Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Living dinosaurs
abc.net.au ^ | 9/30/2002

Posted on 10/01/2002 8:32:43 AM PDT by SteveH

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 601-602 next last
To: <1/1,000,000th%
But he's a really good coder.

In that case, keep him away from the hardware, and you should be fine ;)

141 posted on 10/01/2002 8:24:28 PM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Some kind of imaginary superiority comlex...sub troll!
142 posted on 10/01/2002 8:25:18 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: All
I'm convinced...

cooling layers from the bottom!

No evolution---NONE

143 posted on 10/01/2002 8:27:25 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
was talking to a C++ programmer I work with who said that science was something he knew a lot about, and that Compact Discs were written and read magnetically.

Oh, man; that's REALLY bad.

Does he wear magnets in front of his eyes for reading glasses?

;-)

144 posted on 10/01/2002 8:28:17 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: SteveH
If this isn't about the lamest stretch of the imagination in pursuit of an agenda..
145 posted on 10/01/2002 8:33:28 PM PDT by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gore3000
It is a true statement. The only pre-cambrian multi-cellular animal is a worm. This does not explain the over 40 multicellular phyla that arose all of a sudden in the Cambrian.

Nope.

Ediacaria, Cyclomedusa and Hiemalora were not worms.

I'm surprised you're not quoting John Woodmorappe. He seems like someone you'd be interested in.

146 posted on 10/01/2002 8:37:06 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

Comment #147 Removed by Moderator

To: teresat
"Your cat looks exactly like my cat...well except my cat weighs 21 lbs..."

Timmy isn't very far away from your cat's weight. I believe the last time he went to the vet, he was about 20 1/2 lbs. This photo was taken about 3 years ago.

148 posted on 10/01/2002 8:46:13 PM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: All
overall the lower sub surface crust and plates formed from the bottom!

Rather quickly too---ruling out the mutation/morph theory!

149 posted on 10/01/2002 8:50:14 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: All
weenies!
150 posted on 10/01/2002 8:51:41 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: gore3000
bttt
151 posted on 10/01/2002 8:52:34 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: gore3000
bttt
152 posted on 10/01/2002 8:53:05 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
Ediacaria, Cyclomedusa and Hiemalora were not worms.

There were a few weird fossils which never made it to the Cambrian so they are irrelevant to the discussion. As I said, all this Vendian stuff had been discovered by the time that Eldredge and Gould gave up on Darwinian evolution - and for good reason. In fact, the latest major discovery in the field has been the discovery of a vertebrate fish in the Cambrian adding to the number of phyla which have no ancestry before the Cambrian. In other words, the doo doo is getting deeper, not shallower for evolution.

153 posted on 10/01/2002 8:57:54 PM PDT by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
Sedimentary levels in specific-smaller areas can form...miles deep---
Where are the sediments derived from? What if the sedimentary layers are thicker than the potential maximum height of the adjacent source area?
but overall the lower sub surface crust and plates formed from the bottom!
Seafloor crust is distinctly different from continental crust (basaltic vs granitic in a nutshell). How did seafloor crust get on continental crust in some areas? Why does currently existing seafloor crust consistently date younger than continental crust?
154 posted on 10/01/2002 9:46:32 PM PDT by Axenolith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
cooling layers from the bottom!
How did the outer core reliquify then? Why is the surface cooler than the Asthenosphere?
155 posted on 10/01/2002 9:52:48 PM PDT by Axenolith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith
I live in Hawaii and see a variety of 'lava'...

nothing is totally uniform---

for the appalachians type mountains to form the surface of the earth must have expanded....

via plates breaking up/cracks-shrinking---

width of the crack---width of the mountains---

triangular pointing up!

What plate tuetonics/earthquakes do is mostly unpredictable.

But their formation and the surface/layering is obvious...top first---layering from the bottom!

Only some/little surface layering from above!

Very young---FRESH-new Earth!

156 posted on 10/01/2002 10:13:22 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
but overall the lower sub surface crust and plates formed from the bottom!

Are you familiar with Thermodynamics? Heat does not pass from cooler to warmer. The only circumstance your assertion would allow for would be an earth in which the center was solid and progressivly warmer outward. This is demonstrably not true from seismic, volcanic, and thermal gradients from borings and mines among other things.

157 posted on 10/01/2002 10:18:21 PM PDT by Axenolith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith
The canyons would be different/same than the plates because as the plates cracked--widening...

the slope--triangle would be inverted---pointing down.

Not enough expansion---'lava' to form mountains!

Matter of 'fact'...the top layers would be the actual layers from the sides of the plate but the lower levels would be fresh layers pushed out from underneath to fill the widening cracks!

The diameter of the earth could be increasing and/or the plates just settling---sinking pushing the material up to form the canyon walls/layering!!

158 posted on 10/01/2002 10:32:58 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith
What about those diamond pipes?

The whole thermodynamics would say they were coming up from lower hotter levels---higher pressures!

159 posted on 10/01/2002 10:35:38 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith
Cooling would progress from the surface toward the center in blocks/plates---layers!
160 posted on 10/01/2002 10:39:59 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 601-602 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson