Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Stop Press !!) The Universe is not turquoise - it's beige
New Scientist ^ | March 7, 2002 | Eugenie Samuel

Posted on 03/07/2002 10:14:28 AM PST by Oxylus

In January, the true colour of the Universe was declared as somewhere between pale turquoise and aquamarine, by Ivan Baldry and Karl Glazebrook at John Hopkin's University in Baltimore Maryland.

They determined the cosmic colour by combining light from over 200,000 galaxies within two billion light years of Earth. The data came from the Australian 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey at the Anglo-Australian Observatory in New South Wales, Australia.

The new colour is much more subdued

Glazebrook now says the true colour this data gives is closer to beige. "I'm very embarrassed," he says, "I don't like being wrong."

The mistake was caused by a bug in the software Glazebrook had used to convert the cosmic spectrum into the colour the human eye would see if it was exposed to it. "There's no error in the science, the error was in the perception," says Glazebrook.

Wrong shade of white

Glazebrook has now teamed up with Mark Fairchild of the Munsell Color Science Laboratory at the University of Rochester in New York, who pointed out his mistake last month.

Fairchild realized the software Glazebrook was using actually took a slightly pinky looking colour as white. "There was a huge green shift due to the erroneous white point," he says.

When this was corrected, the colour was actually on the pinky side of white, a slight beige colour. Fairchild now hopes to test the software model by generating an exact replication of the cosmic spectrum light and shining it into someone's eye, so they can experience the true colour of the Universe. But Glazebrook is confident this time. "It won't change again," he says.

The John Hopkins group were using the cosmic spectrum - not the subjective colour it corresponds to - to trace the history of star formation in the Universe. Their scientific results are not affected by their mistake.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: science; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Sure. Obviously a ploy to confuse the enemy.
1 posted on 03/07/2002 10:14:28 AM PST by Oxylus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
bump this correction
2 posted on 03/07/2002 10:15:03 AM PST by Oxylus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oxylus
Beige?? Aw, and I just bought drapes to complement the turquoise...
3 posted on 03/07/2002 10:24:24 AM PST by order_of_reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oxylus; all
Freepathon Hypnosis

You are falling through outer space,
Your eyes are getting very heavy,
You feel yourself floating.
When I count backwards from 10
You will be under my control.

10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1



Send FR $500.00! Or whatever amount you can...

Click here!

4 posted on 03/07/2002 10:25:40 AM PST by Jen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oxylus
A real man wouldn't know the difference between "turquoise" and "bluish green." And beige?!? A man would call it light brown.

I think these astronomers must be effeminate.

5 posted on 03/07/2002 10:31:19 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oxylus
Does the universe have track lighting?
6 posted on 03/07/2002 10:34:45 AM PST by shadowman99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oxylus
He had a color convulsion due to extreme heat caused by global cooling.....or .no..that was.......hey,it's hot in here.
7 posted on 03/07/2002 10:36:29 AM PST by Ender@Game.now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oxylus
The true color of the universe.


8 posted on 03/07/2002 10:51:07 AM PST by droid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oxylus
Darn, I just finished buying turquoise stuff to complement the universe. Ebay, here I come! < /sarcasm>
9 posted on 03/07/2002 10:51:15 AM PST by TrappedInLiberalHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oxylus
Jesse Jackson isn't going to like this.
10 posted on 03/07/2002 10:52:45 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oxylus
Already Posted Here
11 posted on 03/07/2002 10:54:54 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oxylus
Dang, and I don't have a thing to wear that matches.
12 posted on 03/07/2002 10:56:41 AM PST by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Already Posted Here

I might have known. I did a search first but nothing came up.

13 posted on 03/07/2002 11:26:37 AM PST by Oxylus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Oxylus
Just a fine point... This research (however pointless it may be) was done at The Johns Hopkins University... not John Hopkin's or John Hopkins. As a student at JHU, it just really bugs me when people get that wrong. So should I be proud that my school is tapping into the fashion conscience of the universe? And I thought my $32,000 a year tuition was going to waste. *rolling eyes*
14 posted on 03/07/2002 11:36:36 AM PST by pvt1863
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oxylus
Oh, darn! This changes all MY plans for the future!
15 posted on 03/07/2002 11:55:53 AM PST by Thorondir
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oxylus
In January, the true colour of the Universe was declared as somewhere between pale turquoise and aquamarine, by Ivan Baldry and Karl Glazebrook at John Hopkin's University in Baltimore Maryland

See there, now the obvious problem is that they were too near the ocean and the colors they saw were reflections of the ocean off our own atmosphere - sheeeeeeeeesh! If they had only been in Kansas they would have known the color was golden from the wheat reflections. Really now, the color is chartruse if you get out into it.
16 posted on 03/07/2002 12:03:34 PM PST by ThinkLikeWaterAndReeds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oxylus
"I might have known. I did a search first but nothing came up."

It's okay. We'll just get the word out twice as fast. (grin)

17 posted on 03/07/2002 12:17:10 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pvt1863
Just a fine point... This research (however pointless it may be) was done at The Johns Hopkins University... not John Hopkin's or John Hopkins. As a student at JHU, it just really bugs me when people get that wrong.

It's a good point. I just sent an email to The New Scientist on your behalf, without mentioning your name or email address, alerting the author Eugenie Samuel to the error.

18 posted on 03/07/2002 3:49:42 PM PST by Oxylus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; Las Vegas Dave; ...

Note: this topic is from March 7, 2002. Thanks Oxylus.

· String Theory Ping List ·
Silly String Ordinance
· Join · Bookmark · Topics · Google ·
· View or Post in 'blog · post a topic · subscribe ·


19 posted on 08/09/2010 5:14:25 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Oxylus’s last posting on FR was Tuesday, March 19, 2002, how did you find this thread?


20 posted on 08/09/2010 7:43:47 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave (To anger a Conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a Liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson