[VadeRetro]

However, that being my choice, I don't denounce others for it -- unlike someone who posts in blue.

I can understand remaining anonymous. But if you're going to criticize someone for hiding behind a pseudonym: 1) you should not be doing so, yourself, 2) the other person should be doing so, himself.

[PatrickHenry]

I can understand remaining anonymous. But if you're going to criticize someone for hiding behind a pseudonym: 1) you should not be doing so, yourself, 2) the other person should be doing so, himself.

The contradictions in that person's position on the anonymity issue are quite apparent. Not the first time he's been inconsistent (or wildly elliptical), I might add:

Of course he was a creationist. If he was a Christian he believed in a Creator.
There are no creationists. [but see above]
You [PatrickHenry] have been suspended several times.
The-Earth-is-old-and-Henry-Morris-is-right.
Wildly elliptical.
1⁷²⁰.
Nobel Prize for biology.
All discoveries disprove evolution.
DNA disproves evolution.
The fossil record disproves evolution.
Nobel Prize for creationism.
Genetic variation has nothing to do with evolution.