbucko ("Speak softly and carry a Laser Target Designator")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: elbucko
The DF-31 is a lot smaller than MX Peacekeeper. The rail-mobile version is more like the SS-24 "Scalpel" of the late USSR. They're not going to put 10-15 MIRVs on a single missile, which I believe is the payload range of the MX. For those super-massive ICBMs (i.e. SS-18), hardened silos remain the only realistic deployment option.
16 posted on 04/23/2003 9:24:26 PM PDT by Filibuster_60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson