Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Small Asteroid Could Be Mistaken for Nuclear Blast
Reuters.com ^ | 10/03/02 | Deborah Zabarenko - Reuters

Posted on 10/03/2002 4:24:29 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

By Deborah Zabarenko

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Even small asteroids that never hit Earth could have deadly consequences, because they might be mistaken for nuclear blasts by nations that lack the equipment to tell the difference, scientists said on Thursday.

One such asteroid event occurred June 6, when U.S. early warning satellites detected a flash over the Mediterranean that indicated an energy release comparable to the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, U.S. Brig. Gen. Simon Worden told a congressional hearing.

The flash occurred when an asteroid perhaps 10 yards in diameter slammed into Earth's atmosphere, producing a shock wave that would have rattled any vessels in the area and might have caused minor damage, Worden said.

Little notice was taken of the event at the time, but Worden suggested that if it had occurred a few hours earlier and taken place over India and Pakistan, the outcome might have been horrifying.

"To our knowledge, neither of those nations have the sophisticated sensors that can determine the difference between a natural NEO (Near Earth Object, such as an asteroid) and a nuclear detonation," Worden said.

"The resulting panic in the nuclear-armed and hair-triggered opposing forces could have been the spark that ignited a nuclear horror we have avoided for over half a century," he told a committee investigating the risk posed by asteroids and other objects that might collide with Earth.

SHOCK WAVES AND TSUNAMIS

Astronomers have long been concerned about damage from asteroids, meteors and comets, and since 1998 NASA has worked to identify 90 percent of all large near-Earth objects -- those with a diameter of .6 miles or more -- by 2008.

NASA's head of space science, Ed Weiler, told the committee that scientists have identified 619 of the suspected big, dangerous asteroids, which is about half the number astronomers believe are out there.

This kind of large asteroid hits Earth a few times every million years, and when it does, causes regional calamity. By contrast, a so-called doomsday asteroid 3 miles across -- like the one believed to have wiped out the dinosaurs -- hits once every 10 million years or so.

The one that caused the flash over the Mediterranean in June was probably about the size of a car, and was harmless to Earth. Such asteroids hit the atmosphere twice a month.

However, asteroids ranging from about 100 feet to hundreds of yards can cause serious damage, including spawning a powerful shock wave or a tsunami if it lands in an ocean, causing widespread catastrophe if the tsunami occurs near a populated shore.

These smaller bodies are not part of NASA's survey, and Worden suggested there might be an Air Force role in tracking these smaller objects, and also the potential for sharing early warning of incoming celestial objects with other countries that lack the technology.

Worden said the United States is unique in the world in being able to determine whether an incoming object is an asteroid or a bomb in less than a minute.

The United States spends about $4 million a year to track asteroids and comets, but very little on strategies to get them out of Earth's way, scientists said last month.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: asteroid; asteroids; astronomy; blast; comet; comets; mistaken; nuclear; science

1 posted on 10/03/2002 4:24:29 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
No comment? Or has everything been said?
2 posted on 10/03/2002 4:25:51 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
LOL
3 posted on 10/03/2002 4:27:43 PM PDT by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Got Nukes? :-| I'm stumped...
4 posted on 10/03/2002 4:28:03 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; RightWhale
Doesn't a nuke have side effects like fallout EMP etc an asteroid would not have( while increased dust in the atmosphere would be a side effect of an asteroid).
5 posted on 10/03/2002 4:29:12 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Obviously, immediate and unilateral nuclear disarmament is called for, to avoid an impending catastrophe. And while we're at it, get rid of SUVs and vigorously enforce the Kyoto treaty.

(I hope I don't need a sarcasm tag).

6 posted on 10/03/2002 4:30:49 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Yeah, that's it, Asteroid strike in Bagdhad!
It's our story and we're sticking to it.
7 posted on 10/03/2002 4:30:50 PM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Hey, Loose Lips!

Now you gave away our Iraq strategy!

"That wasn't a Nuke, it was a ... errr....um... ASTEROID! Yeah, an Asteroid! Here, check out this sattelite photo."

Regards

8 posted on 10/03/2002 4:32:00 PM PDT by Northeast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The Bubblebrains at Reuters are at it again.
9 posted on 10/03/2002 4:32:35 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weikel
A nuke would emit lots of short wavelength radiation such as ultraviolet and x-rays. An asteroid would emit ordinary light and heat. The energy of a photon is supposedly inversely proportional to its wavelength, and the nuke would have a lot more high energy reactions. Although the total energy could be the same for a small nuke and a large asteroid, the distribution of energy in the spectrum would be different.
10 posted on 10/03/2002 4:33:53 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
India and Pakistan have the equipment. I think that the author assumes that they would respond prior to getting any readings back.

Pretty unlikely.
11 posted on 10/03/2002 4:48:04 PM PDT by stalin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
What if it was an asteroid made from Uranium? That would definitly put out some energy?
12 posted on 10/03/2002 5:05:56 PM PDT by Winston Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
All true, but the nuclear detection satellite system is pretty much based on immediate visible light/flash detection for an immediate alert. Radiation effects and spectrum analysis comes after the initial alert (in some cases, well after). Not really a problem normally, but it could be a BIG problem in a tense situation. Like, for example, an atmospheric hit over Israel about 10 minutes after the bombs start landing in Baghdad.

We do need to get a better catalog of possible Earth-intersecting asteroids. This is not a major threat, but in the right circumstances it could be bad.

(Now, if we could just figure out how to redirect the asteroid INTO Baghdad...)

13 posted on 10/03/2002 5:07:56 PM PDT by AzSteven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: stalin
That wasn't a nuke. It was a meteor. How do I know. I slept at a Holiday Inn last night. Oh, yeah, this could work.
14 posted on 10/03/2002 5:11:23 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
How many more insane asteroid collision articles do we have to put up with? When was the last asteroid collision that might have been mistaken for a nuke?

ML/NJ

15 posted on 10/03/2002 5:20:30 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
How many more insane asteroid collision articles do we have to put up with? When was the last asteroid collision that might have been mistaken for a nuke?

Second sentence in the article:

One such asteroid event occurred June 6, when U.S. early warning satellites detected a flash over the Mediterranean that indicated an energy release comparable to the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, U.S. Brig. Gen. Simon Worden told a congressional hearing.

16 posted on 10/03/2002 5:34:41 PM PDT by e_engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: e_engineer
One such asteroid event occurred June 6, when U.S. early warning satellites detected a flash over the Mediterranean

Please!

I've actually seen the breakup of a hugh meteorite, and heard its sonic boom. (c. 1968) I never, for a minute, thought the Russians were attacking.

This article talks about an event witnessed only by earth satellites, and then worries about the reaction in third world countries that don't have satellites, and would never notice.

The unshaven people with towels on their heads are the threat, not asteroids.

ML/NJ

17 posted on 10/03/2002 6:11:38 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"Small Asteroid Could Be Mistaken for Nuclear Blast"

No comment? Or has everything been said?

Well, looking on the bright side, a large Asteroid couldn't be mistaken for anything else.

18 posted on 10/03/2002 6:16:02 PM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson