Skip to comments.
CAPTURED FOES FOUND WITH CHEM-WAR GEAR
New York Post ^
| 3/25/03
| DEBORAH ORIN
Posted on 03/25/2003 1:42:18 AM PST by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:12:48 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
March 25, 2003 -- WASHINGTON - Some Iraqi troops had up-to-date chemical-weapons equipment when they surrendered - a warning sign that Saddam Hussein's forces are ready to use the dread arms, a new report says.
They had old guns but 2002 gas masks, chemical decontamination kits and atropine - an antidote for nerve gas, reported CBS correspondent Jim Axelrod, traveling with the Army's 3d Infantry Division south of Karbala.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: battleforbaghdad; illegalweapons; pows; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
03/25/2003 1:42:18 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks; CheneyChick; vikingchick; Victoria Delsoul; WIMom; one_particular_harbour; kmiller1k; ...
Thanks for cathcing this.

To: kattracks
If we should bomb a weapons cache - the stuff emits.
3
posted on
03/25/2003 2:20:33 AM PST
by
The Raven
To: The Raven
But Hans Blix said he couldn't find any, so that can't happen, can it?
To: Sabertooth
5
posted on
03/25/2003 3:02:29 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(Bu-bye Saddam! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
To: kattracks
Can't be, kattracks... Hans Blix told us that he hadn't found any chemical weapons... And that world opinion would go negative on Iraq and Saddam if they were ever used. This report must be false... </sarcasm>
6
posted on
03/25/2003 3:09:07 AM PST
by
ReleaseTheHounds
(The Iraqi's have not chosen wisely... now it's the time for the MOAB!)
To: Sabertooth
The latest infobabble from the news stations is that there is a line which allied troops will cross and the Iraqis will use chemical weapons. I have no idea if this is true or not but it does seem to go along with a strategy of getting allied forces so closely engaged with the Iraqis that we can not use tactical nukes in retaliation without massive civilian casualties. It also conforms to Saddam's past bluster. All in all I would say it is at least reasonably probable the Iraqis will use chemical weapons when we are fully engaged and about to enter Baghdad.
The question is "Will Iraqi supplied terrorists use chemical or biological weapons inside the USA in coordination with this use of Chemical weapons?"
7
posted on
03/25/2003 3:50:37 AM PST
by
harpseal
(Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
To: harpseal
The latest infobabble from the news stations is that there is a line which allied troops will cross and the Iraqis will use chemical weapons. I think the term they are using is "tripwire".
Be prepared, now that "shock and awe" is passe, to hear "tripwire" a million times an hour.
8
posted on
03/25/2003 4:21:02 AM PST
by
TomB
To: harpseal
It would be a big gamble for them to use WMD. They might hope that the devastation would be so great that the public outcry in the U.S. would be to evacuate--that it wouldn't be worth the risk to our soldiers to continue. By holding off using them but with the threat there, they are buying time--time for the coalition to fall apart or some other world event to divert our attention.
But if the Iraqis are cornered like rats with no possibility of escape, I think out of blind rage and hatred, they would resort to a scorched earth plan, killing themselves, any civilians who happen to be in the way and as many allies as they could.
9
posted on
03/25/2003 5:18:22 AM PST
by
randita
To: kattracks
"They had old guns but 2002 gas masks, chemical decontamination kits and atropine - an antidote for nerve gas, reported CBS correspondent Jim Axelrod, traveling with the Army's 3d Infantry Division south of Karbala."
First, start with where these masks and kits are coming from and then work backwards and you will find who our friends really are that are assisting this enemy!!
To: kattracks
Question regarding some of the possible chemical agents that might be used... are they "heavy" enough to stay around once deployed? Or is it being witheld at the moment due to reported desert winds and sand storms that might blow the stuff back right at the Iraq troops?
Thanks.
To: Sabertooth
Thanks for the heads up!
To: Xphantasos
Question regarding some of the possible chemical agents that might be used... are they "heavy" enough to stay around once deployed? It completely depends. Some agents are persistent (stay active for a while), while other non-persistent ones don't last long at all once dispersed.
13
posted on
03/25/2003 5:56:17 AM PST
by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
To: Sabertooth
Thanks for the ping...
14
posted on
03/25/2003 7:43:12 AM PST
by
GOPJ
To: kattracks
How is them wearing chem suits NOT a smoking gun?
15
posted on
03/25/2003 7:44:12 AM PST
by
smith288
(Visit my gallery http://www.ejsmithweb.com/fr/hollywood/hollywood.php)
To: kattracks
bump
16
posted on
03/25/2003 7:45:27 AM PST
by
finnman69
(!)
To: Coop
Thanks for the info.
To: kattracks
no, not them. they don't have any chem weapons.
didn't hans and the french assure us of that?
sickening!!
To: faithincowboys
KSFO radio in San Francisco just reported uranium was found hidden in a swimming pool north of Baghdad. I do not know if it is true, I just know KSFO reported it.
19
posted on
03/25/2003 8:56:31 AM PST
by
Mark17
To: Mark17
How could this happen? mohammad el baradei said the iraqis were pure. well, whatever mohammad says must be true.
i am puking all over my keyboard right about now!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson