Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A cool tungsten light bulb may be possible
sandia national laboratories ^ | 05/01/02 | James Gee, et al,

Posted on 05/02/2002 9:07:50 AM PDT by Bobber58

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — Tungsten-filament bulbs — the most widely used light source in the world — burn hands if unscrewed while lit. The bulbs are infamous for generating more heat than light.

Now a microscopic tungsten lattice — in effect, a tungsten filament fabricated with an internal crystalline pattern — developed at the Department of Energy’s Sandia National Laboratories has been shown to have potential to transmute the majority of this wasted infrared energy (commonly called heat) into the frequencies of visible light.

This would raise the efficiency of an incandescent electric bulb from 5 percent to greater than 60 percent.

By doing so, it would greatly reduce the world’s most vexing and important power problem — the required excess electrical generating capacity and costs to homeowners caused by inefficient lighting, as well as the environmental damage accompanying unnecessary power generation.

The advance also opens the possibility of increased efficiencies in thermal photovoltaic applications (TPV). Photovoltaics work best when they are provided with energy from heat-generators with energy emission wavelengths transposed into the most optimal frequencies. (Using a tungsten lattice as an emitter at desirable frequencies, model calculations showed that the TPV conversion efficiency reached 51 percent compared with 12.6 percent efficiency with a blackbody emitter.)

The first step toward this goal, achieved at Sandia by Shawn Lin and Jim Fleming, is reported in the May 2 Nature.

Fabrication of the device was accomplished by an extension of well-known MEMS (microelectromechanical systems) technologies that themselves have been derived from mature semiconductor technologies. As a result, fabrication of such devices could be cheap and easy.

History of photonic lattices

Since the existence of photonic crystals was postulated by Eli Yablonovitch of UCLA more than a decade ago, the most common idea for their use was based on their capability to transmit beams of light at selected frequencies and bend their paths without losing any energy. The structures, most often made out of silicon, consist of tiny bars fabricated to sit astride each other somewhat like Lincoln Logs at regular pre-set distances and angles that form in effect an artificial crystal. Spacing of the bars allows passage of only certain wavelengths; other wavelengths too big for the rafters, so to speak, cannot pass through. Desirable wavelengths not only pass through but also can be changed in direction by creating defects in the artificial crystal that cause the light to follow the defect along like a car passing through a curving tunnel. This meant photonic crystals had potential in optical communications, in which light beams currently carrying telephone messages and data must be converted to electrons — an expensive process — for certain tasks.

Meltdown? Apparently not

A further question considered by Lin and Fleming, with assistance from colleagues Ihab El-Kady, Rana Biswas, and Kai-Ming Ho at Ames Laboratories in Iowa, shifted emphasis from a photonic lattice’s ability to guide light to its capability of stopping other frequencies from passing through it. What happens to these other energies that enter the interior of a three-dimensional crystal? If the crystal were built of tungsten — fabricated by creating a structure of polysilicon, removing some silicon and using chemical vapor deposition to deposit tungsten as a kind of backfill in the mold — the metal could handle quite high temperatures and have a large and absolute photonic band gap in the visible range where it is already known to emit light. But what would happen to the other, lower-wavelength energies brought in by an electric current? Would the structure melt through the buildup of heat? Or, more desirably, would the thermally excited tungsten atoms somehow prefer to reinforce emissions at higher wavelengths, such as in the visible frequency range?

Energy at the edge of the photonic band was observed to undergo an order-of-magnitude absorption increase, or enhancement. This meant that energy was being preferentially absorbed into a selected frequency band. Meanwhile periodic metallic-air boundaries led to an extraordinarily large transmission enhancement. Experimental results showed that a large photonic band gap for wavelengths from 8 to 20 microns proved ideally suited for suppressing broadband blackbody radiation in the infrared and has the potential to redirect thermal excitation energy into the visible spectrum.

The imaginative work seems logical in retrospect, though the theory for the effect — re-partitioning energy between heat and visible light — remains unexplained. “It’s not theoretically predicted,” says Fleming. “Possible explanations may involve variations in the speed of light as it propagates through such structures.”

The work was performed with a photonic crystal operating in the mid-infrared range, but no theoretical or practical difficulties are known to exist to downsizing the structure into the visible light range.

All work was performed on commercially available, monitor-grade 6-inch silicon wafers. These photonic devices were fabricated in Sandia’s Microelectronics Development Laboratory using modifications of the standard CMOS processes originally developed for Sandia’s radiation-hardened CMOS (complementary metal-oxide semiconductor) technologies.

The work was funded by the Laboratory-Directed Research and Development program through project manager James Gee. Co-principal investigator Jim Moreno modeled.


Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. With main facilities in Albuquerque, N.M., and Livermore, Calif., Sandia has major research and development responsibilities in national security, energy and environmental technologies, and economic competitiveness.

Sandia Media Relations Contact: Neal Singer, nsinger@sandia.gov, (505) 845-7078




Back to top of page || Questions and Comments || Acknowledgment and Disclaimer



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Technical
KEYWORDS: energy; energylist; lightbulbs; realscience; techindex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
This would raise the efficiency of an incandescent electric bulb from 5 percent to greater than 60 percent
1 posted on 05/02/2002 9:07:50 AM PDT by Bobber58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bobber58
neato
2 posted on 05/02/2002 9:10:53 AM PDT by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobber58
So my Barbi Easy Bake Oven will no longer work?
3 posted on 05/02/2002 9:12:54 AM PDT by evolved_rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evolved_rage
That is the first thing I thought of, too.
4 posted on 05/02/2002 9:14:55 AM PDT by SarahW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bobber58
What I'm particularly stoked about is the massive increase in efficiency of photovoltaic systems. That could finally make PV systems practical and cost-effective.
5 posted on 05/02/2002 9:15:48 AM PDT by mvpel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobber58
Hmmm . . . Now which will be better, cool tungsten light bulbs, or cool LED light bulbs? Of the LED light bulbs, I've read that the bulbs will never burn out and you could, for instance, operate a bright flashlight continuously for a month before the batteries would need to be replaced. Now that's efficient! I've already seen these LED flashlights in some of the junk mail catalogs I get. The future is gonna be interesting.
6 posted on 05/02/2002 9:47:42 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
What I'm particularly stoked about is the massive increase in efficiency of photovoltaic systems. That could finally make PV systems practical and cost-effective.

This is big news; and surely not good news for the Sheik of Araby.

7 posted on 05/02/2002 10:09:31 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: *realscience
Check the Bump List folders for articles related to and descriptions of the above topic(s) or for other topics of interest.
8 posted on 05/02/2002 10:11:16 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Ancesthntr
Yes, quite literally, the sheik-heads could go pound sand.

Besides these ever increasing efficiencies,

if the carmakers are allowed to use high-pressure EFI{developed as far back as WW II & sat on by Sneakyman Inc. & his 7 little Sisters} each molecule of fuel would be surrounded in a tornadic field of air{93+% clean burn}, we could do without imported earth goo.

But, & oh what a big B U T T, you know who holds the slimy cards.

10 posted on 05/02/2002 10:34:46 AM PDT by norraad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pinlighter
Well, that sounds promising. After all, they sell chips with millions of transistors on them for pennies a pop, and all this is is a latticework. ;-)
11 posted on 05/02/2002 5:49:09 PM PDT by mvpel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I've got a headlamp for hiking that can use either an incandescent or an array of white LEDs. The LED array will go for 10x the amount of the incandescent bulb, but it is not as bright.

Still it is bright enough to see the trail just ahead of my feet and is not so bright that it makes seeing the stars harder.

12 posted on 05/02/2002 6:29:15 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
32 watt T8 fluorescent--85 to 95 lumens/watt
standard F40T12 cool white fluorescent--60-65 lumens/watt
compact fluorescents--low 30's to low 60's lumens per watt, usually 48-60
T3 tubular halogen--20 lumens/watt
white LED--15-19 lumens/watt
standard 100 watt incandescent--17 lumens/watt
incandescent night light bulb (7w)--6 lumens/watt
incandescent flashlight bulbs--dismal, less than 6 lumens/watt

Current white LEDS can beat flashlight bulbs, match large incandescents, but don't come close to fluorescents. They cost much more than any of them.

13 posted on 05/02/2002 7:06:21 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bobber58;tech_index;tech_index; Mathlete; Apple Pan Dowdy; grundle; beckett; billorites...
To find all articles tagged or indexed using tech_index

Click here: tech_index

14 posted on 05/09/2002 9:07:06 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
"I've already seen these LED flashlights in some of the junk mail catalogs I get."

There are several online suppliers of LED flashligh bulbs. Until they come down from their current $30 price (or until batteries begin costing $10 each), these will be attractive only to survivalists and special purpose users. The same logic applies to special "energy saving" bulbs and the cost of electricity. It just ain't worth my while to buy a lightbulb that takes five or six years of energy savings to pay for itself.

15 posted on 05/09/2002 9:20:29 AM PDT by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bobber58
Hey! Another great scientific advancement brought to us by the Muslim world. Oh wait...no it wasn't.
16 posted on 05/09/2002 9:22:07 AM PDT by Henk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobber58
"The work was performed with a photonic crystal operating in the mid-infrared range, but no theoretical or practical difficulties are known to exist to downsizing the structure into the visible light range."

"So it hasn't ACTUALLY worked yet. But we're sure it will."

Wait and see.

17 posted on 05/09/2002 9:38:09 AM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
Who makes that headlamp? What's it cost? Where'd you buy it?
18 posted on 05/09/2002 9:48:15 AM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Harrison Bergeron
It just ain't worth my while . . .

Mine either! One of the articles I read promised that ultimately we'd see a powerful but compact LED flashlight that would give you a month's worth of continuous service on a single AAA battery. That's what I'm holding out for! None of the LED flashlights I've looked at on the web so far come anywhere close to that. Twelve hours seems to be the norm.

I'm sorry I didn't bookmark it because I can't find it now, but right after posting that I actually found a big LED flashlight discussion forum on the web where all they talk about is LED flashlights: Where to get the best ones, where to get the best deals, uses for (and no one mentioned spelunking!), new developments in, etc., etc.

LED flashlights! Six months ago I'd never heard of 'em. And I definitely never heard of this cool tungsten stuff. I live in mortal fear that one day I'll wake up, 100-years old, and somebody will tell me that men landed on Mars twenty years ago. Like that poor old drooling centenarian I saw on tv once who couldn't believe we had landed on the moon.

19 posted on 05/09/2002 10:37:48 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Gee golly that sound's interesting -- the discussion site about LED flashlights that is -- could you post it?
20 posted on 05/09/2002 10:42:08 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson