Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Will Force Japan to Withdraw From UN
Weekly Post (S.Korea, Japan) ^ | 3.24.03

Posted on 03/23/2003 6:44:45 PM PST by Enemy Of The State

Bush Will Force Japan to Withdraw From UN


Japanese international journalist Nobuhiko Ochiai said, "With the Iraqi war this time, Japan will be forced to perform on the center stage of the world." Mr. Ochiai stressed that President Bush's declaration of war against Iraq will decide the future of Japan.

After the Iraqi war, Japan must face the crisis of North Korea. Mr. Ochiai contributed the following article to The Weekly Post.

1. Behind French Demands for Peace

The French government must stop its indulgence in power games. France has been performing opportunistically in its efforts at diplomacy. French President Chirac is one of the world leaders who made Dictator Saddam Hussein powerful.

In 1975, Chirac was the prime minister of France. He made contact with Saddam Hussein to promote a stable supply of oil from Iraq. He invited Saddam to his home.

Mr. Chirac received an order for constructing a nuclear power plant in Iraq. Why did an oil-rich country like Iraq need a nuclear power plant? The reason was that Iraq wanted to extract the plutonium needed to develop nuclear weapons.

Chirac and Hussein had been close friends since then. France sold Mirage jetfighters and surface-to-battleship missiles to Iraq. However, Iraq did not pay for those weapons. The transaction involved $5 billion, which is still outstanding today. If Saddam Hussein falls, payment will never be made.

Behind the French demand for peace with Iraq, there exists this kind of reason.

Also, the French have been preparing to rebuild Iraq after the fall of Saddam Hussein. French businesses have already signed contracts with Iraqi business people who are expected to be exiled but will become the center of Iraqi business after the war.

2. Useless UN

While the UN continues to engage in a 'party of chattering,' Saddam Hussein and Kim Jong Il have been preparing for terrorism. The UN embarked on solving civil wars in Congo, Rwanda or Palestine, but these all failed. The results were too little, too late.

So far, summit meetings with the leaders of Israel and Palestine have been held at the White House or Camp David, never at the UN.

One high-ranking government official from Israel remarked, "Our safety must be built by ourselves. The United Nations means the 'United Nothing.'"

When the US and British governments want to take strong action against Iraq, the proposal will be vetoed by a country which has veto power.

3. New United Nations

President Bush's ultimatum against Iraq was also an ultimatum to the UN.

If a war is between two countries, it can be prevented through diplomatic negotiations but wars with terrorists cannot. The UN is not the right place for discussing such war.

The US neo-conservative group of Americans including Richard Pearl, Chairman of the National Defense Council, who support the Bush Administration, are discussing the US withdrawal from the UN.

The US government pays $2.5 billion in contributions to the UN, which is equivalent to 20 percent of the total contribution. If the US withdraws from the UN, the UN will not be able to function. If Japan, which makes 20-percent contribution to the UN, joins in the US withdrawal, what will happen to the UN? One think tank of the US Republican Party has been studying how to build a new UN.

If the US, Japan and Britain agree to build a new UN, the old UN will disappear. The new UN will launch a policy not to allow rogue nations to become members.

No countries which have been opposing the military action against Iraq may have firm principle for opposition. If a new UN is built, they will rush to it.

4. Do Not Give Time to Dictator

Once the Iraq war ends, the same kind of operations must be taken against the North Korean dictator.

If the issue of North Korea is brought to the UN, China and Russia will push the subject to a dead end. It will face the same kind of situation as the Iraqi issue.

All nations must know how much time the 'chatter party' at the UN will give dictator Kim Jong Il. It will make the world more dangerous. The Japanese must learn deception from Kim Jong Il. Prime Minister Koizumi and Kim Jong Il signed the Pyongyang Declaration last September. Kim Jong Il seemed to have made concession, however, after the signing the declaration, Kim Jong Il did not take the right attitude to the Japanese.

When we look to take action against North Korea, it is impossible to consider it without the US. This is the reality. Therefore, to fight the Iraqi war with the US will contribute to the national interest of Japan. People who claim that sending an Aegis cruiser to the war is an indication of support the US operations is not correct. This is a war of the Japanese as well. Japan must do more.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Japan; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bushdoctrineunfold; japan; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: Enemy Of The State
Don't think I've ever used that many "'s to try to stress a point - but too many people think the Korean conflict ended.
The North and South don't think so.
61 posted on 03/23/2003 9:58:16 PM PST by RS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: reg45
>>Why do you guys insist upon calling it a WAR. It's NOT a >>war. It's THE ENFORCEMENT PHASE OF RESOLUTION 1441.

Oh goodness. In a sense thats what I was saying initially. I think war is just a term that people use loosely. I think military action would be a better term but I think there are some disadvatages to soldiers though when they are injured or killed in military actions that are not declared wars but dont quote me on that...It may only apply to those situations when they are under an action of the UN.

62 posted on 03/23/2003 10:04:57 PM PST by Enemy Of The State (Tell those F@#KERS with the laundry on their heads that It's wash day and we're bringing the maytag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Enemy Of The State
Not a big deal.. I think you just misunderstood me. You said you must of missed the declaration of war. I'm saying that from his view.. as well as should be all our views... We have obviously declared war on Iraq.. although it may not be formally approved in congress. The American people have spoken(with the approval rating) that we are indeed at war. I think the 2nd response to my post is best.. we need to redefine our defition of declaration at war.
63 posted on 03/23/2003 10:09:03 PM PST by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
The UN needs our money, Japan's and the UK's money to keep its doors open.

GW and Tony have whopped the head off of the UN Chicken. It is running around and acting like a chicken when seen at a distance. Soon it will start flopping and fall over.

This wide open criticism/condemnation of the UN and the French by Japan is something new for the post WWII Japan.

If you want to have fun with a moderate or liberal ask them how long the UN will last after their failure with Iraq? They go beserk or get the look of deer in your headlights.
64 posted on 03/23/2003 10:12:35 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
Lets not forget the UK, Spain, Italy, Poland and most of Eastern Europe with your proposed group.

Canada, Mexico and most of South America deserve each other. They and the other losers of the world can support each other in UN2.

What would you call an organization that went from the middle east to the Pacific, includes America, the UK, Spain, Italy and a lot smaller European countries?

65 posted on 03/23/2003 10:19:00 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Stamp out Freepathons! Stop being a Freep Loader! Become a monthly donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
..what would you call an organization that went from the middle east to the Pacific, includes America, the UK, Spain, Italy and a lot smaller European countries?...

The Freedom Coalition?

66 posted on 03/24/2003 3:52:45 AM PST by Byron_the_Aussie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: pave palestine
There are two articles here on FR, neither one of which I bookmarked, or I'd gladly post the link. I'll describe them, in the hopes that a freeper who saved them will post them:

1. A UN treaty which the US signed(and possibly ratified, but never really enforced) brought a public rebuke on the US by some UN POS (don't think it was KA). 'It' actually said that if a country signed a UN document, it was expected to adhere to it. This rebuke may have been deserved, not so much for the implication that UN 'laws' outrank our laws, but because our presidents have happily signed UN treaties that are in direct conflict with our laws thinking it's safe to do that as the UN has no way to force us to obey. Photo op treaty signing. Which I always feared could bite us in the butt, if the UN ever got its global taxation, global standing army, global supreme court...The treaty in question would have allowed any journalist or UN staffer to enter ANY US prison to speak to ANY prisoner...Why we ever signed is a mystery,but why we ignored the signature is obvious: That is not the way our prisons (especially level 2s and higher) are run!

2.Our patriotic senate one day sat down and ratified several dozen pending UN treaties pertaining to the enviromnment and especially desertification (which is listed in the MS declaration ). They did this when most of the senate was out over the weekend, by simple majority, without reading the documents aloud, and without recording who voted yay and who voted nay. This was in summer/fall 2000. Sounds impossibleto believe, but I remember reading several sulphurous threads about it right here.

67 posted on 03/24/2003 7:02:49 AM PST by kaylar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson