Skip to comments.
Why did Blair omit the link between Saddam and Al Qaeda from his final draft?
free republic ^
Posted on 09/24/2002 7:53:24 AM PDT by epluribus_2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
To: The Great Satan
And the whole story is that 9-11 was Saddam Hussein's revenge on the United States, and that his follow-up is a threat so terrible that we cannot (currently) retaliate against him. To those who believe that Saddam already had WMD in place prior to 9-11... I just have to wonder why he didn't use them first. Clean, quick, decisive blow, that takes out much of our country. Why bomb the towers and give us a year to ramp up and prepare for a war. Why not strike the death blow right off the start?
41
posted on
09/24/2002 2:15:38 PM PDT
by
kjam22
To: epluribus_2
Yeah, I know...mine too, but I am trying to do some searches on the people and places in the article to see if I can verify any of the info as credible. Probably won't get it done until tommorrow though, hubby is worse than any terrorist if I don't get his dinner done on time, LOL!
To: kjam22
Why not strike the death blow right off the start? Because he's not suicidal, that's why.
To: Eva
The Germans are experts when it comes to poison gas. They have conducted extensive clinical trials.
To: Edmund Burke
You have that right, more experience than anyone in history.
The Germans have proven that they still need oversight, but I don't think that the US should be the ones to stand guard any longer. I think that the Russians might be better suited to man the bases inside Germany.
45
posted on
09/24/2002 3:50:01 PM PDT
by
Eva
To: The Great Satan
I certainly agree with you about Iraq's involvement in 911, but I can also see where it serves notice on the rogue states and potential rogue states that civilization will react to the threat of WMD (instead of retaliation only.)
It's a "twofer" if it works, because it tears down the "cold war" mindset and puts the biggest potential problem state (IMHO) China on notice as well. In subtle, diplomatic terms, of course.
To: Alamo-Girl; okie01
Yes, I agree with both of you; this is a well-designed, well-thought-out strategy. We find ourselves in a difficult situation, but the government is taking the necessary steps to deal with it (which is quite a change from the last administration).
I think that Pres. Bush's appointment of Donald Rumsfeld as Defense Secretary will go down in history as an early decision that turned out to be perfect for the new era.
47
posted on
09/24/2002 10:26:09 PM PDT
by
Mitchell
To: Mitchell
Thank you so much for the kudos, Mitchell! I agree with you about Rumsfeld - and I really like his choice in Condi Rice, too!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson