Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jlogajan
Because: Southern rights were guaranteed by the Constitution.
Slaves had no rights, as they were considered "property".

Read the "Dred Scott" decision. That tells it all, plain and simple.
175 posted on 02/20/2003 4:04:52 PM PST by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: TexConfederate1861
Because: Southern rights were guaranteed by the Constitution. Slaves had no rights, as they were considered "property".

That's the "legal" argument. Not a moral argument. When the southern states seceded, the lost all Constitutional protection as well. Yet southerners gripe about their "rights" being violated. Clearly, Lincoln had not further legal obligation to the seceded states. Yet southerners still bitterly condemn the "immorality."

Can't have it both ways. If legal defines moral, then abortion is moral and anti-abortionists are acting immoral trying to oppose it. Etc etc etc.

183 posted on 02/20/2003 5:30:36 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson