Skip to comments.
Enviro-Nazi Quotes
Rural Cleansing ^
Posted on 06/14/2002 11:30:13 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: Tailgunner Joe
I once read somewhere that if we horses instead of cars, we'd be about four feet deep in manure today. I think that is the problem with these people. They are full of manure. They should all have horses--better yet, elephants.
To: editor-surveyor
Note to self= never vote for any of those quoted and never let them be appointed to any environmental position.
62
posted on
06/14/2002 6:40:06 PM PDT
by
mafree
To: Glutton
"...you will outlive the [deleted].
Not a bad quote; that's my consoling theory, also. ;^)
To: Joe Brower
The words and deeds of these eco-gestapo become very clear and rather predicable when one bears in mind that they not so much love nature as they hate people.
Yep. I've referred to 'em more than once as Malthusian driven misanthropic megalomaniacs. The term doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, but it needs very much to be thrust in their faces because it's a far cry from how they view themselves.
To: Tailgunner Joe
And 30% of the South voted for Gore because of his environmental stance? People want wilderness area and a clean environment, sure, but within bounds of reason and without stripping Americans of their property rights, and industry of it's ability to provide jobs and products.
Their idea of America is everyone crammed into cities and only allowed to drive between places with a pass.
To: TrappedInLiberalHell
Bush? More like the UN, EU, OAS, Greenpeace, Jesse Jackson, NAMBLA, NYT, WP, ...
You know. Everybody that thinks they're so special, they deserve a pass on the stuff that affects the hoi polloi.
To: editor-surveyor
Wow! - Just what we needed, a list of the most ignorant fools, and the stupidest ideas on earth. Well, at least they are consistent. They are as ignorant today as they were ten years ago.
To: Travis McGee
Unmanned solar powered killer drones will get the eco-nazi seal of approval. Unmanned killing machines on land, sea and in the air are our future if we continue on the present course. They will likely not even be under direct human control. We are creating our own extinction, God Help Us.
To: Tailgunner Joe
"
If radical environmentalists were to invent a disease to bring human populations back to sanity, it would probably be something like AIDS. It [AIDS] has the potential to end industrialism, which is the main force behind the environmental crises."
Earth First! newsletter "We in the Green movement, aspire to a cultural model in which the killing of a forest will be considered more contemptible and more criminal than the sale of 6-year-old children to Asian brothels."
Carl Amery, German Green Party
To: Travis McGee
Easy! Eco-friendly solar powered UAV robot drones will fly patrol missions, similar to our Predator UAVs over Afghanistan. Any unauthorized humans will be smoked. You know, that has all the makings of a great sci-fi movie. Now if we can just get some brave conservative film maker to do it. Mel Gibson or Arnold perhaps?
To: Minnesoootan
Give me any one of these people and one square mile of North Eastern Minnesoota forest and I will have them lost in under a minute,and I bet it wouldn't even have to be cloudy or dark. I could lose 'em just as fast with a forty pound anchor and a couple hundred feet of ocean.
To: Avoiding_Sulla; Tailgunner Joe
Thanks for the bump. Lest we forget the coin flip of the Enviro-Nazis, here is some info on the Animal Rights Wackos:
A FBI agent said, while addressing a National Animal Interest Alliance ("NAIA") meeting, that the FBI has a "profile" on the animal rights wackos. Some things on the list were: highly educated, usually homosexual, vegetarian, embrace eastern religions, frequently have dyed blonde hair and will do criminal acts to fulfill their purposes.
Animal rights wackos ("AR's") have hijacked the humane movement and prey like vultures on the people who really love animals by placing ads and gathering money from them to further the AR agenda. They believe that all animals should be free from emprisonment, even your cat and dog. They would let your child die rather than benefit from humane animal research, 96% of which is done on RATS, not cute puppies.
National Animal Interest Alliance
Fur Commission USA
Fur Institute of Canada
Klamath Basin Crisis
It's Luciferian occultism:
Gaia: The re-ordering of the world - Part I
Sustainable development explained: Joan Veon explains evolution of U.N. global control push - Part II
Churches deceived by green extremists: Henry Lamb describes world religion called 'Gaia'
AL GORE, THE UNITED NATIONS, AND THE CULT OF GAIA (treaties, UN mysticism, Gore's book)
72
posted on
06/15/2002 2:40:05 AM PDT
by
2sheep
To: editor-surveyor
BTTT!!!!!
73
posted on
06/15/2002 3:22:38 AM PDT
by
E.G.C.
To: Avoiding_Sulla
So **this** is why the Anointed present Jacques Cousteau to us as The World's Only Oceanographer.
74
posted on
06/15/2002 3:38:42 AM PDT
by
Mmmike
To: UnBlinkingEye
For anti human insane enviro maniacs, it will be mandatory that the solar powered killer drone UAV's NOT be under human control, to eliminate human softness from the decision to kill "illegal trespassers".
To: Prodigal Son
I agree, but I have as much clout in Hollywood as a flea in Patagonia.
To: Tailgunner Joe
Most excellent. Will use. 'Pod
77
posted on
06/15/2002 4:32:54 PM PDT
by
sauropod
To: Prodigal Son
Watch "Dark Angel" on Fox. The police state scares me.
78
posted on
06/15/2002 4:38:33 PM PDT
by
hattend
To: Tailgunner Joe
"We have got to share this planet with the other living creatures, and sharing means not merely preserving them in zoos or National Parks, but setting aside huge areas. Whole regions perhaps that will be free of human interference. Ideally, I would like to see certain large areas of the planet set off-limits to human entry of any kind, even aerial over flights." -Edward Abbey-Deep Ecology for the 21st Century: The Natural Wonder: An Ecocentric World View. New Dimensions Radio, 1998. What is offensive about this? There's nothing offensive about this. It is about stewardship and responsibility. Teddy Roosevelt was of the same mind, for pete's sake. Have you been listening to too much talk radio?
To: Tailgunner Joe
"Furthermore, most attempts to use sustainability as a management paradigm have been anthropocentric, biased toward commodity production, and seriously flawed from a biological standpoint." -Wild Earth magazine And what about this one? It's not saying that we cannot harvest. It's only pointing out that the sustainability paradigm might now be tilted in a way that is not in anyone's best interest ultimately. I'm sorry, but it seems to me that you are being paranoid rather than practical. You later cite Jacques Cousteau as some kind of enemy?!! Give me a break!! He is one of the most accomplished and famous marine biologists the modern world has ever known! You are getting very paranoid. What is the website you linked--I accessed it and could not determine what it was about; farmers and ranchers in Colorado, where I live, are generally not this paranoid...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson