West Wing Launches New Season with More Liberal Advocacy (NBC's Campaign Contribution To Demmycrats)

Media Research Center ^ | September 26, 2002 | Brent Baker

[PJ-Comix]

Just six weeks or so before a real mid-term election, NBC’s The West Wing returned to the air Wednesday night with its fictional “President Bartlet” campaigning for re-election six weeks before a presidential vote. West Wing creator/writer Aaron Sorkin who has Bartlet, played by Martin Sheen, facing off against a dumb Republican Governor from the South, used NBC’s prime time to advance the liberal agenda.

     The September 25 episode opened with a campaign rally set at an Indiana farm. Bartlet proclaimed: “We need to find energy alternatives....The Republicans are busy. They’re trying to convince us that they care about new energy and that they’re not in the chest pockets of Big Oil. And that’s a tough sell.”

     Later in the two-hour season premiere, in a scene set in the Oval Office, Bartlet lectured his Commerce Secretary about a global warming treaty: “I think what’s lunacy is a nation of SUVs telling a nation of bicycles that they have to change the way they live before we’ll agree to do something about greenhouse emissions.”

     The season premiere opened with the crowd on an Indiana farm chanting “four more years!”

     Sheen, as President Bartlet, related a joke he subsequently used to slam Republicans: “You know the story about the guy whose car gets stuck in a muddy hole. Farmer comes along and says he’ll pull the car out of the mud, but he’s going to have to charge fifty bucks because this is the tenth time he’s had to pull it out of the mud today. The driver says, 'God, when do you have time to plow your land? At night?’ The farmer says 'no, no,’ night time is when I fill the hole with water.”
     “We need to find energy alternatives. We’re getting our cue [cue? Hard to understand what he said], we’re getting it right now. The Republicans are busy. They’re trying to convince us that they care about new energy and that they’re not in the chest pockets of Big Oil. And that’s a tough sell. I don’t envy them because their only hope is that we don’t notice that they’re the ones who are filling the hole with water every night. And I think Americans are smarter than that. I think we noticed.”
     “This isn’t a time for people whose doomsday scenario is a little less at the pump for Texaco and Shell. This isn’t a time for people who say there aren’t any energy alternatives just because they can’t think of any. This is a time for American heroes and we reach for the stars.”

     A very nice in-kind contribution from NBC to liberal Democrats, the very kind of political promotion that the media will still be able to advance under “campaign finance reform.”

     Later, in a scene set in the Oval Office, Bartlet’s Secretary of Commerce warned him about a global warming treaty’s impact on the United States: “It is shear lunacy to suggest America take unilateral steps while exempting 80 percent of the world’s nations from the same obligations.”
     Bartlet shot back: “Developing nations. And I think what’s lunacy is a nation of SUVs telling a nation of bicycles that they have to change the way they live before we’ll agree to do something about greenhouse emissions.”

     In an interview with the New Yorker in March, even as he claimed The West Wing is “non-political,” Sorkin boasted of how he would use the program to re-play the 2000 campaign. The New Yorker’s Tad Friend wrote:
     “President Josiah Bartlet is up for re-election this November. 'Bartlet is going to be running against Governor Robert Ritchie, of Florida, who's not the sharpest tool in the box but who's raised a lot of money and is very popular with the Republican Party,’ Sorkin said. If this sounds familiar, it should. 'It was frustrating watching Gore try so hard not to appear smart in the debates -- why not just say 'Here's my fucking résumé, what do you got?' We're a completely fictional, nonpolitical show, but one of our motors is doing our version of the old Mad magazine 'Scenes We'd Like to See.'”

     As recounted in the April 3 CyberAlert, on the March 27 episode President Bartlet took a shot at Sorkin’s stand-in for George W. Bush: “Governor Robert Ritchie” of Florida, the Republican presidential candidate. After an interview with the fictional Philadelphia station ends, but while still live with the anchor, President Bartlet is asked about Ritchie’s book in which he advocates drilling in ANWR. Bartlet replied: “I think we might be talking about a .22 caliber mind in a .357 caliber world.”

     That episode also featured a lot of liberal environmental advocacy. For details: http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2002/cyb20020403.asp#6

     As for the show being “non-political,” the March 6 CyberAlert contained a rundown from past CyberAlerts of liberal pronouncements and advocacy promoted on The West Wing over the show’s first three years. For links to fuller CyberAlert articles, some of which feature RealPlayer clips of the scenes: http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2002/cyb20020306.asp#4

4

[PJ-Comix]

I'm glad to see the Media Reseach Center picked up on the fact that The West Wing is a soft money campaign contribution to the Demmycrats. I hope the MRC CONTINUES to catalogue The West Wing's incessant Republican/Conservative bashing. Last night the two folks who "dared" express opposition to Jeb Bartlett was an old hick and a young chick portrayed as obsessed over abortion. You won't see intelligent folks on West Wing portrayed as Conservatives and/or Republicans.

[colorado tanker]

Why does anyone watch that show?

[white trash redneck]

I cannot understand why people watch. My wife, who is a reliable Republican voter (more conservative than I on some issues, less on others) really enjoys watching "The Left Wing." Go figure.

[SES1066]

We're a completely fictional, nonpolitical show, ...

This is the fictional part, right?

[Wright is right!]

"Why does anyone watch that show?"

Know your enemy and his strategery. Ahem.

Michael

[colorado tanker]

"Know your enemy and his strategery." LOL! I wonder if Joe Bart, like Algore and Dashole, will oppose action against Iraq, or will he refuse the Kool-Aid?

[colorado tanker]

I hear you. My wife loves to watch "The American President" over and over. Maybe its a chick thing.

[Sender]

It drives me crazy when my wife wants to watch "The American President" movie every time it's on TV. If it weren't so infused with liberal folderal, it would be a cute movie. But every time I hear it end with environmentalism, corporate greed and "I'm going to get all the guns" as the adoring masses genuflect, I want to hurl.

[My2Cents]

Didn't "President Bartlett" run for re-election in a recent season? (I don't know; I don't watch the thing.) Anyway, once this show has run 8 seasons, doesn't the US Constitution require it to be cancelled?

[Wright is right!]

Actually, abaout 2/3 of the show was devoted to showing just how clueless the DC "elites" are about the other 95% of the country. Toby and Josh miss the campaign motorcade and are stuck wandering about Indiana, on the verge of "never having been heard from again." They are truly fish out of water, with nary a clue 'bout Hoosiers, their lives, and their peculiar way of dealing with time zones. Meanwhile, president Bartlett Pear is about to get his rear end in a sling over an assasination they pulled off last season that is perhaps not so foolproof as they thought it would be.

At the end of the show, Toby and Josh are beginning to SERIOUSLY re-think their premise that positioning Bartlett as "the world's most intelligent candidate" is the way to go. Especially after Hoosier upon Hoosier serially tells them, "Didn't vote for him th' first time, not likely to vote for him this time."

Yes, all the liberal policies are there - but Bartlett seems to be the only one that truly truly believes them. Everyone else keeps bring up reason, facts, etc...and he shoots them down with jingoistic remarks.

The show is worth watching so that you understand your enemy and what he is being fed.

Michael

[TheBigB]

Oops, I left the f-word in my post, didn't I? My bad. :(

[thucydides]

The liberal bias of the news divisions makes all the broadcast networks an in-kind contribution to democrats. Why do the corporate owners do it, even though the liberal line is distasteful to many in their audience, and is causing a steady loss of viewers? In my opinion, it is to buy protection from predatory democrat politicians who are in the pockets of the left activist groups.

[ThinkDifferent]

Last night the two folks who "dared" express opposition to Jeb Bartlett was an old hick and a young chick portrayed as obsessed over abortion.

And don't forget the rolling pin and apron women who were portrayed as crazy loons. As I said on the other thread, you're absolutely right. Shows like this are exactly why liberals love campaign finance reform, it cripples conservatives while not interfering with the loads of free propaganda delivered by Hollywood leftists like Sorkin.

[jdege]

I don't know - I liked "American President."

I like watching a liberal politician committing political suicide because he can't tell the difference between hype and reality.

Remember when Douglas shouts to the walls "how can one lobby be so powerful?"

Because there are millions of us, because we contribute, we volunteer, we vote.

And because we're right.

[Timesink]

Wright is right is right. The vast majority of those two hours were taken up with showing that the entire Bartlet White House staff didn't have a damn clue what life was like for the average American. It ended with Toby and Josh in a cheap hotel bar buying a "regular guy" a drink just to figure out what life is about for normal people.

I watch the show because it's excellently written and acted, and the RATS do not come off nearly as well as Bozell is claiming. Yes, the show contained blatant DNC talking points in Bartlet's big campaign speech, but it was an episode about a Democratic candidate campaigning! What was he supposed to say? The GOP candidate was nowhere to be found in this episode; he'll have to get some major face time somewhere down the road. And I have a feeling he's going to come off looking a lot better than we're being led to believe.

[amused]

Great post, I was especially struck by a line towards the end. Something like "Maybe it's time we stop just telling people our ideas are better and actually have to show them and make it obvious."

Strange, I really didn't expect much and was almost pleasantly suprised how badly they came off. I loved it when the IN teen asked "how many unborn babies did they kill today" and Josh's(?) reaction was retreat.

[Sender]

Yeah, and right before that when he says incredulously "We left them the Mini-14!" Har!

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

“This isn’t a time for people whose doomsday scenario is a little less at the pump for Texaco and Shell..."

They don't seem interested in using fictitious names for the "bad guys". Why don't they come clean and just name the character that Sheen plays, Al Gore.

[amused]

And don't forget the rolling pin and apron women who were portrayed as crazy loons

I thought those were feminazis mad at the first lady?