Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

So....who was it? Iraq...Iran? (assuming that you believe Musharraf)
1 posted on 08/04/2002 2:33:57 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blam
"He was perhaps the sponsor, the financier, the motivating force. But those who executed it were much more modern. They knew the U.S., they knew aviation. I don't think he has the intelligence or the minute planning. The planner was someone else," Musharraf said about the Saudi-born militant.

I think he's just saying that others in Al Qaeda were actually responible for drawing up the plan on a tactical level. Which is what intelligence people have said all along. Sounds like somebody took what he was saying out of context to try to make a sensational sounding story.

2 posted on 08/04/2002 3:11:31 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
I don't think he [bin laden] has the intelligence

well, at least musharaaf and i agree on this one thing.

7 posted on 08/04/2002 5:39:10 PM PDT by mlocher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
So....who was it? Iraq...Iran? (assuming that you believe Musharraf)

please re-read the article. musharaaf is speaking more about the hierarchy and operations of al-qaeda than he is about al-qaeda innocence. he did say bin laden probably financed it but that others with more technical knowledge planned it.

rueters deserves a[nother] swift kick in the ass for how they portrayed this story. it is yet another liberal article trying to present data as facts with a spin that has the intent of undermining the war on terror.

reuters is scum.

8 posted on 08/04/2002 5:43:06 PM PDT by mlocher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
I think Musharef is saying bin Laden is going to be discovered to have beeen DEAD (he's dead Jim) but that it doesn't matter because what remains is still very dangerous.
9 posted on 08/04/2002 7:16:32 PM PDT by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
If the details of the attacks were worked out by some underling, it doesn't exonerate the leader! Looks like Musharraf is attempting to shift the blame to some one unknown and of little consequence. Can't expect much help finding OBL, if he's alive, or any of the top Al Qaida scumbags, holed up in Pakistan.
10 posted on 08/04/2002 7:24:15 PM PDT by mikeIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam; Mitchell; Nogbad; EternalHope; Thud; Sabertooth; Plummz
"I didn't think it possible that Osama sitting up there in the mountains could do it," Musharraf said in an interview in the Aug. 12 edition of the New Yorker magazine, nearly a year after hijacked planes killed more than 3,000 people in New York, Washington and in Pennsylvania. "He was perhaps the sponsor, the financier, the motivating force. But those who executed it were much more modern. They knew the U.S., they knew aviation. I don't think he has the intelligence or the minute planning. The planner was someone else," Musharraf said about the Saudi-born militant.

Yep, Osama was basically a recruitment guy. That's not to be sneezed at: human bombs are just as good as ICBMs, and something no Western, individualist culture could ever produce. But even the for-public-consumption narrative currently on offer in the US doesn't pin the planning on bin Laden, but rather on a Philippines-based, disco dolly-trawling, Johnny Walker Black Label-swilling co-conspirator of 1993 WTC bomber Ramzi Yousef by the name of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed (above). Who stands behind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed is something we are about to find out.

11 posted on 08/04/2002 8:08:46 PM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson