[San Jacinto]

It's referring to what happens if the senators term is scheduled to continue. For example, if the Torch was NOT up for election this year.

I think you are absolutely correct. So that means if Torch DID go ahead and resign, the gov. would appoint his replacement....but only until January. Also, if NJ law is followed the "replacement" does not get his name on the ballot. Right?

[for-q-clinton]

Not sure if he would get his name on the ballot or not, but I do know that he won't serve past Jan. when the new congress is sworn in.

[Dianna]

I think you are absolutely correct. So that means if Torch DID go ahead and resign, the gov. would appoint his replacement....but only until January. Also, if NJ law is followed the "replacement" does not get his name on the ballot. Right?

The replacement person would go on the ballot as the incumbent. I don't know why this would be "more legal" but Napolitano made it sound like a done deal.

[Torie]

Correct. The whole thing is a ridiculous red herring. But then I am a lawyer, so am used to this sort of byzantine labyrinth.