Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marines may have broken seals on known radioactive material
Christian Science Monitor via Drudge ^ | Thursday, April 10, 5:48pm EDT | unnamed idiot

Posted on 04/10/2003 4:44:40 PM PDT by woofie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: piasa
I mean, all nuclear fuel. Low grade stuff may still be there.

Nice of them to leave some nice dirty bomb material there under seal.

41 posted on 04/10/2003 8:19:06 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: All
Looks like we have near our 10th false WMD alarm. I am sick of these false reports of finding WMD, feeling good only to have it shattered to pieces because nothing was really found of significance.
42 posted on 04/10/2003 8:20:23 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (God Reigns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
hmmmm

Perhaps this was found later? If not, then the UN is in a lie......
43 posted on 04/10/2003 8:22:03 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (God Reigns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: gkhong
The Marines are their usual walrus-like selves, always looking for a tight little seal.
44 posted on 04/10/2003 8:33:43 PM PDT by mathurine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kaboom
That's what I was thinking!
Like what would Blitzie take for a few spare seals?
45 posted on 04/10/2003 8:37:12 PM PDT by MIgramma (FEAR= False Evidence Alleged Real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: woofie
Yeah.... "Now, Mr. Ruthless Killer Do-anything-to-win-or-kill-your-enemies Hussein, this stuff is VERY dangerous and could be used to kill a lot of people, or make stuff to kill a lot of people. So you be a good boy and don't open it, kay?" Why not take it or dispose of it elsewhere? Seal it and leave it? Perhaps I'm just not liberal enough to understand this.
46 posted on 04/10/2003 8:38:11 PM PDT by kimmie7 (Time to take the gloves OFF!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimmie7
The IAEA is lying. This CANNOT be partially enriched or depleted Uranium that these Marines have found.

Note - Their (Marine) reports said that the material in drums was highly radioactive. First point - the Marines would know better than to open a drum. Second point - Uranium produces Alpha Particles/Radiation. It cannot penentrate even the thin walls of a paper drum. If this was Uranium in these drums (especially Yellow Cake (AKA Uranium Hexafluoride). It would not be readily detectable outside of the drum. Third point - unless things have changed radically in the military, the type of detection instruments these Marines would have would be for the purpose of detecting high energy Gamma Radiation (Gamma Rays). They would probably not be able to detect weak Alpha particles.

Therefore, if the Marine reports are true. Then the material in these drums would be more consistent with nuclear reactor wastes which would produce strong emanations of Gamma Rays. Reactor waste would contain Plutonium that could be extracted for weapons and other radioactive isotopes like Cesium 137 which would be a terrorist's dream stuff. Cesium 137 would be very effective in permanently contaminating land, water supplies, etc.
47 posted on 04/10/2003 9:51:41 PM PDT by Sola Veritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: woofie
Man, having that seal on it really did a lot to prevent Saddam from using it if he wanted to!! Thanks, UN, for just leaving it there.
48 posted on 04/10/2003 10:47:48 PM PDT by whadizit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
First point - the Marines would know better than to open a drum.

Would it be necessary to open the drum for a Geiger Counter to work?

49 posted on 04/10/2003 10:49:43 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: woofie
Don't we have access to a bazillion Iraqi scientists who have defected ? Wouldn't they be aware of this stuff ? Shouldn't they be giving us the straight skinny on it ?
50 posted on 04/10/2003 10:59:57 PM PDT by stylin19a (oh to die peacefully in my sleep like my uncle-not screaming in terror like his taxi passengers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woofie
No kidding. What poppycock. It's that notorious "unnamed source" spouting off again. Saddam didn't have any banned weapons, but if he did, it was plutonium, or maybe uranium, and the UN inspectors didn't see it, but if they HAD seen it, they would have tagged it although they're not saying they did, and therefore, it was the Marines who caused the problem by probably breaking seals that may have been on what didn't exist despite the large warning signs that would have said "DO NOT BREAK SEAL--HIGHLY RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS MAY BE HERE--OR MAY NOT BE" (sarcasm)...uh huh. Biggest cockamamie story of the day...
51 posted on 04/10/2003 11:00:22 PM PDT by MightyMouseToSaveThe Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gkhong
The Marines also broke the seals on numerous barrels of "whoop-ass"...

Oh, now, that's GOOD! They don't even buy it in cans. They buy barrels of it, in bulk, at Costco!

But they only buy "BUSH" brand, heavy-duty, nine-ply, industrial grade. (Sold at a Pentagon branch office near you)...

the infowarrior

52 posted on 04/10/2003 11:50:23 PM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Yes it would. Uranium only produces Alpha radiation/particles. Even if the Marines had instrumentation capable of detecting Alpha Ratiation, these detectors must be very close to the source of Alpha radiation (almost touching it). Alpha particles are totally ionized Helium nuclei that can only travel a short distant through air (not more than a few centimeters). They can be readily stopped by even a thin sheet of paper. Therefore, unless the drum was opened, Uranium inside would not be dectectable. Of course there could be residles on the surface, but this would not produce "high levels."

On the other hand, many of the radioactive isotopes found in reactor wastes are Gamma emitters. A Gamma (ray) is a photon very similar to xray. It would readily be dectected outside of the drums, and (with a sensitive enough instrument) at quite a distant. Even an old fashioned Geiger counter would be able to detect a high level from many feet away.

By the way, Geiger counters (and similar robust instruments) are what the military uses. Most standard NBC (nuclear, Bio, chem) units would not carry instruments capable of detecting Alpha particles.
53 posted on 04/11/2003 8:38:13 AM PDT by Sola Veritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson