Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sheikh Omar appeared in court: HE'S LAUGHING AT US
Paknews.com ^ | Updated on 2002-03-10 12:10:29

Posted on 03/10/2002 12:43:59 PM PST by Cinnamon Girl

KARACHI, March 10 (PNS): Sheikh Umer Saeed, the main accused in Wall Street Journal reporter Denial Pearl's murder case, appeared in the court of Judicial Magistrate Irm Jihangir here on Saturday.

Shaikh Omar who was arrested in Lahore on Feb 12 by Punjab Police and later was shifted to Karachi was brought to the court under strict security arrangement.

Omar's appearance was to allow the statement of a witness who identified him to be formally recorded before the court and to let his lawyer cross-examine the witness, a taxi driver. But his counsel Saiful Malook refused to cross-examine without having a detail meeting.

Earlier, the taxi driver, who drove Pearl to the restaurant, recorded his statement in the court under section 164. He told the court that Shaikh Omar had forcefully seated Daniel Pearl in his car.

Shaikh Omar however rejecting the statement said that the Taxi driver had given the statement due to intense police pressure.

The hearing took place in close doors and the court adjourned the hearing till March 12.

Meanwhile it is reported that The US government has sought Ahmed Saeed Omar Sheikh's extradition for the killing of an American, who, along with some other Western tourists, was abducted in occupied Kashmir some years back, and not in the Daniel Pearl kidnap and murder case.

However, sources said that the government would hold Omar's trial in the Pearl case in Pakistan if it was able to find sufficient evidence to get him convicted by Pakistani courts otherwise he would be extradited to the United States. Omar's point of view is that he remained in the Indian jails for four years and was charge-sheeted in the tourists' kidnap and murder case but no trial was ever held.

His stand is that he cannot be tried in the same case in the United States because nobody can be subjected to double jeopardy under the Americans' own law. He says that the Americans are working to try him in the same case.

End.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: danielpearl; pakistan; sheikhomar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: TEXICAN II; rebdov; Byron_the_Aussie; shaggy eel; MadIvan
Aint noooobody our friends except the British & the Israelis. A few others share our interests.

Never leave the Kiwis and the Aussies [America's First, Best and Most Consistent Ally!] of that list.

Leaving out a few moronic politicians, New Zealanders and Australians [As they are, once more, in Ashghastlystan] will always be with US!

21 posted on 03/10/2002 2:06:30 PM PST by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl
Omar's point of view is that he remained in the Indian jails for four years and was charge-sheeted in the tourists' kidnap and murder case but no trial was ever held.

His stand is that he cannot be tried in the same case in the United States because nobody can be subjected to double jeopardy under the Americans' own law. He says that the Americans are working to try him in the same case.

Won't he be surprised to find out that he, indeed, can be tried in US courts for the crime. Double jeopardy doesn't attach. Heck, he was only held for the kidnap & murder trial, but never tried in the Indian courts.

He really needs to study up a bit more on the US Justice system, he really does.

22 posted on 03/10/2002 2:10:07 PM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
New Zealanders? I thought they were so left that they fell off the world?
23 posted on 03/10/2002 2:11:43 PM PST by rebdov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
Re: Your Post #17 & #18:
Excellent point! Thank was exactly my thinking as well! Thank you.
24 posted on 03/10/2002 2:12:24 PM PST by grumpster-dumpster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl
This is going to sound terrible to some, but here's a suggestion (though I make this suggestion without knowing much about Daniel Pearl's political slant as a reporter when he was alive):

Do nothing until the Liberal Press in the USA admits openly, publicly and completely that Islam is not a peaceful religion.

At which point, we go in and take the Paki nukes away from them and daisy-cut whatever neighborhood Omar happens to be holed up in (along with a bunch of those "camps" on the western border of the country).

This suggestion assumes, of course, that Mr. Pearl was a member of the Liberal Press. I don't know that to be the case and I offer this suggestion merely in the spirit of "brain storming".

Because remember, it's a tossup which is the greater evil: foreign Islamic extremism, or entrenched domestic media apologism.

25 posted on 03/10/2002 2:19:18 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: rebdov; Byron_the_Aussie; shaggy eel
New Zealanders? I thought they were so left that they fell off the world?

It's true they have allowed their politicians to get away with a bit of left-wing bastardry, lately.

But they'll be back.

And the majority of the population [Which bear in mind is getting smarter! Every time a plane FRom New Zealand touches down in Australia the mean IQ of both places increases by 50%!] is totally in awe of America.

Few older Kiwis will ever forget the Fifth and Sixth Marines -- Guadalcanal and Okinawa -- and 90+% casualty rates!

27 posted on 03/10/2002 2:34:35 PM PST by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl
The whole court system in Pakistan is a complete joke.

It actually isn't, and if you are ever brought before a Pakistani court, you won't be laughing, I'm sure.

28 posted on 03/10/2002 2:37:43 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ratcat
The whole purpose of a secret tribunal is to keep information about the conduct and content of the proceedings from the American people.

wrong

29 posted on 03/10/2002 2:40:06 PM PST by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen;rebdov
,,, thanx for the support Brian. Some people talk as if there weren't two terms of Klinton and the Florida fiasco that delayed Dubya's marginal election never existed.
30 posted on 03/10/2002 2:43:11 PM PST by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
You keep defending Pakistan and Musharraf, Dog Gone, but provide no basis for it. It sounds like wishful thinking on your part.
31 posted on 03/10/2002 2:47:22 PM PST by Cinnamon Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl
Amen. We need to keep on this. I agree, Pakistan is not a friend, just the lesser of evils at this point. Justice will be served.......
32 posted on 03/10/2002 2:52:06 PM PST by WyCoKsRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl
It's a lot of wishful thinking on my part, Cinnamon Girl. I don't deny that, at all.

But all I've posted several articles which demonstrate the steps Pakistan is taking to be helpful to the US and against the terrorists.

George Bush seems to think that Pakistan is being helpful. To some here, that makes him some sort of Islamic apologist.

I think that's nonsense, and I don't apologize for keeping an open mind about Pakistan.

33 posted on 03/10/2002 2:52:41 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I don't think President Bush is an Islamic apologist, and I don't agree with people who think we should cut off every country that doesn't do everything we want (otherwise we wouldn't have our military in all the places we currently have it.) However, I do think the U.S. needs to keep the pressure on Pakistan and make it clear that letting any of the kidnapping ring walk or get off lightly in any sort of way will be unacceptable.
34 posted on 03/10/2002 2:57:11 PM PST by Cinnamon Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl
I think we'll do that. If Omar can't be convicted in Pakistani court, I think he'll still be extradited here.

I also think Musharraf would prefer that he be convicted there, both as a message to terrorists there, and as an indication that Pakistan can handle the situation without meekly obeying US orders.

It's not entirely up to him, though. No more than Bush could order the court in Houston to find Andrea Yates guilty.

35 posted on 03/10/2002 3:04:09 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel;Brian Allen;Dog Gone
Bulls eye. There is nothing we Yankees can ever do to atone for Klinton besides electing conservatives forever. I wonder if we will ever be able to undo all the wrongs he committed in our name the world over? Of course I never voted for him, but then again I can't find anyone who admits to electing Klinton (and the inner cities are just not that big).
36 posted on 03/10/2002 3:25:14 PM PST by rebdov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: goyimum
It beats our enemie$.
37 posted on 03/10/2002 3:26:00 PM PST by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I don't think that Pakistan is being helpful in the usual sense of cooperation. It is being controlled and it is costing plenty for that control. Bush is not being fooled. He knows the mission and unfortunately has to choose between the lesser of two evils. But I don't think that our President has any illusions about Pakistan. A military dictatorship is as strong as the next tyrant on the block is weak.

I say grab those nukes as soon as we can.

38 posted on 03/10/2002 3:29:00 PM PST by rebdov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: rebdov
I hope he doesn't have any illusions. Pakistan is a very difficult challenge for us to manage.

Grabbing their nukes would probably be extremely difficult, and not very effective. They know how to make them.

Even if we were successful in the short term, it would make diplomacy with the entire Islamic world impossible, and ruin our relations with most of our other allies. We can't pay Musharraf back for the assistance he's given by castrating him. Nobody would ever trust us again, and with good reason.

39 posted on 03/10/2002 3:46:35 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: goyimum
A new member? Please excogitate.
40 posted on 03/10/2002 4:05:34 PM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson