To: Tumbleweed_Connection
FReeper tax experts: Will this forgiven debt be considered income to the clintons for tax purposes? Oh, how I hope it will.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"Williams & Connolly loved its p.r. and what (the Clintons) did for p.r. they got back in spades," Adams explained as justification for the lawfirm's generosity. Yea, and ole Dan Webster got a lot of pub when he took on the devil too.
3 posted on
08/19/2002 6:30:46 AM PDT by
mc5cents
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I wonder if this could be viewed as a campaign contribution for Hillary, banned by McCain's new bill? Granted, it doesn't take effect until mid-November, but maybe that's why Williams & Connolly is rushing with this opportunistic forgiveness? I'm sure W&C won't try to get anything in exchange for this either...
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
William Jefferson Blythe Clinton: The Deadbeat.
Imagine that.
5 posted on
08/19/2002 6:35:51 AM PDT by
fone
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"The report, if accurate, raises questions about what the Clintons did with the $7 million they collected from their legal defense fund, which they established in 1994 to handle the crushing legal debt they expected to result from a myriad of scandal investigations." I'll wait for the crack investigative reporters (today's Woodward and Bernsteins, if you will) to look into this.
Still waiting . . .
Still waiting . . .
Still waiting . . .
13 posted on
08/19/2002 7:17:08 AM PDT by
KeyBored
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
It's been known that the Clinton's tend to stiff people, bing and small.
* Remember when Hillary stiffed a waitress of a tip? (There was a stink, so she finally gave her a $100 savings bond.)
* In Gary Aldrich's book "Unlimited Access": Hillary had an aid pick up some personal items at a drug store, late at night. She never reimbursed him.
* I remember one of Hillary's ghost writers was stiffed.
17 posted on
08/19/2002 10:48:13 AM PDT by
NEWwoman
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson