Replies

Please let me know if you want off my ping list.

To find all articles tagged or indexed using Homosexual Agenda, click below:
	click here >>>	Homosexual Agenda	<<< click here
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)

Only "four or five" said they wouldn't mind homosexual, same-sex mentors for their children

That's "four or five" folks who need a serious ass-whoopin'!

Sounds like the Owensboro, KY chapter has the right idea. Since the chapters raise their own money, why pay the $5,500 per year for nonsense like this?

The link for the World Magazine article listed above will change with their next issue. This should be the permanent link.

You mean to tell me there are other people out there who are unwilling to open a game preserve for pedophiles? Hope for a Sunday morning.

Another case of homophobes keeping upstanding fairies who really, really mean well from a great source of clean fresh meat. Hey, if society wants to curb the spread od AIDS in this country, one good way is to make uninfected boys available to mentoring fairies. Where do these fairies get the power to force what was once a well respected organization to change and risk jeopardizing even a single child? Statistics won't mean anything to the boy or the parents of the boy first molested by a mentor. We were supposed to be able to trust priests, weren't we?

You know, I understand the concept that just because someone is homosexual does not make them a pedophile. That said, there sure seem to be plenty of legal efforts by the homosexual lobby to allow them unsupervised access to young children. Boy scouts, Big Brothers, etc. Why, of all things, is this such an important issue in that community? As a catholic I have to say I'm not too pleased with the way that worked out in my church and I'm less pleased that it isnt getting fixed. I certainly dont want to see that kind of trauma spread to other noble institutions.

It's not about what is best for the children, it is about exposing them to as much deviancy as possible.

"Another director said he is "very concerned about putting children at risk" of molestation by homosexual mentors. While the organization still has rules forbidding the matching of girls with men mentors because of the potential for molestation, the new rule permits homosexual men to mentor boys."

Let's not forget that girls are at risk if they are mentored by lesbians. As was shown in the thread "Meet 'Women's Auxiliary of NAMBLA'," lesbian pedophilia exists in significant numbers. While the rate of lesbian pedophilia isn't as great as "gay" pedophilia at the moment, it is a growing problem.

Seven Steps to Recruit-Proof Your Child

Pedophilia Documentation

Is This Gay Behavior Sick?

bttt

Talk about homo-phobia. Come on, we all know how well homosexual prists behave themselves! Open up BB & BS, and the Boy Scouts! What's the worst that can happen? Duh!

MARK A SITY
http://www.logic101.net/

...new directive from national headquarters requiring them to allow homosexuals to mentor children of the same gender...

Well, this is certainly the end of 'Big Brothers Big Sisters' - - they have decided to propel themselves right down the toilet simply to appease the sodomy lobby and the Democrats. The objections of a few brave (but anonymous) people will not be enough to save the organization now, unless they act as quickly and decisively as The Salvation Army did last year.
And to think, I almost gave them a car.

"I love you, Homer."
And I love you too, Pepsi."
"Pepe."
"Whatever."

Only "four or five" (of 65) said they wouldn't mind homosexual, same-sex mentors for their children...

The fact that it isn't ZERO really bothers me.

Another big win for the trial lawyers. Here's the dilemma for Big Brothers: either (1) deny "gay" Big Brothers, in which case you are sued to death for discrimmination (which should entail big punitive awards, especially if the case is venued in Mississippi or Alabama) or (2) wait for the first molestation (a certainty) and get sued to death (more big punitives--it's for the children--wherever jackpot justice reigns). Pick your posion--but die they will.

The national organization has argued that children are at no greater risk of being molested by a homosexual than by a heterosexual.

They can say this with a straight face after what happened in the Catholic church??

One local affiliate in Owensboro, Ky., has already resigned its affiliation with the national office and changed its name to "Quest for Kids."

All affiliates should now be exploring this avenue.
Why don't you all follow Owensboro's lead, resign and band together.
Start the new national org."Quest for Kids".

...a new directive from national headquarters requiring them to allow homosexuals to mentor children of the same gender...
Sounds like the leadership of the Big Rothers/Sisters is headed by perverts.
If you have the power to do so, get the children out of the organization now, before they end up being molested.

Brothers up in arms

COVER STORY
| The wholesome image of Big Brothers Big Sisters of America is now under siege—and some local affiliates are fighting back. Their executive directors note that BBBSA forbids matching girls with men because of the potential that sexual attraction will lead to molestation—so why should homosexual men be matched with boys?
| by Lynn Vincent

WHEN BIG BROTHERS BIG Sisters of America (BBBSA) in July announced its new policy of requiring local affiliates to allow homosexuals to mentor children of the same gender, a brief media storm ensued. Reporters quoted lots of liberal-minded agency heads who spoke glowingly of lesbian and gay mentors under their charge.
Homosexual activists castigated conservatives for objecting to the new policy. And that was about it. Media silence followed the outburst, and it seemed that all involved with BBBSA were living happily ever after.

Not so. Under media radar, civil war has broken out in some of the BBBSA's 490 local affiliates, with at least a dozen executive directors of those groups defying the directive from the organization's national office. It's possible for them to do that because local affiliates are independently funded and managed, paying about $5,500 in annual dues for the privilege of using the Big Brothers Big Sisters name, fundraising machinery, and administrative support.

Dissenting executive directors asked WORLD not to reveal their names because members of their local boards of directors—who hold sway over the directors' jobs—are not all opposed to the new directive. In addition, these directors fear that stirring bad blood between them and the national organization would hurt any chance for compromise—and therefore, hurt the children and parents they serve.

Those directors say they are putting the interests of their clients ahead of the goals of the gay lobby. One Midwestern agency sent letters to the parents of 65 children on its waiting list. Only "four or five" said they wouldn't mind gay or lesbian mentors for their children, said the agency's executive director. Another local director told WORLD that "nearly 100 percent of the people who called us about this policy said, 'We don't want this.'"

The executive directors, one said, are also "very concerned about putting children at risk" of molestation by homosexual mentors. After all, BBBSA forbids the matching of girls with men precisely because of the potential for sexual attraction leading to molestation. How, then, is it sensible to match homosexual men with boys?

Finally, the directors are trying to be responsive to their donors. One BBBSA executive director noted that donations are down 10 percent since the national office announced its directive, "Standard 22." She said concern about the new policy has "zapped our energy and our focus. It's taken countless man-hours and time and energy away from what we all want to be doing and that's serving kids." The affiliate has already lost one staff person and one volunteer. Other volunteers have told the director they will not renew their commitments once their current match has ended.

Given such concern, one local affiliate, BBBSA of Owensboro, Ky., has already resigned its affiliation with the national office and changed its name to "Quest for Kids." With its new moniker came a new mission: matching kids with Christian adults who could not only model biblical gender roles, but also, with parental permission, teach kids about Christ. According to Quest for Kids board chairman Brad Rhoads, the group is now receiving donations from new sources—churches, for example—and has not lost any BBBSA donors that he is aware of. Also, a new wave of volunteers has rolled in, increasing the group's total number of mentors and therefore, Mr. Rhoads expects, the total number of adult-child matches that Quest for Kids can make.

Many other affiliates, though, are not specifically Christian in orientation, and are still hoping to work out a compromise with the national office. Several directors were scheduled to meet last week with national office representatives. "We're trying to see if anything can be done, if certain communities can be exempt," one local agency head told WORLD. "I have to represent my community, which is a rural, conservative community. At some point you have to say, 'That's enough.'"

Headquartered in Philadelphia, BBBSA has for 98 years provided adult mentors for kids. (Mentors are called "Bigs" and the children are called "Littles.") Each of BBBSA's 490 affiliates operates with near-total autonomy, adhering only to a set of general "standards of practice," which are meant to help children grow within mentoring relationships, while protecting them from physical or emotional harm. Local agencies appoint their own boards of directors, hire their own executive directors and staff, raise their own money, recruit their own mentors, and tailor their own local screening procedures to ensure mentor fitness. That's why Standard of Practice 22 hit like a bomb.

The Philadelphia office initially launched the bomb as a piece of routine paperwork. On Feb. 26, BBBSA national vice president and chief operating officer Clay Brewer issued a memorandum announcing the new policy. Local directors opposed to it soon made contact with each other and with public policy organizations they think can help. Executive directors and board members from Ohio, Kentucky, Virginia, Indiana, and Michigan contacted Focus on the Family, according to Focus psychologist Bill Maier.

These executives and board members were particularly concerned about the safety of the children under their care. BBBSA national, supported by gay activists and liberal media commentators, has argued that children are at no greater risk of being molested by a homosexual than by a heterosexual. But statistics logged in a stack of peer-reviewed journals undermine that claim. For example, the Journal of Sex Research found that homosexual pedophiles commit about one-third of the total number of child sex offenses in the United States, even though homosexuals make up no more than 5 percent of the U.S. population. While it may be true that most adult male homosexuals are attracted to other grown males, it is also true that pedophile themes abound in gay literature.

BBBSA has witnessed the problem directly in some affiliates. For example, in 1999 Tim Brown, a 34-year-old BBBSA mentor, sexually molested his 10-year-old Little Brother. America's Most Wanted featured his story in April 2001, and police apprehended Mr. Brown four days later. Also, the Keene, N.H., police department conducted a three-year homosexual Internet child pornography sting operation (1997-2000), which netted two Big Brothers, a 30-year-old advertising representative, and a 49-year-old college professor.

Just last month authorities charged Scott A. Wagner, 34, of Newark, Ohio, with raping a 12-year-old boy. The boy had been visiting Mr. Wagner's home as a client of Big Brothers Big Sisters of Licking County. On Sept. 27, a grand jury indicted Mr. Wagner on 73 child-sex-related charges involving young boys. Also in September, the Columbus Dispatch reported two molestation cases from 2001 that involved assaults on young boys by Big Brothers in Toronto and Newton, Mass.

Many more cases may be out there, but conventional media outlets are loath to report them. The lack of news coverage of those cases reflects conventional media support for the gay agenda. The day after the Dispatch reported on Big Brothers molesting Little Brothers, the Family Research Council sent to 130 national, family, and political editors in Washington, D.C., a press release recapping the story and questioning BBBSA's new policy on gay mentors. Not one publication picked up the story. Not one asked the obvious question: In light of these cases, is matching young boys with homosexual mentors really a sensible policy?

How the new policy came to be is still somewhat of a mystery. BBBSA's national office says that policy-change resolutions are discussed and formulated by local affiliates in the group's 12 national regions: "The top five resolutions, as determined by members of the National Forum, are forwarded to the National Board. In 2001 one of the top five resolutions dealt with nondiscrimination" against homosexual mentors. The process sounds very democratic. But no one at BBBSA will say who the "members of the National Forum" are, and how they determined that the resolution to accept sexual diversity among child mentors was among the top five.

The head of one local affiliate told WORLD, "So many directors I talk to say, 'How did that happen? I don't remember that being brought up.' Many issues go through that we are fully aware of all along the way, but this one was done and over before we even became aware of it." A BBBSA board member from an East Coast affiliate said, "I've been on the board of my agency for a couple of years. The first I heard [about the new policy] was when my wife heard about it on American Family Radio."

BBBSA's national office has refused to answer tough questions. Noreen Shanfelter, director of media relations for the organization, did not return three calls from WORLD. She stopped corresponding with Family News in Focus reporter Steve Jordahl when he asked how matching homosexual men with boys made sense. Nor has she returned calls from Focus on the Family's Mr. Maier.

The national office claims that it has had a nondiscrimination policy concerning homosexuals for the past 25 years, but only now has made it a requirement for local affiliates. Some local directors question that, especially since the national office has not produced documentation to support its claim. The dissenting directors speculate that the 25-year assertion may be a way of quelling protest, as in, "We've been doing this all along, so what's the big deal?"

Nor is the new policy a big deal according to conventional reporters, who have been ready to give BBBSA's new direction a positive spin. On Sept. 26, BBBSA of Sedgwick County (Kansas), an affiliate complying with Standard 22, held a mentor sign-up event called "Big for a Day." When a "married" lesbian couple showed up to volunteer, KWCH Channel 12 made it their top news story. "This year," said KWCH's Sky Arnold in his on-scene report, "Big Brothers Big Sisters has decided couples like Beth and Cathy Gillespie can't be turned away simply because they're lesbians." The camera then focused on two women. "Because she is my wife," said Beth of Cathy, "doesn't mean that I'm going to molest a child." Then the pair signed up to get a Little Sister.

But there are still ways to battle back. Terry Fox, pastor of Immanuel Baptist Church in Wichita, led a public protest against the Sedgwick County affiliate's new policy. His ground war generated protest e-mail from 42 states, and also resulted in the local United Way's allowing donors to opt out of giving to the Sedgwick agency. BBBSA directors not moved by arguments about child safety and parental assurance may pay attention to financial bottom lines.

"Our national office is trying to be really quiet about it," said one Midwestern BBBSA executive director who firmly opposes the new policy. "They're hoping that this will just go away.... We're trying not to let that happen."

After all, BBBSA forbids the matching of girls with men precisely because of the potential for sexual attraction leading to molestation. How, then, is it sensible to match homosexual men with boys?

And it's worse than putting heterosexual men with teenage girls - because, as the Catholic Church homosexual priest/teenage boy scandal has shown, homosexual men are far, far more likely to molest teenage boys than heterosexual men are to molest teenage girls. These people at the BBBS are out of their minds. This decision will inevitably lead to homosexual molestations of teenage boys. That will be on their consciences when it happens.

The national organization has argued that children are at no greater risk of being molested by a homosexual than by a heterosexual.

Sounds like they're headed down the same path as the RC church. Incredible how these queers and faggots manage to gain access to policy making positions within our institutions and use them to target children. We really need the death penalty here to begin regaining lost ground.