Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/23/2002 2:51:50 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Travis McGee; Squantos; RightOnline; harpseal; sneakypete
Thought you all may find this interesting...
2 posted on 10/23/2002 2:53:12 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Future Snake Eater
'Excuse me! The army couldn't afford drapes? I'll be up at the crack of dawn here!'
3 posted on 10/23/2002 3:05:52 PM PDT by billorites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Future Snake Eater
Great. The 10th Mountain Div can't handle altitude. Maybe they should go back to the mountains...

Camp Hale, Colorado where the 10th was founded is at 9500 ft. Nearby mountains go to 14,000. Fort Drum is what, 600?

Yeesh.

6 posted on 10/23/2002 3:29:36 PM PDT by 5by5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Future Snake Eater
Great post, thanks for the information!


7 posted on 10/23/2002 3:32:51 PM PDT by HiJinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Future Snake Eater
bump for later (needed) reading.

btw, can you say where this came from, or vouceh for it's authenticity?
8 posted on 10/23/2002 3:38:14 PM PDT by fnord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Future Snake Eater
The 10th Mountain Division is based at Fort Drum in New York. Heelllooo! There aren't high mountains in New York. They should be moved to the Rocky Mountains and based at least at 6,000 feet.
10 posted on 10/23/2002 3:44:39 PM PDT by Jabba the Nutt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Future Snake Eater
I visited Camp Hale recently. It is still very much available. Beautiful valley. Perfect for training the current soft "mountain" troops.

Btw, I went from sea level to altitude for the first time last year and experienced only minor indigestion and occasional shortness of breath. Had no problems climbing the many 12-14k mountains around there.

12 posted on 10/23/2002 3:53:34 PM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Future Snake Eater
Interesting. Bump. Assume you took notes? :)
17 posted on 10/23/2002 5:12:11 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Future Snake Eater
""Bunch of guys" had Acute Mountain Sickness."

I've had this. Occurred around 10,000 feet. Felt all the symptoms: sweating, faintness, racing heart, nausea, dizziness. This is NOT a fun experience. Water is very essential in preventing this, believe it or not (maybe something to do with blood pressure at high altitudes. I don't know...).

19 posted on 10/23/2002 6:47:25 PM PDT by redhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Future Snake Eater
D: Soldier load was from 75-110 lbs. Many felt they had too much weight to move efficiently in that terrain at that altitude. Rifleman carried between 10-14 30 round mags plus 2 mortar rounds. Saw gunners carried around 1600 rounds and M240 gunners around 1200. Three days of rations and water were packed along with the assortment of cold wx gear, batteries, etc.

A radical redesign and rethinking of clothes, armor, and LBE is needed. Anything held close to the body and immobile is going to be easier to hump than something floppy that zigs when you zag.

Perhaps everything should be designed around the body armor. A cavity on the inside for an IV bag and water bladder. Also space for a kife/survival kit/extra magazine. Stuff you want with you at all times, and can keep warm with body heat.

On the outside, standardized attachment points (something other than alice clips) that take modular pouches, racks, radios, etc. Perhaps the only thing on straps might be some sort of ruck that can be dropped for heavy action. Everything else is the kind of stuff you want to stay on you in a firefight.

I don't have all the answers (or even all the questions), but it seems like we could be close to some sort of revolution in combat gear.

20 posted on 10/23/2002 7:00:54 PM PDT by 300winmag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Future Snake Eater
Can someone explain to me what he means when he says *cotton kills*??
22 posted on 10/23/2002 7:22:57 PM PDT by WIladyconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Future Snake Eater
interesting.
26 posted on 10/23/2002 9:41:37 PM PDT by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Future Snake Eater
Thanks for the post. The guys I talked to say they were out of shape, ill equipped, and had far too much to carry. They almost had their rears handed to them and we are lucky they didn't end up in real trouble.

It seems they only train once a year away from NY and that's not at any great altitude.

27 posted on 10/23/2002 9:51:45 PM PDT by HoustonCurmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Future Snake Eater
When discussing sleeping systems, the article mentions that none of the men wore cotton tshirts to bed because "cotton kills." Anybody know what that means?
40 posted on 10/24/2002 6:53:10 AM PDT by Basil Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson