Skip to comments.President Bush Jokes About Signing Unconstitutional CFR Bill
Posted on 03/24/2002 8:22:33 PM PST by kristinnEdited on 09/03/2002 4:50:10 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
click here to read article
I still support him as commander-in-chief and his leadership in the war on terror, but he needs to reread the Constitution--especially the Bill of Rights.
Bush will sign the bill. The Supreme Court will void it.
Instead of picking on Bush, write those rascally RINOs who represent you and tell them that since they act no better than a Democrat, you're going to help replace them with the real McGilla next time. Its the only language these dirtbags understand.
My disappointment in GWB will be acute.
We're not laughing, so why should you?
Yep. He took an oath to support the Constitution, and he will be violating that oath if he signs this legislation.
Which leads to the question why is he going to sign in?
Some claim he's doing it to "take a political issue away from the dems". But this doesn't make sense since 1) the dems will just find another issue, and 2) CFR has never been a big issue among the voters. If it really mattered to most people, McCain and Bradley would have won the nominations for president in 2000.
Others claim he's doing it to maintain his popularity. This argument, in and of itself, is pretty troubling, since we just had 8 years of it. But to address the point, his approval rating is at 85%. Just how much would he lose if he vetoed it? Rush Limbaugh has even pointed out a way for Bush to gain popularity by vetoing it.
Still others say that he's doing it as part of a "secret plan" to pick up seats for the GOP in the elections this year, by taking the dems issues away. But what better way is there to win, than by showing the dems to be traitors against the 1st amendment?
If none of these are the real reasons, then exactly what is the reason? Occam's Razor basically states that the simplest answer to a question is usually the correct one. In this case, the simplest answer appears to be that Bush really doesn't care about our Rights or the Constitution.
Maybe it's time for you beautiful people to hit the bricks with your beautiful signs and chants, once again.
Even Everett Dirksen, venerable Repellican Senator from IL used to say... "The more I feel the heat, the more I see the light!"
He gave the RINOS free rein and he said he'll sign the bill, so he should get his fair share of criticism.
The RINOS and 'Rats should be voted out and replaced by people who respect the Constitution, but President Bush needs to do his part, too.
LOL! You're telling me a President with an 85% approval rating is bowing before a bunch of gutless RINOs?
If Bush gave a damn about the Constitution, he would veto this bill, and give a primetime speech about his reasons for doing so. He would state that it violates the Bill of Rights, and he would give the names of electorially vulnerable dems and RINOs who supported the infringement on the Bill of Rights.
His base would be ecstatic, the moderates would respect him (as much as a moderate can offer respect), and the liberals would fear him. It's a win-win-win situation.
This leads to me to believe that there are "other reasons" for signing this bill. Basically, politicians of both parties seem hell-bent on taking away our Rights and eroding the Constitution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.