[steplock]

No quite the same as US laws.

It is true that the bill as originally written was unconstitutional, but NOT by the whole.

Definition 5 of this bill:
Any organization which advocates or teaches the overthrow by force or violence or other unconstitutional means of the governments of the United States or the State of Arkansas.

By removing this wording from Arkansas Law, in effect makes this definition LEGAL. This is contradictory to U.S. Codes.

Do you want to go out there to Washington D.C. and publically form an army to overthrow our govt? How about inviting MEXICO to bring its troops (9000 on our border now) across the border to "encourage" communism?

Far-fetched?? I am starting to wonder.

[Servant of the Nine]

Definition 5 of this bill: Any organization which advocates or teaches the overthrow by force or violence or other unconstitutional means of the governments of the United States or the State of Arkansas.

By removing this wording from Arkansas Law, in effect makes this definition LEGAL. This is contradictory to U.S. Codes.

It is still a crime under Federal Law, which is where the case would be tried anyway. It is redundant law, just like an Arkansas law against counterfitting would be.

SO9

[StriperSniper]

"encourage" communism? Far-fetched?? I am starting to wonder.

Since it is obvious that that is the goal of so many, who is to say that that is not one vector of attack?

(Can one use 'that' four times in one sentence?)