Posted on 03/27/2003 8:28:33 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen
I watched with disgust as the daily Centcom briefing on the war for Iraq took place Wednesday morning. While there has been an obvious anti-American tenor from the press corps throughout Iraqi Freedom, the questions on Wednesday were so virulent that they are worth revisiting.
First and foremost, the majority of reporters did not have questions at all. The majority of reporters wanted to do nothing more than make a statement on camera, and then ask Brigadier General Vincent Brooks to address it.
One of these statements was the regurgitation of an Internet rumor that said Vice President Dick Cheney's daughter was on her way to Baghdad to be a "human shield."
One would think a reporter of the stature necessary to end up at a Centcom briefing would do a little background work before making such a statement, but here again we have another example of how the press corps need not even be professional if they are ideologically opposed to the war. I can guarantee you that neither the reporter, nor the outlet for which she works, will issue an apology.
A Canadian reporter wondered if the fact that Republican Guard troops were on the move meant that we had lost the war? Another reporter refuted the report that the port of Umm Qasr had been cleared of mines based on what he had heard from British troops. And yet another reporter asked if he could see video of all the bombs that didn't hit their intended targets.
Given the chance, almost all reporters at the briefing attempted to make General Brooks speak to their opinions, rather than answer their questions. The war has proceeded too quickly and all the Iraqi's haven't surrendered. Should we give up? Irregulars are fighting back. Were we prepared for that? Oh, and by the way, when can they get their water turned back on?
Isn't the fact that we will have to fight for Baghdad proof that the war isn't going as planned? It's Day Seven and we control half the country, isn't this a sign of failure? Will the families of Iraqi civilians be compensated by the United States? Are Iraqi POWs being treated humanely, or are we going to "violate their rights" like we did with Al Queda?
Amazingly, two of the only reporters who managed to ask a question about the actual state of the war were, believe it or not, French. It was obvious that the other reporters in the room felt that these press briefings were set up so that they could opine on camera to their misgivings about the war, whether real, imagined, concocted on the Internet, or posed by Iraqi intelligence.
While the issue of liberal bias in the press has never been in doubt for me personally, anyone willing to suggest that it does not exist should be forced to sit through a tape of this press conference. Interestingly, here are a few of the questions that were not asked:
How did the Coalition manage to save the Iraqi oil fields, and thus the future of the Iraqi people? Is there concern that Coalition POWs will not be treated in accordance with the Geneva Convention and thus must be rescued before they are executed? In 7 days, Coalition forces already threaten Baghdad - would you qualify this as a success?
Can we speak with some of the liberated Iraqi's that are now receiving U.S. aid? Does the fact that treatments for nerve gas and 3000 protective suits were found in an Iraqi hospital finally settle the issue of whether or not the regime has chemical weapons, or are we to believe these items were purchased by mistake? Does the sale of Russian technology to Iraq prior to the war cast any doubt on their motives for threatening to veto our action at the U.N.?
These and other questions were not asked, and are unlikely to be. This is because the majority of the press corps isn't in the region to cover the war, they are there to opine on it. What you are reading now falls under the category of "Commentary," which is why it is identified as such. Whether or not I write this column in my bathroom or at Centcom Headquarters, it is still commentary.
That so many press agencies and media outlets spent the money to fly their reporters to the Middle East to appear at Centcom Press Briefings is a mystery to me. By their actions and statements it is apparent that they could have written their "stories" in the comfort of their own homes since almost nothing they say or write has to do with anything other than their opposition to the war, and why the Coalition should surrender.
Members of the press have often whined about not having enough access or information during military operations. In this war their access has been unprecedented, yet many of them either refuse to see, or accept, that which is unfolding right in front of them.
Much like the antics of the smug and disrespectful Helen Thomas, their frustration stems from the fact that they are used to the privilege of redefining world events to fit their opinions. That option being lost now, all they can do is attempt to grand-stand in front of the camera like petulant teenagers while our military commanders soberly wait for them to remember the hard realities of war.
It's going to be a long wait.
(Sterling Rome is a former assistant to CBS News Special Correspondent Walter Cronkite.)
Sterling Rome
Of course, Dan Rather disproves my theory.
If you don't forward that idea to the Pentagon...I will. I'd pay cash money to hear R. Lee tear some a$$hat reporter a new one.
Excellent commentary by one who surely knows what he's talking about!
I have been so disgusted by these briefings that I can barely watch them. There must be some way to limit these people to the asking of questions, and prevent them from making the repellent, godawful propaganda statements they use to "preface" their so-called "questions."
The real purpose of the briefings is to disseminate the official US statement or position on the events of that day or the day before. This is to separate the facts from rumor, theory and misunderstanding. But the purpose of the briefings does not include revealing military strategy to the press in advance or defending already well known and well-publicized United States policy or strategy. Nor does it include providing a propaganda platform for a multi-national bunch of blow-dried media idiots.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.