Skip to comments.
An Ancient Link To Africa Lives On In Bay Of Bengal
The New York Times ^
| 12-10-2002
| Nicholas Wade
Posted on 12/10/2002 1:09:21 PM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Click on the source for the rest of this article.
It just gets stranger and stranger.
1
posted on
12/10/2002 1:09:21 PM PST
by
blam
To: RightWhale; JudyB1938; #3Fan
Ping.
2
posted on
12/10/2002 1:11:32 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
That's more like it. 40,000 to 50,000 years ago is getting up to significant years. These wouldn't be related to those Irish sea peoples, would they?
To: blam
It is also possible, he said, that their resemblance to African Pygmies is a human adaptation to living in forests that the two populations developed independently.Big butts are an advantage in the forest?
To: eddie willers
Big butts are an advantage in the forest? Yes. The body needs to store its emergency fat reserve somewhere... in a cold climate, storing it widely around the body helps insulate the person, but in a hot climate, better to concentrate the storage on one place.
5
posted on
12/10/2002 1:21:43 PM PST
by
Rytwyng
To: eddie willers
Stop continental drift!
6
posted on
12/10/2002 1:21:50 PM PST
by
xJones
To: Rytwyng
Good point.
To: xJones
LOL!
To: Rytwyng
better to concentrate the storage on one place. Plus it gives the tigers a tasty little treat. ;o)
To: blam
It just gets stranger and stranger. Indeed. But it's only strange because of the assumptions made to date about human movement, and human abilities. If modern human beans have been around for 100,000 years, there's absolutely no reason to expect that they were stupid and sedentary for 90% of their history. Yet that's the apparent assumption.
Consider how little physical evidence there is of civilizations from 5,000 years ago, and then multiply the time span by 10 -- civilizations could have existed, and we'd be hard pressed to find them (or to distinguish them from newer ones....)
Now if you toss in a volcano bigger than the one that caused The Year Without a Summer in 1816, then you can kill off most of humanity, and destroy any civilizations that may have existed prior to the explosion.
10
posted on
12/10/2002 1:28:16 PM PST
by
r9etb
To: blam
Kinda looks like the College, we are all one, types are boming to my argurement about remnants. The out of Africa arguement lacks logical consistancy, id, we dug 'em there therefore that is where they started. BS.
Now, when they start to realize that the Minoan civilation was drenched in blood, expantionist, and warlike, my life will be complete.
To: RightWhale
"These wouldn't be related to those Irish sea peoples, would they?" The Fomorians? No, they were big and black. These folks are likely to be the origins of the legend of the Leprechauns.
Also, I wonder how their DNA will compare to the San Bushmen in Africa who are Mongols.
12
posted on
12/10/2002 1:28:49 PM PST
by
blam
To: r9etb
"Now if you toss in a volcano bigger than the one that caused The Year Without a Summer in 1816, then you can kill off most of humanity, and destroy any civilizations that may have existed prior to the explosion." I agree with your points.
When Toba exploded 75,000 years ago, some estimate that only 5,000 humans worldwide survived.
13
posted on
12/10/2002 1:33:43 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
When Toba exploded 75,000 years ago, some estimate that only 5,000 humans worldwide survived." A more likely explanation for the "lack of evidence for modern humans" is that most of them were living on coastal plains and along river estuaries. The "big thaws" from the LAST episode of global warming then put the evidence 150 meters below the ocean's surface.
To: balrog666; Condorman; *crevo_list; general_re; Gumlegs; jennyp; longshadow; PatrickHenry; ...
Ping.
15
posted on
12/10/2002 1:46:32 PM PST
by
Junior
To: r9etb
But it's only strange because of the assumptions made to date about human movement, and human abilities. If modern human beans have been around for 100,000 years, there's absolutely no reason to expect that they were stupid and sedentary for 90% of their history. Yet that's the apparent assumption.
Heh! You typed in my response, just about verbatim.
16
posted on
12/10/2002 1:54:43 PM PST
by
NukeMan
To: Wonder Warthog
"A more likely explanation for the "lack of evidence for modern humans" is that most of them were living on coastal plains and along river estuaries. The "big thaws" from the LAST episode of global warming then put the evidence 150 meters below the ocean's surface." You'll get no argument from me or most on this thread on this point.
17
posted on
12/10/2002 1:59:59 PM PST
by
blam
To: r9etb
If modern human beans ...
:-)
18
posted on
12/10/2002 2:02:25 PM PST
by
scripter
To: Wonder Warthog
And then...there is thoroughly modern
Mungo Man who isn't related to anyone that is alive today.
19
posted on
12/10/2002 2:04:44 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
Now we can see the apparent origin of the "nga" (people in southern Thailand who have nappy hair and very dark skin).
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson