Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam's agents scour Africa for nuclear bomb uranium
The Times (U.K.) ^ | 09/25/2002 | Michael Evans and Richard Beeston

Posted on 09/24/2002 4:29:09 PM PDT by Pokey78

IRAQI agents have been scouring countries across Africa for uranium to help Saddam Hussein to build nuclear weapons, The Times has learnt.

The dossier released by the Government yesterday noted in passing that Baghdad had recently tried to acquire “significant quantities of uranium from Africa”. But what it left out was evidence supplied to the Cabinet Office’s Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC) showing that Saddam’s agents have secretly visited a number of African countries, 13 of which have uranium as a natural resource.

Uranium, once enriched, could form the core of a nuclear bomb, greatly increasing Saddam’s ability to hold the world to ransom. To date, however, there is no evidence that he has succeeded it acquiring it. “If Iraq had succeeded in buying uranium from Africa, the dossier would have said so,” one Whitehall source said.

One country the Iraqis are known to have targeted is the war-ravaged Democratic Republic of Congo, though no uranium has been extracted there for several years. The mine that produced the uranium used in the American bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 is in an area presently controlled by Zimbabwean troops.

The dossier draws on top secret intelligence, and refers only generally to “Africa” as a potential source of uranium, possibly because of the fear that too detailed an insight might expose the sources.

The dossier states that Iraq has pressed ahead with the production of biological and chemical weapons, which can be deployed in just 45 minutes, and that it is developing new missiles with a range of 1000km (600 miles). The document also says that Saddam may have given his younger son Qusay the power to order the use of such weapons.

What the dossier does not do is link Saddam to Osama bin Laden, al-Qaeda and the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon. Some hawks in the Bush Administration have tried to make that link, but Britain’s intelligence community never believed it existed. The JIC has concluded that Saddam has no sympathy or support for Islamic fundamentalism.

The Joint Intelligence Committee brings together the heads of MI6, MI5, GCHQ, the Government’s signals intelligence centre in Cheltenham, the Chief of Defence Intelligence, as well as policy makers from the Foreign Office, Defence Ministry, Home Office, Treasury and Department of Trade and Industry.

Officials from all of these played a part in drawing up the dossier, which will also have benefited from information from America and probably Israel. The Prime Minister admitted that although it was an unprecedented publication of intelligence material, some of the most sensitive information had had to be excluded.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/24/2002 4:29:09 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Why don't they just buy a warhead from whoever is holding the stockpile of the former Soviet Union? I know there is no accurate accounting for the thousands that were once arrayed against us. Whoever is holding the missing units must want to sell them and probably has little regard for us in the first place.

Worried? I know I am.

2 posted on 09/24/2002 4:51:34 PM PDT by muir_redwoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78; All
It gets worse... raw materials + plans = bombs...

Right here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/756432/posts?page=30#30
As you can see, this film is about a German who was convicted of treason for selling nuclear weapon plans to Iraq, plans which Iraq could sell or pass on to other rogue states or entities. This goes far beyond the trading in military weapons, not beyond what Bernard Schwartz did, though.

3 posted on 09/24/2002 4:55:25 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Well, many DemonCraps say we should wait until Saddam has operational nukes (then he can deemed be a "real threat") and the U.N. gives us permission to do something about it. Isn't that comforting?
4 posted on 09/24/2002 5:01:03 PM PDT by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods; rightwing2
Ahem!

The mine that produced the uranium used in the American bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 is in an area presently controlled by Zimbabwean troops.

At least we know one thing from this attempt - Saddam has U processing capability.

5 posted on 09/24/2002 5:07:18 PM PDT by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
This guy really wants that doomsday weapon. Maybe so he can take everyone else out when he goes.

Emporer Nero commanded that when he died, his soldiers whack out all his enemies. He did (die); they didn't (kill his enemies).
6 posted on 09/24/2002 5:13:55 PM PDT by hoosierskypilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
“If Iraq had succeeded in buying uranium from Africa, the dossier would have said so,” one Whitehall source said.

Now there's a trusting soul. Apparently there's no possibility that Iraq may have obtained uranium from Africa and it didn't appear in the dossier. Nope, that dossier is the Word of God, complete and infallible.

I wonder if this "Whitehall source" leaves his house unlocked, the keys in his car and tells his children to trust strangers?

You cannot prove a negative.

7 posted on 09/24/2002 5:19:06 PM PDT by Imal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Gee, if it's uranium that he's looking for, it looks like Saddam merely has to keep going along his present course - in due time he'll be on the receiving end of lots of (depleted) uranium...
8 posted on 09/24/2002 5:40:11 PM PDT by The Electrician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
I recall Jon Matthews of KPRC radio in Houston once asked "Just HOW MANY nukes would it take to ruin YOUR day???"
9 posted on 09/24/2002 6:21:09 PM PDT by buffyt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Clive
see #5. Tell Cathy.
10 posted on 09/24/2002 6:40:05 PM PDT by patton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The Democrats and Chuck Hagel want a Thermonuclear 9/11, so they can finally have their "evidence."
11 posted on 09/24/2002 6:53:07 PM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
The Democrats and Chuck Hagel want a Thermonuclear 9/11, so they can finally have their "evidence."

No, they want one so they can accuse Bush of not acting decisively while they were obstructing him.

12 posted on 09/24/2002 11:39:52 PM PDT by fire_eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson