Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

V-44. The Pentagon’s next transport flies like a plane.
Popular Mechanics ^ | FR Post 9-30-2002 | BY SCOTT R. GOURLEY

Posted on 09/30/2002 2:20:06 PM PDT by vannrox

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Interesting.
1 posted on 09/30/2002 2:20:06 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vannrox
The V-22 Osprey Keeps on Crashing Despite Confidence
2 posted on 09/30/2002 2:27:02 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Veley interesting!
3 posted on 09/30/2002 2:27:50 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
4 rotors equaling 4x the risk of equipment failure?

How well does it fly with one rotor taken out?
4 posted on 09/30/2002 2:32:55 PM PDT by Jason Kauppinen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Keeps on crashing? What, like, four times?
5 posted on 09/30/2002 2:36:20 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
They're still trying to push that tilt-rotor pipe dream?
6 posted on 09/30/2002 2:42:17 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jason Kauppinen
How well does it fly with one rotor taken out?

Like a brick.

7 posted on 09/30/2002 2:50:54 PM PDT by balrog666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
bump.
8 posted on 09/30/2002 2:55:51 PM PDT by PsyOp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balrog666; Jason Kauppinen
<< How well does it fly with one rotor taken out?

Like a brick. >>

Nah.

That's on all four.

Lose one and it flies like a brick outhouse in a thermal.
9 posted on 09/30/2002 3:01:13 PM PDT by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jason Kauppinen
How well does it fly with one rotor taken out?

About as well as a traditional helicopter that loses its main rotor.

However, loss of an engine isn't instantly fatal--the rotors are dual-connected to both the engine they're attached to and to the opposite side engine.

10 posted on 09/30/2002 3:04:23 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
However, loss of an engine isn't instantly fatal--the rotors are dual-connected to both the engine they're attached to and to the opposite side engine.

If it won't be used to defend our borders, the program should be axed.

11 posted on 09/30/2002 3:08:56 PM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Gee Poohbah, why does the military even try to develop new systems? It seems like every time a new one is announced, the "experts" come out and tell us how worthless it is.

I remember experts like these telling us that the Apache was a death trap and the development of the M1 was useless because the tank was obsolete.

Dang, we should have listened to them. ;-)

12 posted on 09/30/2002 3:11:21 PM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
Notice the 4 ea engines are interconnected by driveshafts.

I would think that if you lost an engine, you'd simply lose 25% of your power.

If the rotor itself gets whacked, it'll probably still fly better than any helicopter that's lost a rotor.

I think it's PURDY!!
13 posted on 09/30/2002 3:18:34 PM PDT by misanthrope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Why do the "Exhaust Duct Doors" re-direct exhaust upward, as the port aft engine shows. What purpose could that serve?
14 posted on 09/30/2002 3:23:31 PM PDT by misanthrope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: misanthrope
bmp
15 posted on 09/30/2002 3:32:12 PM PDT by misanthrope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: misanthrope
That's not exhaust--that's a blade tip.
16 posted on 09/30/2002 3:37:40 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

WIPE THE SMILE OFF OF THIS MAN'S FACE.

VOTE THE RATS OUT!!

DONATE TONIGHT.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

17 posted on 09/30/2002 3:38:22 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

V-22 Osprey

Losses

11 June 1991 -- An Osprey crashed three minutes into its maiden demonstration flight at a Boeing helicopter flight test center in Wilmington, DE. There were no serious injuries in the crash, which was blamed on gyro wiring problems. Two crew members safely ejected, and the aircraft was badly damaged the accident.

20 July 1992 -- Seven crewmembers lost their lives when a prototype of the V-22 Osprey fell into waters off the Quantico, VA, Marine Corps Air Station. The crash occurred after an engine caught fire as the aircraft was completing a 700-mile non-stop flight from Eglin Air Force Base. mechanical failure was found to have triggered a fire that disabled an engine. The identified design deficiencies were corrected and incorporated in all production aircraft.

08 April 2000 -- An MV-22 crashed during a noncombatant evacuation evaluation mission. The crash claimed 19 lives -- the deadliest air disaster for the Marines since 22 died in a helicopter crash in 1989. The Osprey was one of four flying from Marine Corps Air Station Yuma, Ariz. It crashed at Marana Airport near Tucson. The mishap aircraft was one of five production aircraft delivered to the Marine Corps for operational use. Officials said that an examination of data did not indicate any mechanical or software failures. In the last seconds of its flight, the mishap aircraft was in a high rate of descent at a relatively low forward airspeed. These characteristics can lead to a condition known as power settling (or vortex ring state) which can result in a loss of lift on the rotor system. Power settling is a phenomenon common to helicopter flight. The primary cause of the crash was the pilot descended too quickly -- 250 percent the acceptable rate.

11 December 2000 -- An MV-22 Osprey crashed in North Carolina during a night training mission. Four Marines were killed when the MV-22 crashed in a remote wooded area about 10 miles outside Jacksonville. The crash was the fourth accident involving the tilt-rotor aircraft since 1991. The Navy and Marine Corps grounded all MV-22 Osprey flights until further notice. The accident investigation concluded that a leak in a chafed hydraulic line, coupled with a software glitch, had caused the crash. The software problem contributed to the aircraft going out of control, rather than compensating for the hydraulic leak.


18 posted on 09/30/2002 3:47:05 PM PDT by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
No, it's not.
Left rear engine, on the bottom.........
19 posted on 09/30/2002 3:48:09 PM PDT by misanthrope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: michigander
The Marana crash involved a former KC-130R pilot who had little experience in rotary-wing flight.
20 posted on 09/30/2002 3:48:44 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson