[FreedominJesusChrist]

Well, what I find hypocritical is that many of you people on the JW threads knew that ned was a multiple-screename liberal disruptor, but yet you guys said nothing when he sat there and shamelessly bashed Larry Klayman.

That is very disappointing and at least I said something to him and stopped supporting humble in his Keyes threads.

[Amelia]

Well, what I find hypocritical is that many of you people on the JW threads knew that ned was a multiple-screename liberal disruptor, but yet you guys said nothing when he sat there and shamelessly bashed Larry Klayman.

I repeat, I thought everyone knew ned had more than one screen name.

I did not know, and am not yet convinced, that he was a liberal disruptor.

If you'll recall, there were more people bashing Larry Klayman on those threads than there were defending him.

[Amelia]

I suppose that those of you who "won't be voting for Bush in the next election because he isn't a REAL CONSERVATIVE" would have thought ned was a liberal.

[terilyn]

I didn't know.

Looking back, I don't necessarily believe he/she was a liberal disruptor.

I think the posts were designed to make us look at ourselves.

Whether Larry Klayman, Alan Keyes, or GWB. I honestly believe he/she was trying to make us see how ridiculous it was to worship another human.

Face it, the JW threads would have gone no better and no worse had "ned" not contributed. His posts on those threads were few and very short. None were attacking and most were done with humor.

You have a very thin skin where Larry is concerned.

Even the most ardent Bush-bots can find one or two items to disagree with the President on, (CFR, immigration, farm bill, etc.). Even while we continue to support him overall.

With you, the full set of blinders is on when it comes to JW.