1 posted on
12/29/2002 8:59:44 AM PST by
scripter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: *Homosexual Agenda; Remedy; GrandMoM; backhoe; pram; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Long but informative.
2 posted on
12/29/2002 9:00:50 AM PST by
scripter
To: scripter
Forgot my standard links:
3 posted on
12/29/2002 9:02:30 AM PST by
scripter
To: scripter
The extent to which homosexuality is innate is not a matter of logic. It is a matter of science. If one assumes that there is a continuum in the degree of the preference, finding some ex gays proves nothing.
7 posted on
12/29/2002 9:17:12 AM PST by
Torie
To: scripter
Bookmarked for further reading and ammunition.
Thank you.
To: scripter
As to the Gay-Lefts normalization of homosexuality in the minds of sheeple by calling it a character trait like that of being black or Asian I can only say this....I have met many an EX-Gay, but NEVER an EX-Black or EX-Asian.
To: scripter
Scott Lively is the author of "The Pink Swastika" which is in its fourth edition. Go to www.AbidingTruth.com for Lively's web site. He's a personal friend who spoke at our DUMP DAVIS rally in Sacramento. What a humble Christian giant of a man!!!!!!!!! For victory & freedom!!!
To: scripter
"simple logic" that takes 30 pages to describe ain't to "simple".
To: scripter
Oh Lord, I wish I would have read this before the "out of the closet" arguement with my sister. Although, I did get this one in.
Sis-"God made me this way. How can it be wrong?"
Me- "Yeah that's what child molesters think too."
We need to understand that sexual deviation is just that, no matter how happy we make it sound.
As my darling Goddaughter says when speaking about her gay aunt, "Happy Pride!! and God help us all."
To: scripter
If this was posted in Canada you'd be in jail. Give Hillary time.
To: scripter
Absolutely excellent.
Well written and very informative.
20 posted on
12/29/2002 10:50:07 AM PST by
Mikey
To: scripter
Prenious to 1973 homosexuality was listed in the diagnostic manuals and texts as a serious mental disorder. It was delisted although about 70% of psychiatrists still beleived it to be a mental disorder. In successive years and generations increasingly few mental health professionals accept it as a disorder as sales movements from the media and homosexual liberation fronts have taken hold.
Most arguments for or against homosexual rights hinge on whwther or not homosexual9ity is viewed a form of pathology.
22 posted on
12/29/2002 11:13:48 AM PST by
RLK
To: scripter
Next time a title suggests it offers a "simple," solution, I'll pass it by. Geez, this guy's verbose.
23 posted on
12/29/2002 11:56:30 AM PST by
Rudder
To: scripter
whoever wrote this 'article' is a bigoted asshole who is trying to use 'big' words to cover up his obvious hatred of gay people. he needs to get a life.....and a brain wouldn't hurt either.
To: scripter
Very good article. I am visiting my oldest son near D.C. He and his wife have become friends with a homosexual couple that he works with. He wanted to debate me on the issue. He first wanted to argue that he doesn't believe it is sin. I just went right to much of what written in this article. He had to agree with me. They are no more born to this sick lifestyle then pedifiles, or perverts who desire animals.
To: scripter; EdReform
Consider: a person who remains unpersuaded by a reminder of the obvious truth has revealed himself to be an intellectual reprobate for whom facts are ultimately meaningless. What may be gleaned from this exchange is that one can never truly come to a common understanding with a "gay" sophist, since he or she cares only about winning and not about the truth. |
Yet there are many people who merely parrot "gay" rhetoric and who are really victims of sophistry, not sophists themselves. These people are persuadable. |
Why Abortion Isnt Important
Here is one of the (to my mind) greatest philosophers produced by England in the last century, telling people-especially other philosophers-that sometimes it is better to walk away than to argue. Why? Because a person's conscience can become so corrupt, and lead to such equally corrupt rationalizations, that to engage them in serious argument about those rationalizations is both pointless-being unlikely to have the slightest impact on their thinking-and, what is worse, dangerous-bringing the thinker of good will into serious danger of having his own conscience perverted by the sophistries of the other.
46 posted on
12/30/2002 6:55:33 PM PST by
Remedy
To: scripter
heterosexuality is immutable The second of the three traditions of the Royal Navy proves otherwise.
61 posted on
12/31/2002 10:17:12 AM PST by
steve-b
To: scripter
Don't allow your opponent to place the burden of proof upon you to disprove one of his or her assumptions.Can you prove that it didn't happen?
--Criswell, Plan Nine From Outer Space
62 posted on
12/31/2002 10:18:51 AM PST by
steve-b
To: scripter
Bump for later reading
To: scripter
I'm a Hater. A Homophobic Hater. Yea!
65 posted on
12/31/2002 10:36:21 AM PST by
johnb838
To: scripter
The Supreme Court recognizes minority status only for those groups which 1) have suffered a history of discrimination, 2) are powerless to help themselves and 3) are defined by immutable characteristics. Not true; "protected class" status has also been afforded to religious minorities, and religion is certainly mutable.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson