Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Firefighters Investigated For Frolic With Woman In Thong
Pittsburgh Channel ^ | 9/25/02

Posted on 09/27/2002 6:20:42 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection

Video of a woman on an Upper Darby, Pa., firetruck has landed volunteer firefighters in a situation too hot to handle.

The firefighters snapped pictures of a sexy Philadelphia dancer as she posed suggestively on their Ladder 37 truck outside a Rolling Stones concert at the Tower Theatre.

A professional photographer who was outside the theater captured a much different picture from the one he originally was shooting for.

The unidentified woman posed on the truck wearing a Fire Station 3 helmet, a cut-off black tank top with the word "sexy" on it and short shorts. At one point, she dropped the shorts to reveal her thong underwear.

In one shot (pictured, left), a fireman appeared to be tucking the woman's underwear back in her shorts and helping her zip them up.

Some residents are upset about the pictures

"You have a duty to uphold the obligations and integrity which that organization subscribes to," said Upper Darby resident Chris Felton.

Township officials are also steaming over the sensuous scenes.

"People use poor judgment. It's not appropriate for firefighters to put themselves in that position. Poor judgment," said Upper Darby Administrator Thomas Judge Jr.

Judge also said that at least four volunteers, whose names he would not release, should not have allowed their late-night entertainer on the truck. He said that the truck might have made an unauthorized stop at the concert.

Judge said that the deputy fire chief and the fire marshal were at the concert on official business. The deputy then called for additional help. Which fire companies responded is still under investigation.

"They are out representing Upper Darby Township when they are on the job, and if they don't want to act in proper, procedure manner, then we don't want them as volunteers," Judge said.

The administrator also said that he hopes to wrap up the investigation by Friday and decide on the firefighter's punishment at that time.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: firefighters; investigated
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: Pining_4_TX
Perhaps some Freeper males could explain something that has puzzled me for some time. Are conservative men concerned with morality or not? Is their morality relative? Do they believe what the Bible says or merely pay it lip service? You can't have it both ways. This is not what I would call admirable behavior and shows no respect for women or for the citizens who pay them.

I was thankful it was a WOMAN the men were "admiring"...ahem.

21 posted on 09/27/2002 7:27:21 AM PDT by GummyIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US
Sorry, but I fail to see how this kind of behavior elevates the firefighters' standing in the community. As a parent, this is the kind of "professional" behavior I'd want demonstrated to my kids? I think not!
22 posted on 09/27/2002 7:28:24 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
These guys are volunteers? Leave them alone. They put in more hours of public service than any of the damn political hacks who will try to bust their stones. They're allowed to have a little fun.
23 posted on 09/27/2002 7:29:54 AM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX
Do they believe what the Bible says or merely pay it lip service?

Do I have to be a Bible thumper to be Conservative?

24 posted on 09/27/2002 7:32:04 AM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
You Sir, have the correct answer, Thank You.
25 posted on 09/27/2002 7:33:06 AM PDT by Inge_CAV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX
Conservative men are concerned with morality. But we also recognize a strong concern to keep an eye out for scantily clad women.
26 posted on 09/27/2002 7:33:25 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy
we have been in DIRE NEED of a thong thread for some time now! thanks for the ping!

How do I get on the thong ping list?

27 posted on 09/27/2002 7:33:43 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
If you look closely at that pic, it looks like a tv announcer or tv-man (Channel 10 and the peacock on the back of the shirt).
28 posted on 09/27/2002 7:36:14 AM PDT by GummyIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The photo shows a community outreach effort on the part of the volunteer.
29 posted on 09/27/2002 7:36:30 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX
This is not what I would call admirable behavior and shows no respect for women or for the citizens who pay them.

I presume by "pay them" you're referring to the firefighters, right?

30 posted on 09/27/2002 7:43:49 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX
"or merely pay it lip service"

Not true. You can tell by the picture that he's using his hands.

31 posted on 09/27/2002 7:50:48 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GummyIII
Nope...not a logo on the shirt...I looked at original article. The news agency put their logo on the pictures. S'cuse me.
32 posted on 09/27/2002 7:52:16 AM PDT by GummyIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
That's funny!

I hope you realize that neither asbestos nor tin-foil will protect you from self-righteous indignation.

33 posted on 09/27/2002 7:53:17 AM PDT by Joe Driscoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
Good point.
34 posted on 09/27/2002 7:59:55 AM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
Being the fire fighters were volunteers, kinda makes it a poor judgement call more than anything else. Theoretically the truck being at the concert without need may have placed the rest of the district at risk...

Make em pay for the gas etc that it cost, and give em a reprimand if warranted.
35 posted on 09/27/2002 8:32:21 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
According to some here, yes.
36 posted on 09/27/2002 8:37:17 AM PDT by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy
Let's get the Thong Song going for this thread....who has the lyrics?
37 posted on 09/27/2002 8:37:37 AM PDT by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Newscaster:This is so disgusting and horrible. A woman in cutoffs on a firetruck and she showed her thong underwear.

We'll be right back after this commercial's from Victoria's Secret and Girl's Gone Wild.
38 posted on 09/27/2002 8:46:27 AM PDT by philetus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX
Perhaps some Freeper males could explain something that has puzzled me for some time. Are conservative men concerned with morality or not? Is their morality relative? Do they believe what the Bible says or merely pay it lip service? You can't have it both ways. This is not what I would call admirable behavior and shows no respect for women or for the citizens who pay them.

I challenge your assumptions here. Since they are volunteers it is difficult to argue they show no respect for the people who paid them. Secondly, I am a bit curious on how you claim no respect for women... If a woman gets her self esteem from showing off her body, or just enjoys it, I don't think it can be argued that those looking have no respect for women. Might be sad and pitable that the woman gets her worth possibly from such behavior, but I fail to see the inate disrespect to the entire gender. As to what is or is not morally acceptable, this is indeed different for all people. Is looking at a scantily clad or naked woman, who obviously is scantily clad or naked for the sole purpose of being looked at inately evil? I am hard pressed to believe that it is. Is using ones sexuality to make a living inately evil? Again, I am hard pressed to argue that it is. Do I agree that sex is far too prolific in our society? Absolutely, corporations use it to promote everything and bombard children with sexual imagery from the moment of birth. I agree it should be toned down and should be kept from children.. there is no reason some woman in a thong barely covering her slit should be gyrating on a tv at 3:30pm in the afternoon. I do believe however that adults can engage in adult activities. I am not a huge fan of repression. Live and let live is what I tend to use as my moral guidepost. Provided they are not doing anythign to harm others. I treat others with respect, and how I should be treated, but do not attempt or want to be in charge of enforcing my view on others. I know there are some who think the genie should go back into the bottle, but the reality it is it can't and it won't. I believe the FCC should do more to keep crap of our airwaves, yet the "conservatives" at least politicians, may rant about it, but when push comes to shove, their "free enterprise" mantra overpowers their rhetoric and instead of a more powerful FCC they undercut and advocate its demolision. I would never be disrespectful to a woman, I always hold the doors for them. Treat them as equal, and enjoy greatly their company. I would never expect anything from them beyond what they desired to offer, and would not lie, cheat or steal to get them to offer more. SO I believe I am very respectful of the fairer sex, after all they rule the world anyway. (some just haven't figured that out yet, they are called feminists) If your question is however, do I believe strip clubs are inately immoral? No, I don't. Do I believe nudity is inately evil? NO I do not. Do I believe in adult situations adult activities are inately wrong? No I do not. Taking advantage of someone, anyone obviously is, but I don't believe every situation where a woman acts lewdly is being taken advantage of by men around her.

39 posted on 09/27/2002 8:49:08 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX
Perhaps some Freeper males could explain something that has puzzled me for some time. Are conservative men concerned with morality or not? Is their morality relative? Do they believe what the Bible says or merely pay it lip service? You can't have it both ways. This is not what I would call admirable behavior and shows no respect for women or for the citizens who pay them.

I challenge your assumptions here. Since they are volunteers it is difficult to argue they show no respect for the people who paid them. Secondly, I am a bit curious on how you claim no respect for women... If a woman gets her self esteem from showing off her body, or just enjoys it, I don't think it can be argued that those looking have no respect for women. Might be sad and pitable that the woman gets her worth possibly from such behavior, but I fail to see the inate disrespect to the entire gender.

As to what is or is not morally acceptable, this is indeed different for all people. Is looking at a scantily clad or naked woman, who obviously is scantily clad or naked for the sole purpose of being looked at inately evil? I am hard pressed to believe that it is. Is using ones sexuality to make a living inately evil? Again, I am hard pressed to argue that it is.

Do I agree that sex is far too prolific in our society? Absolutely, corporations use it to promote everything and bombard children with sexual imagery from the moment of birth. I agree it should be toned down and should be kept from children.. there is no reason some woman in a thong barely covering her slit should be gyrating on a tv at 3:30pm in the afternoon.

I do believe however that adults can engage in adult activities. I am not a huge fan of repression. Live and let live is what I tend to use as my moral guidepost. Provided they are not doing anythign to harm others. I treat others with respect, and how I should be treated, but do not attempt or want to be in charge of enforcing my view on others.

I know there are some who think the genie should go back into the bottle, but the reality it is it can't and it won't. I believe the FCC should do more to keep crap of our airwaves, yet the "conservatives" at least politicians, may rant about it, but when push comes to shove, their "free enterprise" mantra overpowers their rhetoric and instead of a more powerful FCC they undercut and advocate its demolision.

I would never be disrespectful to a woman, I always hold the doors for them. Treat them as equal, and enjoy greatly their company. I would never expect anything from them beyond what they desired to offer, and would not lie, cheat or steal to get them to offer more. SO I believe I am very respectful of the fairer sex, after all they rule the world anyway. (some just haven't figured that out yet, they are called feminists)

If your question is however, do I believe strip clubs are inately immoral? No, I don't. Do I believe nudity is inately evil? NO I do not. Do I believe in adult situations adult activities are inately wrong? No I do not. Taking advantage of someone, anyone obviously is, but I don't believe every situation where a woman acts lewdly is being taken advantage of by men around her.

40 posted on 09/27/2002 8:51:32 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson