[Sabertooth]

Why do you seek to pick a fight over Grover Norquist? For what possible purpose is there? I'm not interested in the non-sequitor that you are trying to drag into this issue.

The issue here is Pat Buchanan's screed. Norquist was NOT dragged into this until YOU decided to stir the pot for no reason. I'm not interested in YOUR attempt to cause division on this forum.

Sorry, I thought the overarching issue was anti-semitism and those who are Undermining the War on Terror. You brought up the ANSWER orgs, didn't you? Buchanan's a fat and deserving target, but not the only one, by any means, nor the most dangerous.

It's remarkable, really, the lengths to which some have gone to ignore the issue, don't you think?

And this stuff about my "attempt to cause division on this forum" is really just an ad hominem designed to cover your unwillingness to grapple with the facts. What's divisive about trying to get the truth out? I've assumed that's why we're all here, but I've been mistaken before.

Don't ping me or bother me about this Norquist matter again.

[hchutch]

Grover Norquist was not even mentioned on this thread until you came trolling it with your spam post.

Norquist has NOT engaged in what is arguably anti-Semitism. Buchanan has. Norquist has not been publicly attacking Bush over his foreign policy or the war, or advocating the same policy ANSWER has. Buchanan has.

It seems clear to me that Norquist has NOT done anything, particularly since the war started, that has had any demonstrable adverse effect on the effort. Some people, though, have chosen to pursue a vendetta against him.

And as for your claim of an ad hominem, I claim truth as a defense. Next time, don't come trolling.

[Poohbah]

Saber, it's extremely bad form to drag flame wars from thread to thread.