Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Husker8877
Clinton apologists forget that he started micro managing every aspect of the government and defense from day one. Try again, Monica wanabees.

It's a pity that the family had to send this letter at all, and to a man with no conscious.

The time to take out Saddam Hussein was definitely when he started rejecting the UN mandates. Cracks started appearing under President Bush 41, but there wasn't enough grounds to even suggest removing Hussein until near the end of the Bush administration. Plus Saddam always came back in line the fist year or so after we threatned him again. Attacking Iraq during the election (92) would have been considered political maneuvering. Real Presidents don't leave a mess for the next one to clean up. The most obvious times to strike Iraq happened on several occasions during the Clinton administration most notably when the UN weapons inspectors were thrown out the last time. The Slickster did nothing.



75 posted on 07/31/2002 1:08:26 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: Hillarys Gate Cult
I agree. Clinton should have burried Sadam. He was a bad president. The error was precipitated by leaving Sadam in power in the first place. It's not hindsight. I ( and the rest of the world , Including our enemies and probably Sadam himself ) thought that we were crazy to do so. We did it to create and maintain unneeded coelition. It was utter foolishness.
77 posted on 07/31/2002 1:39:10 PM PDT by stalin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson