[Michael O Mahony]

I consider myself a hard line right winger. However, at first I was quite opposed to an overthrow of Saddam. Now after reading many articles and listening to Rush I have become strictly neutral. If anyone can give me a more convincing reason on why such an attack should be used by all means go ahead. My logic says yes but my emotion says no. So please, lend me a hand!

[lavaroise]

Saddam is seeking the type of police international jurisdiction that nuclear weapons and weapons of mass destruction provide. It simply cannot be accepted. He cannot have such jurisdiction. Maybe we will let him gas his own people and give him benefit of the doubt, but neighbors? I don't think so. Just as intolerable was the gaining of jurisdiction over Kuwait, so is his search for weapons of mass destructions tiped on rockets able to reach Europe or maybe America some day.

[DB]

It cost American blood to force Iraq to surrendered to our terms. Those terms have been repeatedly violated since. This alone is cause in the name of those who died for those terms.