To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
GW said he took the Hussein issue to the UN because he "wanted the UN to be something other than an empty debating society". I think he said it to illustrate their impotence and ineffectiveness in confronting military action when needed.
45 posted on
01/29/2003 11:05:41 AM PST by
prairiebreeze
(shrieking with glee after President Bush's MI speech)
To: prairiebreeze
We know exactly what he said. He's a pro-UN internationalist just like his father. He has no concern for his country's sovereignty. Just ask President Fox.
50 posted on
01/29/2003 11:11:39 AM PST by
inquest
To: prairiebreeze
"I think he said it to illustrate their impotence and ineffectiveness in confronting military action when needed."
And what happens if a day comes when the world unites against America? Global governance needs to be ELIMINATED NOW!
108 posted on
01/29/2003 12:59:23 PM PST by
ApesForEvolution
(This space for rent (Not accepting bids from the United Nations))
To: prairiebreeze
Right, but I repeat, what is Bush's objective in confronting the UN in that manner? To try to inspire them to do more? More involvement? Actual international (i.e. one world government)?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson