Skip to comments.Defeating Gay Arguments with Simple Logic
Posted on 12/29/2002 8:59:44 AM PST by scripter
click here to read article
[gobsmacking hypocrisy alert]
Notice also how one homosexual apologist drew heavily from the websites of several others, relying on research that was proven to be methodologically unsound. And how, even after this had been proven, she still posted the flawed conclusion from one of the methodologically unsound studies:
"...the adult heterosexual male constitutes a greater risk to the underage child than does the adult homosexual male."
And when her own tactics started closing around her neck like a hangman's noose, notice how the homosexual apologist took her ball and went home.
You mean like Jenny et al and Freund/Watson presuppose same-sex attraction doesnt apply to pedophilia like its its OWN UNIQUE GENDER? So where is the line
at age 12 from the AMA or age 13 from the APA? So at 12 ½ or 13 ½ its same-sex attraction and at 12 or 13 its NOT? Not to mention Jenny wasnt a random sample study and Freund doesnt define the age range for his sample. To consider a bisexual [homosexual] man who has same-sex relations with youth and but identifies as a heterosexual is absent of homosexual pathology is laughable; common sense has left the soft sciences in place of a political agenda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.