Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vp_cal
Perhaps we can slow the pace down while we secure our supply lines, bomb the enemy lines,and get more troops.

Going static would have disadvantages of its own. It might be better just to pierce their line and make a bull rush for the center of Baghdad. Right into the middle of the rats nest. Or that might be bad.

I am still not discounting something like the left hook of the Gulf War. I am hoping that we are as surprised as the Iraqis at how this plan goes about. We have got smart people working on this and I am thinking that a straight on slugfest may not actually be the main event.
37 posted on 03/24/2003 7:52:33 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Arkinsaw
>>>I am still not discounting something like the left hook of the Gulf War.<<<

Where would the left hook go? Sooner or later you have to face whatever is in Bagdad, or sit outside and lay siege and starve 'em out.

I heard some military guy on FOX saying that the plan is to surround the city but stop short of going into Bagdad, and then let Spec. Forces start cleaning out the pockets of resistance. Damn, I hope it works - but it will be nasty work.

59 posted on 03/24/2003 8:05:30 PM PST by HardStarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson