Skip to comments.
Clinton: 'We must act now' [Unilaterally, if need be]
BBC ^
| Thursday, March 25, 1999
Posted on 02/07/2003 3:38:28 AM PST by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: JohnHuang2
His leadership is...
underwhelming...
That PISSANT is directly responsible for 9/11/01, and he has the stone cajones to say this???
I vote we give him an M-16, and force him to lead the charge into Iraq personally. Preferably, without NBC protective gear... If he breathes some rycin or anthrax...?
Well, it'd be one less scum-sucking bottom-feeder democRAT on the government tit...
To: JohnHuang2
He's not the president anymore...right...?
3
posted on
02/07/2003 3:55:54 AM PST
by
ShasheMac
To: ShasheMac
This is a flashback thread to illustrate Democrat/liberal media hypocrisy and double standards as regards military action. (Not that anyone should be surprised there is any, of course.)
To: JohnHuang2
Whew!
5
posted on
02/07/2003 4:04:07 AM PST
by
ShasheMac
To: ShasheMac
lol
To: JohnHuang2
Hypocrisy, anyone? Great find; I'm surprised that any of the leftist media still has this comparison available.
7
posted on
02/07/2003 4:22:13 AM PST
by
steveegg
(The Surgeon General has determined that siding with Al-Qaeda is hazardous to your continued rule.)
To: JohnHuang2
No hypocracy.
This is different.
Clinton was a Democrap. Bush is a Republican.
8
posted on
02/07/2003 4:25:29 AM PST
by
ZULU
To: steveegg
Thanks.
I'm surprised that any of the leftist media still has this comparison available.
What baffles me is why the heck aren't Republicans throwing this right back in the media's face? Especially in light of all the fixation with what the U.N. will do, what the U.N. will say, what our "allies" will think, etc.
To: ZULU
Clinton was a Democrap. Bush is a Republican. Precisely. The only bottom line that matters -- for Democrats and their marionette presstitutes.
To: JohnHuang2
Typical. The only time the left and or Democrats want to use US military force is when we have no National Interest in the outcome.
11
posted on
02/07/2003 4:27:45 AM PST
by
Kozak
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: JohnHuang2
That reminds me of a story in my local birdcage liner via the LA Times about the Al Qaeda camp in Iraq, and the RATs screaming about why we didn't put it out of commission last year.
13
posted on
02/07/2003 4:29:34 AM PST
by
steveegg
(The Surgeon General has determined that siding with Al-Qaeda is hazardous to your continued rule.)
To: Kozak
Correcto. Oh, and where were all the "peace marches" during all of this? Where were all the media polls showing how "conflicted and divided" the American people were about waging unilateral military action, sans U.N. approval? Gee, musta missed the news.
To: steveegg
Unfrickin' believable.
To: JohnHuang2
When he got finished with that speech he called the Secret Service into his office and explained that they must "act now", with or without UN permission, to acquire a month's supply of cocaine and women.
He explained that if they failed to do so "you will find yourself in the corpse position at Ft. Marcy Park". ;-)
16
posted on
02/07/2003 4:30:39 AM PST
by
cgbg
To: cgbg
lol
To: JohnHuang2
history to avoid revision bump
To: KSCITYBOY
Thanks for bumping...
To: JohnHuang2
Oh, the royal "we" must act now, eh? He never did when it was his turn, either when he was a young man or as "president". The big talk of a coward.
20
posted on
02/07/2003 4:35:07 AM PST
by
laconic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson