Replies

I'm allowed to question your skills and experiences, when you're commenting on highly technical threads without any development experience.

If you're a QA person who's disagreeing with a dozen developers on a fine point of OS design, as in that thread, the question of experience is highly relevant.

That's not personal, it's part of the 'rip-roaring' debate.

But calling me personal names, and sending filth-laden emails insulting and threatening *is* personal.

You must see the difference?

Ah... so it's OK for you to tell people they're wasting their boss' time and money, but it's not OK for me to say my only experience with your prefered development method (which never involved you, we've never worked together, thank God) was bad (which is no comment on you, only on the managers I worked with that like prototyping). I begin to see now. Anything Dominic Harr says is OK because he's fighting a battle against the evil MS monopoly. Anything anybody says that contradicts Dominic is bad because they're dupes and apologists. Thanks for explaining that.

Oh, and I never threatened you. I did call you every name in the book, and I'll do it again if you insult my profession with an across the board broadside. But there were no threats.

That's not personal, it's part of the 'rip-roaring' debate.

Let's be clear, Harr. You continually call other people "shills", "apologists", "unprofessional", "inexperienced", etc. And then you have the audacity to complain about personal attacks. Do us a favor, Harr: Ram your hypocrisy where the sun don't shine.