Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ModernDayCato
Wrong on all points.

It is the conservative "purists" who ushered in the Clinton presidency in 1992. If Bush loses in 2004, it will be the conservative "purists" who will likely usher in another Clinton presidency.

Wonder how your pet issues will fare under her reign. No, I don't.

But, that will be okay, huh? As long as it is a Democrat trashing the Constitution, that's okay.

115 posted on 04/19/2003 8:00:22 PM PDT by Skooz (Tagline removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: Skooz
Still waiting for your reasoned debate to my valid points. There won't be one, because you don't have FACTS (you know, the TRUTH) to back them up. All you and your ilk can do, over and over again, is mumble that we would do worse under Clinton.

This always makes me laugh, for two reasons: if this were happening under a Democrat president, you and your pals would be screaming your heads off (you would have somehow been able to get them out of the sand, or somewhere else). The other thing that makes me laugh is that Hillary WON'T get elected, no matter how many of us stay home. She's just not that electable.

And y'know, there actually is some truth to your statement: As long as it is a Democrat trashing the Constitution, that's okay [to me]. What you really mean to say is that As long as it is GW Bush, your hero, trashing the Constitution, that's okay [to you].

Let me save you some trouble. This is how these debates always turn out:

Cato: I don't really care all that much, because I have enough money where I can get out of the country when the time comes.

Skooz and pals: Don't let the door hit you in the @ss on the way out.

Cato: Yeah, but you'll miss my tax money that supports the bloated government of which you approve.


119 posted on 04/19/2003 8:08:29 PM PDT by ModernDayCato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

To: Skooz
Well, this conservative purist is going to bed. I don't post much on Free Republic anymore, because no one really wants to debate...you're all so delighted to have gotten rid of Clinton you don't understand that you're still the frog in the pot -- the heat has just been turned down from high to medium.
124 posted on 04/19/2003 8:21:51 PM PDT by ModernDayCato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

To: Skooz
Ha!
I came back to check this thread to see what was happening and, lo and behold!, the scumbag malcontents are feasting away! "Bush betrayed us!" "Bush is no conservative!" "Bush wants to ban guns!" "Not a dime's worth of difference!" "Blah blah blah!"

They get tired of playing with themselves over at Scumbag Underground and Puberty Forum so they stop by here to stir up mischief.

My advice, Skooz, is to not engage these mice in any discourse at all. It just plays into their hands, IMO. I think it would be best to ignore them until they end up back in their own little circle jerk.

Regards,
LH

125 posted on 04/19/2003 8:24:07 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson