Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cva66snipe
There is no doubt that Sundquist ruined the both Tennessee economy and the reputation of the good Republicans in the state. My brother lives in Nashville and told me that people were moving from Kentucky just to live in Tennessee for the "free health care." Sundquist's low popularity and bad policies are reasons why Bush would not campaign with him in 2000.

My point is that you "proved" Bush was in favor of certain legislation simply because a person who favored those ideas endorsed him.

If this is how we define polititians, how would we label Pat Buchanan who was endorsed by skin-heads and racists?
98 posted on 08/10/2002 4:50:00 AM PDT by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: 11th Earl of Mar
My point is that you "proved" Bush was in favor of certain legislation simply because a person who favored those ideas endorsed him.

Go back and read that post again. Let me ask you something. If I wanted to make political points running for office and the person supported items I DID NOT ENDORSE don't you think I could find an issue that I could say was good and NOT LEAVE THE IMPRESSION I AS Well SUPPORTED THIS AGENDA? The words were from Georgewbush.com not AP it was his own press release in his own site. That says it all.

You will find very simular misconceptions in the forum that Bush is Pro second ammendment. He is not and he never was. After reading his press releases on the matter clarifies his positions of restrictions after restrictions on gun ownership.

But the article I posted has Bush PRAISING SUNDQUIST FOR UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE

and not the other way around.

133 posted on 08/10/2002 3:09:31 PM PDT by cva66snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson