Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marines in fatal assault had no ammo
CNN ^

Posted on 10/09/2002 6:56:25 AM PDT by Bill Davis FR

Edited on 04/29/2004 2:01:24 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

When U.S. Marines were fired on by two Kuwaiti nationals during a training exercise Tuesday, they had no way of defending themselves, U.S. officials said.

The Marines were practicing urban warfare tactics on Failaka Island in the Persian Gulf and were carrying no ammunition for their weapons, U.S. officials said.


(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-122 next last
To: cynicom
The basic fact is that the young man is dead, is there going to be anyone held accountable for this death, or is this also covered in the manual. These people were allowed to drive right up to the marines with a pickup truck, with several weapons. If this is not acceptable in the manual, who is to blame for his death??? No one???

First, you're completely shifting your argument now. Your initial point was that it was wrong not to arm the participants in the exercise with live ammo, and that's the point I've been addressing. Don't try to saddle me with defending other positions I never took.

As for the NEW point you are now raising, the article really doesn't provide enough information to assess who should be blamed. And I'm not going to start blaming particular people without knowing all the facts. There are just far too many variables. For example: whether or not Kuwaitis were involved in the exercise, the geographic layout of the training area and its generally accessibility, the practicality of establishing an impenetrable perimeter around the training area, etc.

The mere fact that a Marine is dead does not mean that another Marine failed to do his job. After all, people do die in combat without it being anyone else's "fault".

81 posted on 10/09/2002 8:49:03 AM PDT by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

Comment #82 Removed by Moderator

To: MortMan
Mort...

A gentleman, thank you...

I have grown tired over these many years, having our young men murdered, in foreign countries, under hostile conditions. All to often, unarmed, no one accepts responsibility. I am sorry but their deaths are unacceptable to me. I would not want to be the one that had the job of telling his Mother the circumstances of his death. That a killer just drove up and shot him, but all the regulations were being followed to the letter. Sad...

Lest anyway wrongly believe I am anti military or such, I go way back, my brother never came back, I got home with my hide intact. When someone dies under such circumstances as this, I feel I have a right to question and condemn the military. We paid our dues, in full.

83 posted on 10/09/2002 8:51:38 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
CNN reporting: Pentagon: Al Qaeda linked to attack on Marines .
84 posted on 10/09/2002 9:03:35 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
OK, so on the one hand, you are unwilling to accept the risk that a terrorist will get into the exercise area and shoot at an otherwise unarmed soldier or Marine.

This happens very rarely.

On the other hand, you are willing to accept the chance of a soldier or Marine jacking live ammunition into their weapon during the exercise and killing themselves or someone else.

Given how often that happens when the exercise personnel take every measure to ensure that no one has live ammunition on their person in the exercise area, one can be reasonably assured that accidental discharges of live ammunition will be extremely common if every soldier or Marine is carrying some.

It's a matter of managing risk. You seem to be willing to accept a much higher casualty count as long as those casualties are self-inflicted.

85 posted on 10/09/2002 9:11:02 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

Free Republic. More Bang For The Buck!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

86 posted on 10/09/2002 9:15:47 AM PDT by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: fogarty
"And if there are Clinton holdovers, why has not Rumsfeld gotten rid of them?"

Clinton holdovers, are more dangerous than Al'Qida I believe..
How to get rid of them. Its almost impossible to fire/get rid of a fed.gov't employee because of the Federal Workers Party Union.. much worse than the longshoremen.. bcause their parasites on the treasury producing nothing.

87 posted on 10/09/2002 9:15:59 AM PDT by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fourdeuce82d
"I remember that from the army back at bragg- but there were a couple of guys in my platoon who always carried a couple of stripper clips in a cargo pocket. I wonder if the some of the EMs will start making that a practice, regardless of what the chain of command says"

Good way to get someone killed. That's why the chain of command CHECKS to make sure someone doesn't pull some boneheaded stunt. 11B10's - they're great Americans and wonderful kids, but a little adult supervision from a wizzened and wise NCO is always called for.
88 posted on 10/09/2002 9:22:55 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
Clinton holdovers, are more dangerous than Al'Qida I believe..
Thank goodness for your post. For a minute there I thought we had all forgotten that the important thing is to blame Clinton for the Marine's death.
89 posted on 10/09/2002 9:25:17 AM PDT by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Buck Turgidson
The allegation was reported by CBS at the time (in writing) and is also contained in the official DOD report.

CBS News | Standing Guard With No Ammunition? | November 14, 2000
Cole, but not the no-arms story

The two statements I made are not contradictory - SOME of the sailors had arms without ammo, OTHERS had arms with ammo (according to the official report), but the ROE prohibited first fire. This information is contained in the official report - which runs about 70 Mb in size.

90 posted on 10/09/2002 9:43:29 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: XJarhead
Thanks for injecting some reason and reality into the discussion. You know whereof you speak.

Looks like we're going to have to beef up security for our troops even in training areas. Sign of the times . . .

91 posted on 10/09/2002 9:45:27 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Buck Turgidson
Here is the Washington Post story:

USS Cole Sailors Told Not to Fire First Shot

I apologize for the snippy comment above, regarding the self-contradictory nature of my original post. You are correct, my original statement was far from clear. Let me know if you want a URL for the official DOD report. I don't have it handy. Snowe sent me the URL, AFTER September 11, 2001, and after I reminded her office that she had yet to make a substantive response to my November, 2000 inquiry to her regarding the Wash Post and CBS articles (I asked her if they were true).

92 posted on 10/09/2002 9:56:34 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: SLB
I've never liked training "off base" unless it was a walk through of a potential site where we may have had to respond. Reporters and casual observers have no need to see procedures or tactics of any military unit (Need to Know issue IMHO).

Deployed troops are sometimes required to make do for training. One must conduct such where all but participants are removed or disallowed and access controlled buy real world no BS security .

Not being knowledgeable of the layout of the training area or how many civilian caretakers are still on the military controlled island I'll just be glad the killers were removed from the gene pool. Hopefully a purge is being conducted of all non military personel who are there.

Stay Safe !

93 posted on 10/09/2002 9:57:59 AM PDT by Squantos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
someone dies under such circumstances as this, I feel I have a right to question and condemn the military.

You do have the right to question and condemn, although I believe condemnation in this case isn't warranted. The regulations are in place to avoid needless death. ROE are in place to avoid the US military precipitating needless deaths through action, as well as to avoid provoking "international incidents".

I agree that this letherneck's death is a tragedy, as well as a crime. I just don't believe that the criminal acts of two Kuwaitis should be blamed on what I consider sensible training rules. I would hate to be the commander tasked with calling their families. It is truly the most terrible job ever, in or out of the military.

94 posted on 10/09/2002 10:00:14 AM PDT by MortMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: XJarhead
"... Every non-live fire training exercise I ever organized or led began with checking each Marine to ensure that they did not have any live ammunition."

That's true.

95 posted on 10/09/2002 10:03:53 AM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Buck Turgidson
Please give a citation for your claim that the Navy security guards on the Cole had no ammo issued to them. The 2nd part of the statement above contradicts the 1st part.

The DOD report is off-line, while the DOD conducts a review of its contents. Probably a smart move, as the report specifically describes parts of the USN command and control hierarchy.

Site for DOD Cole Report

Freep mail me if you want to continue discussion re: contents of the official report.

96 posted on 10/09/2002 10:07:12 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

Comment #97 Removed by Moderator

To: Buck Turgidson
Thanks for the references. "Back when I was in the Navy", we were issued ammo but weren't allowed to load the weapon until we saw a threat. I bet the USS Cole had the same policy.

It's a shame that Marines in a training mission were attacked, isn't it?

My pleasure to provide the references. Aye, it is a rotten shame. I agree with the bulk of the posts in this thread though, live ammo is inappropriate for many training exercises, and it is too easy to be a Monday-morning quarterback.

98 posted on 10/09/2002 10:13:27 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
It is Marine, not marine. And how about we give some folks time to investigate what happened and stop acting like you who sit on couches have a clue.
99 posted on 10/09/2002 10:20:10 AM PDT by flyer182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
Good way to get someone killed

Stripper clips in a pocket?

not suggesting we make that part of the TOE for a non-live fire exercise, but I don't think they're that much of a threat, either.

100 posted on 10/09/2002 10:30:41 AM PDT by fourdeuce82d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson