[lilylangtree]

Trying to make up for the dereliction of duty revolving around the lack of reporting on clintoon's background. Otherwise, clintoon would have never made the prez in '92.

[ladyinred]

Could it be an unannounced Democratic senator with the initials HRC who is deeply disturbed about the money flowing to Kerry and would like to cut him down a notch or two? You decide. We report.

This REEKS of the witch in the blackpantsuit! Her MO exactly!

[Captain Peter Blood]

Anyone else find this funny that the Boston Globe, Liberal bastion of Bean Town and Mass. would be doing an expose like this? The question is why would the Left want to devour their own?
I personally don't care one way or another about Kerry, his so called Affairs or anything else about him. Wonder if the fine hand of Teddy Kennedy is behind this and if so why? Just who would the left be more interested in, Howard Dean perhaps? Inquiring minds want to know!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Mike Darancette]

John is going to get a catsup enema.

[CyberAnt]

These dems have no idea who they're dealing with in the likes of Hitlery. They are so blind they cannot see the evil right in front of them.

[SamAdams76]

Howie Carr once accurately described John Kerry as a "gigolo's gigolo". It's true. How many men can get dumped by a woman worth $250 million and end up with a woman worth $500 million on the rebound? And how many men can say that a girlfriend dumped him for a member of Pink Floyd? Say what you want about John Kerry but he's at least got better taste in women than Bill Clinton.

[woofie]

"'Baby,' he finally says, swaying ever so slightly in the breeze, 'I am ready right now to make a commitment. To you.'"

"Baby,let me fillibuster your caucus..."

[Moosilauke]

With all of this sleaze circulating, we're wondering who is helping to get it into print? The Globe, after all, is owned by the Democratic Party's paper of record, the New York Times. As the Romans asked, "Cui bono?" or "Who benefits?"

Well, let's see. NYT is not shilling for Dean or Edwards, so they are not the intended beneficiaries of the sleaze revelations. Everyone else has either dropped out or is hopelessly fringe.

Cui bono? Only the Clintons. But how? By making sure there's not an incumbent dem in the whitehouse in 2008? That seems quite a stretch. To put the party nomination in total disarray, requiring a selfless HRC to step forward and take the nomination "for the good of the party"? Makes sense to me!

[TommyDale]

This entire leak was orchestrated by Chris Lehane. He is the connection.