Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ZinGirl
I think you hit the nail on the head. I too watched the program and enjoyed it capitally (though I must admit to looking up the ending soon after the film began), and I believe the final factors for the Pentagon's selection of Lockheed were two-fold:

(a) the Lockheed craft was able to land vertically AND exceed Mach with the same configuration.
(b) the Boeing craft was butt-ugly.

20 posted on 02/04/2003 8:05:29 PM PST by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Petronski
the Boeing craft was butt-ugly.

LOL....and it took the JSF team a few years to figure out how to come up with the right wording to let Boeing down easy without saying, "but it's so ugly....there is NO WAY we want to look at that for 40 years".

23 posted on 02/04/2003 8:09:55 PM PST by ZinGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Petronski
DESIGN CRITERIA JSF:
(a) the Lockheed craft was able to land vertically AND exceed Mach with the same configuration.
(b) the Boeing craft was butt-ugly.


As read in Janes Defense Review? LOL
58 posted on 02/05/2003 10:15:23 PM PST by ffusco (sempre ragione)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson