To: Cordova Belle
Last night I was watching Charlie Rose and he had Joe Biden (plagiarist) and Gary Hart (womanizer) and it seems to me the Dems are resigning themselves to the fact that the war is going well - now they are betting on a terrorist attack. Both, argued we shouldn't have attacked Iraq until there was no chance we would be hit at home by terrorism. In essence they are politically betting that we will suffer an attack.
Now I don't disagree that we may be hit, but the way the Democrats keep positioning themselves on the bet that bad things are going to happen to us is contemptible.
To: vastrightwc
As I noted in a previous post, most Democrats are pathetic-
...These two, along with the host, as well as the majority of the Media, are beneath comtempt. What they want more than anything is to tell America, "See, you should have not let the Supreme Court get away with handing the election over to this trigger-happy cowboy. We are your best and only hope for a war-free and peaceful utopia, where everyone is taxed up the whazoo, and we all have Hillary care and socialist uptopia." They're all chomping at the bit, believe me.
-Regards, T.
52 posted on
03/21/2003 8:26:31 AM PST by
T Lady
(.Freed From the Dimocratic Shackles since 1992)
To: vastrightwc
So what if we are hit domestically by terrorists? I think that's a positive thing in the big picture.
The terrorists are here. They plan, acquire, travel, recruit, and imbed themselves into our fabric. They are homogonous in America. When they act out, at least we deal with them.
Ignoring a terrorist does not mean they are not there! If this campaign smokes em out of their holes for targeting purposes, I think that's a good thing.
To not do what's right because a few hundred people who are in this country will strike out is exactly what fosters terrorism. Let's draw those few hundred out of hiding and send a message to any more who might want to come play Jihad on our turf.
60 posted on
03/21/2003 8:36:49 AM PST by
blackdog
("But that's what I do" A quote from my Border Collie)
To: vastrightwc
Both, argued we shouldn't have attacked Iraq until there was no chance we would be hit at home by terrorism. And that would be when? The tenth of Never?
77 posted on
03/21/2003 9:24:09 AM PST by
TigersEye
(Let the liberals whine - it's what they do!)
To: vastrightwc
Contemptible
Yes. But when has that ever stopped them in the past????
(sigh)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson