That's gonna leave a mark. ;-)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Perky One heads-up.
To: The Great Satan; Mitchell; eno_; Shermy; Fred Mertz; *Anthrax_Scare_List
Indexing.
To: an amused spectator
Gee, and I always thought I could trust the NYT. (/chiding)
Shall I switch my allegiance to VF? LOL!
The mainstream media is filled with so-called journalist.
To: an amused spectator; Poohbah; Miss Marple; Grampa Dave; mhking
Here's the thing, if there is a 70% probability that they met and a 30% probability that they did NOT meet, it's not too hard to make a bet as to what went down. Mohammed Atta probably did meet with that Iraqi intelligence officer.
Anyone want to bet what they were talking about? I do NOT think it involved which strip clubs gave the best lap dances, or to discuss the upcoming Star Wars movie.
5 posted on
12/03/2002 6:20:46 AM PST by
hchutch
To: an amused spectator
BUMP
To: an amused spectator; hchutch
Any article the NY Slimes prints about the war on terrorism, president Bush, the economy, global warming, any enviral story and so called political polls should be labeled as pure fiction, fantasy and DNC Mantras posing as a news article.
To: an amused spectator
I take it Katie had the heavily-hyped original story on her list of pro-Saddam talking points, but somehow her researchers "missed" the humiliating retraction that the NYT sneaked out a few days later. Just as Howell Raines intended. Raines always reminds me of a piece of glistening, wet, freshly-excreted doggy poop standing on two legs. A real piece of work.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson