Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kerberos
I think I'll stick with Franklin.

I am with you on this. After all, around the founding it would have been much much easier to commit crime or terror. No real safeguards in place. Heck it was not too long ago you were able to knock on the door of the White House. Interesting that they say there is more danger now, there really is not, it is just more quickly transmitted to the masses that it has happened. I am sure President Lincoln would agree that he experienced terror as did others back then. Their life expectancy was very very low and anyone could have a gun. I say it is the same, just made more sensational.

10 posted on 06/19/2002 11:44:00 AM PDT by ICE-FLYER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: ICE-FLYER
"that they say there is more danger now, there really is not, it is just more quickly transmitted to the masses "

That was my thoughts on the matter. The article is trying to make the argument that changing technology has invalidated Franklin’s principle. But although technology has transformed the world over the last couple hundred years, the nature of man has remained the same.

84 posted on 06/19/2002 1:20:15 PM PDT by Kerberos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson